Unarmed woman is shot by Police in Capitol. The People Who Scream ‘Police Brutality’ Don’t Care.

So you side with Trump in taking over the gov. and perpetuating the big lie.
Thanks for admitting that.

 

You mean THIS big lie for 4 years that the MSM repeated over and over again? Hehe

 

What makes you say that?

 

Seems like you skipped a few steps in your giant leap to a conclusion there.

 

Not really..

 

So Trump really won the last election ?

 

You have yet to present a SINGLE SHRED of evidence to support that.

 

We're talking about whether Trump is responsible for the criminal actions of his supporters.
You want to blame Trump rather than his human waste supporters because you apparently have no concept of personal responsibility.

 

Are you under the impression that the police station was empty when the human waste stormed it?

 

I'm talking about media which is very much NOT objective. CNN for example is basically the media arm of the Democratic Party. Fox News obviously goes the other way, but not to the extend that they are in bed with the Republicans, considering that they GRILLED Trump at times. And I don't know where you get the idea that 'left wing' means "being better informed, believing in science and free democracy including freedom of the press and equality for all" as if this exclusively applies to the left.

 

Name one single Republican who supports "apartheid style governance."

 

Because she was unarmed, just like the many unarmed black men who were killed. Rayshard Brooks MANHANDLED two cops, stole the taser from one of them, and shot it at them twice! Yet the media had all sorts of questions about his shooting! Michael Brown was also in the wrong, and it ended up being cleared by Obama's DOJ, yet the media had all sorts of questions about his shooting!

How the hell was she "LEADING" the assault?

The Minneapolis Police Station had people in it. After all, it is a POLICE STATION! But you think that it was completely empty!

 

You're the one who brought up "minority rioters." I recognise that not all of the BLM/antifa rioters were minority. And while they were largely not threatening Congress people, they were threatening ordinary people, who are obviously no less important. And as for targeting Congress people, specifically Republicans? You're clearly oblivious to this: https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/...attendees-leaving-trump-speech-at-white-house

Yep, just like a few Trump supporters were opportunistic looters and the vast majority were demonstrating peacefully on Jan 6.

What the hell do you mean they never brought it out? As in they never reported on the rioting on Jan 6? Are you serious? They reported on it a HELL of alot more than the left wing media reported on BLM rioting last year, when they focused much more on the 'mostly peaceful protests.'

 

Seemed to be having trouble with the playback which is typical sbout the fake claims from the right. They never hold water.

 

Having trouble answering questions ? That seems to be upsetting. That makes our dah.

 

They were totally non threatening to congressional peoples

 

You're clearly oblivious to this: https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/...attendees-leaving-trump-speech-at-white-house

 

I don’t know? Did Hillary really win in 2016 because Russian collusion? Don’t ask ME. Ask her, Democrats and the rest of the MSM who claimed he never really won for 4 years, until the courts proved them wrong. But it’s only a BIG LIE if Trump makes accusations?

And yes Trump lost. But not unexpected considering the forces at play.

 

You brought it up, you can't prove it. Hence i remains your burden of prove, and not my burden of prove.
Since you got nothing to add to this,.. means you have lost the point. I'll not respond to this again.

You think your source is proving it was peacefully, while it clearly states that the speech was "a call to fight and save the country."
Your source says your wrong.
The entire article is about saying Donald is responsible of what went on.
It is proving my point. Thanks.

You brought it up, you can't prove it. Hence i remains your burden of prove, and not my burden of prove.
Since you got nothing to add to this,.. means you have lost the point. I'll not respond to this again.

No buts. He didn't leave them out, and so he expressed his love to them fascists who attacked the Capitol.

 

You're just moving goalpost away from that cops beat up peaceful protesters, to if protesters have a right to defend their 1st amendment rights against an oppressive government.

I asked you to source that the beating away of peaceful protesters had to do with extending the perimeter, and you're not sourcing a thing.

As far as I can see, there are no grounds for the cops to beat people away expressing their 1st amendment rights.
Being able to express your 1st amendment rights is a major thing.

I got my independent sources as well.

So it's your problem that you cant prove a thing.

 

Your not putting a dent in my point
Cops do not shoot violent white fascist busy killing them,
while not having a problem shooting a black man fleeing.

You're moving the goalpost from "Yet you claim that there is a connection between Trump and Proud Boys." to "Trump is part of Proud Boys"

 

Hillary and Russian collusion. Burp?
The forces at play ? I’d say seven million and losing the senate means Trump,is a loser. The last election, anyone but Trump would have won. He’s a sicko.

 

Washington examiner ? Wow. Why not use fix news and Tucker.
These fly by night conservative rags are just north of the checkout counter make up sht rags. Get real.,

 

Really ? You don’t know who won the last election ? I hope you don’t expect to be taken seriously from here on out .

 

So you're saying that people did NOT harass people leaving the White House? Even though there is video evidence?