Pauline Hanson - Is She Racist?

Thankfully Pauline Hanson is one of the few intellectual politicians to understand that Islam is a political ideology disguised as a religion, and that is why she is demanding a royal commission into it.

 

My God, are you for real?

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...al-injuries-days-arranged-marriage-Yemen.html

http://www.alexiafoundation.org/sto...age-in-india?gclid=CJjy_e_Utc4CFYeYvAodtNAFpg


In many Islamic countries, child marriages are common practice. Girls far below the age of puberty are often forcibly married to older persons (sometimes in their 50s and later) for various personal gains by the girls' guardian or with the intention to preserve family honor by helping her avoid pre-marital sex. Pedophilic Islamic marriages are most prevalent in Pakistan and Afghanistan, followed by other countries in the Middle East and Bangladesh.[1][2] This practice may also be prevalent to a lesser extent amongst other Muslim communities, and is on the rise among the growing Muslim populations in many non-Muslim countries, such as the United Kingdom[3] and the United States.[4]

The Islamic faith condones pedophilia. Therefore, contemporary pedophilic Islamic marriages are common practice around the globe.


https://wikiislam.net/wiki/Contemporary_Pedophilic_Islamic_Marriages


Why are you excusing the paedophilia behaviour of these filthy Muslims?

 

Of course she's a racist. That's sort of her #1 selling point to her base. Nothing wrong with that, even disagreeable voices need a voice.

 

That is really sad. Calling someone a racist for digging out a nest of paedohilie Muslims and their followers.

 

I think it's just a case of one dumb bogan acting as the piped piper for other dumb bogans.

 

Does she even deny it?

She is the "silent majority" candidate. Every country needs one - to voice what is taboo.

 

Of course she needs to be a voice for others and the opposite side need to voice their opinion about her. I don't think anyone has suggested she not have a voice. Some call her an outright racist, others call her ignorant and others like me call her a brainless bogan with brainless bogan followers. She is a poster child for birth control to be frank!

 

So show me one instance of where I EXCUSED any behaviour. You are accusing me of something... PROVE IT.

First you have your facts TOTALLY wrong ... DELIBERATELY wrong, like Trump and Hanson you misuse the English language to suit your own agenda.

It is NOT PAEDOPHILIA to marry an underage person. IT IS AGAINST THE LAW and any moral codes but it does not go against either the Catholic, Jewish or Christian doctrine.
If it wasn't against the countries laws, the catholic church would marry any person old enough to take communion, puberty ... 12.
The Jewish church would marry any girl over 3 years and 1 day and the Muslims would marry anyone over 9.

Paedophilia is a psychiatric condition where the person can only or primarily only receive sexual satisfaction with a pre-pubescent person. CLEAR

 

I cannot seriously believe you have written this?

You openly accuse Mr. Donald Trump & Senator Pauline Hanson of miss using the English language to suit their agendas, but you have failed to acknowledge the link that was provided, that proves Islam condones Paedophilia and child marriage.

The Islamic faith condones paedophilia. Therefore, contemporary paedophilic Islamic marriages are common practice around the globe.

In many Islamic countries, child marriages are common practice. Girls far below the age of puberty are often forcibly married to older persons (sometimes in their 50s and later) for various personal gains by the girls' guardian or with the intention to preserve family honour by helping her avoid pre-marital sex. Paedophilic Islamic marriages are most prevalent in Pakistan and Afghanistan, followed by other countries in the Middle East and Bangladesh.[1][2] This practice may also be prevalent to a lesser extent amongst other Muslim communities, and is on the rise among the growing Muslim populations in many non-Muslim countries, such as the United Kingdom[3] and the United States.[4]

https://wikiislam.net/wiki/Contemporary_Pedophilic_Islamic_Marriages

Nothing for me to prove. You proved your own guilt.

These are your words, not mine: “…It is NOT PAEDOPHILIA to marry an underage person.”

You then go on to say: “…Paedophilia is a psychiatric condition where the person can only or primarily only receive sexual satisfaction with a pre-pubescent person. CLEAR.”

Why would any rational intelligent individual think an adult man would want to marry an underage pre-pubescent child?

Maybe in your twisted reality, adult men marry pre-pubescent children to play dollies, and hop-scotch with them. But the majority of intelligent people understand that adult men marry pre-pubescent children because they have paedophile desires, and they are sexually attracted to children, and want to engage in sexual activities with the children they marry.

One more point of contention. Please provide a link showing evidence that a Catholic Priest or Jewish Rabbi has openly preformed a wedding ceremony in Australia within the past 100 years between an adult man and a 12 year old girl with the blessing of their families?

 

If the underage person is pre-pubescent it most certainly is paedophilia. Their compliance is not voluntary. Whilst the perpetrator and the family who have given of their child are consciously aware of their misconduct, the child is not. The child is mentally and functionally unable to consent and that is paedophilia whichever way you want to swing it. It is inexcusable for any rational adult to think otherwise.

 

What is even more disgusting, is that certain forum members know that Islam and Muslims condone paedophilia and child marriages. These forum members are excusing paedophiles, because they are excusing Islam and Muslims who are practicing these vile behaviours.

I am starting to think there is a nest of paedophiles on this forum? Why else would they be protecting a religion that condones child marriage in 2016?

 

They are on all forums.

 

I think people who try and convince us of accusations of another in a really desperate way are actually hiding behind something and looking for justification for their own rubbish. You ain't getting no justification here for your sickness. The more he bangs on about the false accusations the more I wish I could call on the law to check this persons background. It's an extreme measure that reaks of something sinister.

 

Look, no matter how much proof I offer neither you or CD will change your opinions. This is my last word on the subject and CD, you can believe what you want about me, I know what I am and so do all who KNOW me.

First let me clarify a few things.
Am I against paedophilia? ... Yes most definitely, you wouldn't want me sentencing you if you were one.
Am I against underage sex? Yes most definitely, and I find the current law of a maximum gap in ages for those 10 to 16 fine.
Am I against underage marriage? Yes most definitely. Even if there was no physical contact it is still illegal for a minor to sign a legal contract.

Let's look at the three items one at a time instead of lumping them all as paedophillia for emotive purposes.

Paedophiles. People who have a psychiatric disorder (see definition posted earlier). These people need removing from society for the rest of their lives. I have been shown no evidence that they will reform, you cannot reform from a psychiatric disorder, you can only hide it. The risks far out way their right to freedom.

People who have sex with children under 16. These are perverts, sick twisted people. These are much worse then the paedophiles, they don't necessarily have an attraction for children, they just don't care, or see it as something special. These people are more likely to assault anyone sexually, these people are much more dangerous then paedophiles. Although some paedophiles do kill the child, a paeodophile is more likely to groom the child, disposing of them when they reach puberty, threatening them if they tell. Like the priests etc. The sexual predator however is more likely to kill the child. Yes they seek some sick sexual gratification. They are more likely to look for 12 to 20 year olds. These people should be removed from society for life. The risks far out way their right to freedom.

The last category is the Muslim guy. He isn't a sexual deviate nor does he have a psychiatric disorder that we know of. He has probably been brainwashed by his parents and his Mufti. He is just following the beliefs and laws of his religion. There are small factions within all religions that take things to the fanatical stage. E.G. Bombing abortion clinics, the IRA, ISIS. All terrorists. Now not all go to that extreme even, terrorism that is, but the traditions (arranged marriage of children) and the laws of the religion that allow it.

What they are not taught, or are discouraged to ignore, are the civil laws of the country. Yes they can make their own decison, that guy was in his mid 20's, yes his parents probably persuaded him to flaunt the law, yes it could have been supported by his Mufti. The baptists I think they are that terrorise abortion clinics are led by an ordained minister. The law that most Muslims, as do most people, give a range of 14 to 16 in most countries including Muslim countries .... well let's look at the top ten.

1: Indonesia. 14% of the worlds Muslims ~ 250 million

2: India 11% of the worlds Muslims ~ 175 million.

Pakistan 10.5% of the worlds Muslims ~ 150 million

Bangladesh 8% .. 130 million

Nigeria 5% 77 million but then again Nigeria has some serious issues.

Egypt 5% 77 million

Iran 4% 70 million again, it's Iran.

Turkey 4% 71 million

Algeria 2% 34 million

Morocco 2% 32 million

 

You mean like the misinterpreted quote from Hamlet "The lady (or gentleman) doth protest too much, methinks"

 

Opps missed one

Australia 0.5% of the world's Muslims. 500K 2.2% of Australia's population.

Lower then some of the top ten.

 

Exactly spot on.

Your post above is thorough and cuts straight to the core. Unfortunately the strawman will continue. You notice he has a quote from an anti Islam site in his signature, which demonstrates the shallow one dimensional thinking. I wanted to give you a reputation but notice I had already given you one so wouldn't allow me to give you another??

Anyway Hanson has the brain of a spoilt teenager, she shoots off before gathering information. This is what makes her dangerous but doesn't say much for her followers either.

 

I consider any human beings to be disgusting grub, if they want to excuse Islam and Muslims for condoning paedophiles, and I personally want no part of them, and nor will I communicate with them on any subject again.

You are an apologist for a religion (Islam) and a group of people (Muslims) who follow a religion that condones and promotes paedophilia.

 

I am NOTHING of the sort. If you think you can transfer your guilt to me YOU ARE WRONG, it is your issue, you can get help you know.

ANYONE who would use such a disgusting act as paedophilia as a weapon to prove they are right and excuse their bigotry, seriously needs psychiatric help. Paedophilia is a terrible blight on mankind, to use it like you do is absolutely disgusting and yes, no reason would ever change your perversion.

 

I'm telling you there is something strangely weird about this guy. I've always considered him a troll but there are other issues deeper in his soul that he could possibly need help with. Trump and Hanson, eat ya hearts out......

Could this be him?

Islam is a good religion, I mean so is Christianity, Hinduism, Buddhism etc etc. All have certain issues with rogues.

 

So he is not a sexual deviate, he's just a naughty boy.

Let him marry his 12 year old bride in an Islamic country there is absolutely no place for it here. None whatsoever.

 

Well that's what Pauline is telling us....

[video]https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=wLaALKVdnq8[/video]

 

I agree totally, and it is illegal as it should be, so tell me what your issue is since we both agree totally except on the definition of words and that you should take up with Mr Webster

Oh and there are very few Islamic countries where he could.

 

Any individual who keeps making excuses for a religion (Islam) and a group of people (Muslims) who condones paedohlihia, is guilty of facilitating paedophilia.

The Islamic faith condones pedophilia. Therefore, contemporary pedophilic Islamic marriages are common practice around the globe.


In many Islamic countries, child marriages are common practice. Girls far below the age of puberty are often forcibly married to older persons (sometimes in their 50s and later) for various personal gains by the girls' guardian or with the intention to preserve family honor by helping her avoid pre-marital sex. Pedophilic Islamic marriages are most prevalent in Pakistan and Afghanistan, followed by other countries in the Middle East and Bangladesh.[1][2] This practice may also be prevalent to a lesser extent amongst other Muslim communities, and is on the rise among the growing Muslim populations in many non-Muslim countries, such as the United Kingdom[3] and the United States.[4]

Palestinian Authority area

According the Palestinian Central Bureau of Statistics, 682 girls aged 14 and younger were legally married in 2000. Two of them were married to men who were 35 or older, 13 to men 30 to 34, 117 to men 25 to 29, 378 to men 20 to 24 and 172 to men 15 to 19. Child marriages of girls 14 and younger made up 2.9 per cent of the total number of registered marriages. In the same year, 13,163 Palestinian girls between 15 and 19 were legally married, surpassing 55 per cent of all registered marriages.

Local human rights organizations are deeply concerned about child marriage in Palestinian society. Participants of a conference in Gaza dedicated to this issue in January 2008, organized by the Palestinian Medical Relief Society (PMRS), warned of the “significant rise in child marriage rate” and its severe psychological and physical implications on the youth.[16][17]


Malaysia

Data in the 2010 progress report to the United Nations on HIV in Malaysia prepared by the Ministry of Health reveals shocking statistics on the number of Muslim girls under the age of 14 who have undergone pre-marital HIV screening in order to get married.
The data shows that 32 girls under the age of 10 and 445 girls between the ages of 10 and 14 went through this testing in 2009 alone in preparation for marriage!

What is also significant is that this phenomenon is taking place in the more developed states in Malaysia, with the highest numbers recorded in Penang (195), Malacca (103) and Johor (87).[12]

Malaysia[edit]

In August, 2010, the Malaysian State of southern Malacca legalized child marriages specifically between Muslim men and Muslim girls below the age of 16. In a country where Muslims now amount to 60% of the total population, they enforce "Sharia law which operates in parallel with the civil legal system." Ivy Josiah, the executive director of the Women's Aid Organisation, says "It is really a regressive move. It is turning back the clock." [43] News like this leaves one wondering what will happen to child abuse laws in Western countries once Muslims form a sizable portion of the population. In February 2010, two girls aged 10 and 11 were wed to middle-aged men in the state of Kelantan. The 11-year-old was found outside a mosque and was taken to hospital for treatment. Sharia court officials have said that her marriage was not officially approved.[44] In December 2010, 23-year-old teacher Abdul Manan Othman married 14-year-old Siti Maryam Mahmod in a mass wedding at a major mosque, after being given permission in an Islamic Sharia court. The Minister in the Prime Minister's Department in charge of legal affairs has shot down calls to ban underage marriage, stating "If the religion allows it, then we can't legislate against it."[4

https://wikiislam.net/wiki/Contemporary_Pedophilic_Islamic_Marriages#Australia

 

Did you notice the last sentence? "He is just following the beliefs and laws of his religion." The same paedophile laws & religion (Islam) this character (LeftRightLeft) is constantly making excuses for.