Mass Shooting in Vegas

"Ban the "NRA" ? Are you joking? I hope so!!

 

Too civilised for you? You banned the CP, and this organisation is hugely more evil than a few misguided idealists. You planning to beat this record?

 

Well, he managed to live the better part of 64 years without being a "thug". No record, no sign of trouble etc. As for his father, based on his record, would you really want that "thug" being a daily influence on his children? And lastly, are you trying to claim all who are raised by a single parent are capable of this monstrous act? You can't be serious........

 

I agree...

 

Most who vote probably care about other people, regardless of side, so if he never voted that might be interesting. Brother said he had no religion or politics. Without extreme views, that pretty much leaves psychopath.

 

Yeah I don't think he colluded......unless, there is some Russian in him.

 

I suspect most of us might behave a bit strangely if our brother had just killed 59 people for no rational reason. In fact not acting weird would be really weird.

 

It asserts nothing meaningful. Mine points that out in case anyone thought yours did.

 

Tres, provided these 3 sources for ISIS taking credit for attacks they had nothing to do with.

http://www.cnn.com/2017/06/02/asia/manila-philippines-resort-world-isis/index.html

http://www.aljazeera.com/news/2017/...ttacker-indebted-gambler-170604042720000.html

http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/isis-claim...rport-leading-evacuation-uk-bound-jet-1640509

 

No less than 23 guns in the loser's hotel room, eh

And another 19 killing machines at one of his houses

Vegas madman was clearly a full-fledged sick old white gun nut ... one of the most dangerous types of terrorist...

 

was the security armed at the hotel? no
was the security armed at the Orlando night club? no
was any one armed at Sandy Hook? no
a church goer was armed at the recent attempted mass murder at the Tennessee church shooting only one lost their life
see how that works

 

If my brother killed all those people I'd be saying he was mad as a hatter and had been living in a country where he was allowed guns by nutters who made a profit out of them.

 

sadly even if people were armed at the event, it would not of helped, there was no one in sight to shoot at, as for the hotel they had to use explosives to get into the room, so a person with a gun would not of helped there either, this required government intervention - and I say that as someone that supports the 2nd more then many on the right

had all 28,000 people had guns, it would not of helped, they were sadly like fish in a barrel

and that said, I am not sure the hotel was a gun free zone, he obviously had many guns with no issues

 

Armed in the hotel? The guy was on the 23rd flood. Unless you think there should be armed security on every floor, the guy would have still gotten off hundreds of shots before someone from the bottom of the hotel could have gotten up there.

The Las Vegas shooting demolishes the NRA’s “good guy with a gun” argument.

 

Dunno yet.

 

Unless he could fly, he would have to take them through to the lift. The question is why you are so determined to see that every nutter can buy all the guns he wants, unquestioned.

 

Precisely.

Fox analyst: 'Founding Fathers didn’t want every juiced-up psycho' owning machine guns

 

We can thank the NRA for loose gun laws, legal automatic weapons, no limits on how many weapons, and no mental health checkups for gun owners. This will happen again and again. Other countries should issue travel advisories on the U.S.

 

It's not your brother the world should be worried about.

 

Paddock couldn't have shot over 600 people with a handgun.

 

Ralph Peters doesn't understand today's laws so no credence should be given to his opinion on what the founding fathers would want in today's world.

 

That logic tho.

 

You have to understand that Marx/Lenin/Trotsky were all atheist, but grew up with a Jewish heritage. The Jewish people were persecuted horribly by Europeans for centuries. The growing hatred of the Tzar in Russia was a great opportunity for this oppressed group to take advantage and control of the country via the "revolution" which was mostly backed by, again, atheist-Jews in Europe and the United States.

The problem is, while they espoused ideals of no class and equality, and while the Bolsheviks (which were mainly run by atheist-Jews) did their best to oppress Jewish religious activity, their main hatred was for white, Christian Europe.

Hitler recognized this and decided to fortify Germany. Unfortunately, he hurt his cause by blaming all of Europe's Jews for the actions of the Bolsheviks. Ultimately, though, the Bolsheviks won because the European Union is Trotsky's dream of a Europe void of culture and national pride, and a slave to a central leftist authority.

The ultimate Bolshevik goal was the eradication of the European Christian - which is why even today the EU is opening its borders to millions of un-assimilating Muslims.

 

how about not going after guns and work on improving mental health care, require it be anonymous, no one is gonna get care if they can't trust it will remain between them and their doctor and of course they have to be able to afford it and the medications needed

we have the same issue with cars right now, some misusing the tool to kill... sadly in a free society these things will happen

we need to make sure we at least offer these people help before they get to this point of snapping and going off the deep end, and that requires it be affordable and anonymous

 

Uganda?