You can use those terms if you want. So what? There's no sound argument for the necessity of the state to have on record the owner of each of the >356,000,000 guns in the US.
If compliance is that low, why pass the law at all? Such laws are more to harass political opposition than have any real impact on crime.
Nope, the snowflakes are those who need the mods to shield them from differing opinions. They demand to be coddled because they can't handle real debates.
Do you feel the same way in states where the popular vote would ban most abortion or even gay men having anal sex?
That has always been his view even though it is obvious to the rest of us that he favors any law that he thinks will harass or hassle gun owners. Remember his mounds of braying that "its only a form" you never see a sound argument for passing the laws he claims would do good. That is what happens when the real motivations are concealed.
Funny thing, New York City with very strict gun control, And it's venerated Pistol license Division that regulates who can obtain a license, Turns out the Police Officers in charge of that division started selling licenses to people that should not have them, this was discovered and a scandal resulted in FEDERAL charges and police officers being either fired or transferred. So much for strict gun control.
I will post what I want and I will make accurate assessments of your views-and based on your long time support for the harassment of lawful gun owners, my assessment is spot on. when you post "it's only a form" dozens of times, I think honest readers can figure out I am being truthful
Oh, and the shenanigans of the NYPD pistol license Division located in 1 Police Plaza, the same building the Police Commissioner has his office. Strange......
In which the purchaser afirms they are not a prohibited person or habitual users of illegal drugs or narcotics or convicted of a felony or domestic violence. You are the only person that keeps mentioning a form when nobody here has ever objected to filling out forms.