Chairman Comer Invites President Biden to Testify Before the Oversight Committee

Nonsense. That is NOT how it works.

Comer wants to bring charges. And, he has TOTALLY FAILED to identify charges and provide evidence.

NOBODY has to prove Comer wrong. This is totally on Comer, who has to bring real charges and real evidence.

Unfortunately for America, he is a congressman AND he is a TOTAL fraud.

 

It's adorable that y'all believe Ole Joe is afraid of that mango, traitorous criminal, piece of monkey ****. Do y'all just pretend that Ole Joe didn't take trumps ass to the wood shed during the debates in 2020? LOL

 

See post #72 for clarification.

 

Yes criminal evidence still waiting for it to be refuted and the legitimate purpose confirmed.

 

I don't belive Trump was ever subpoenaed as was Hunter even invited and as I recall Trump was attacked for not appearing even though he was the target of a criminal investigation which you claim Biden is not.

 

Yes, the “mountain of evidence” is.too overwhelming!

 

Why did you leave out testimony and records?

Yes when you are charged with a crime and evidence us presented supporting that charge you can ne silent and present ni defense....andnyou most likely will be convicted when that evidence is no rebuted in your defense.

So what have the Biden's presented to refute the evidence they were enegaged in influence peddling and they were un fact providing a legitimate product or service and what was it?
Seriously, you guys need to deal with the reality here, which is that there is no evidence, there never was. If they had evidence, they would subpoena his appearance. Actually, he would already have been impeached.

From a Paul Simon song:

And if I was the president,
the minute that Congress called my name,
I'd say "now who do ... who do you think you're foolin'?"[/QUOTE]

 

It's not mine I didn't testify nor investigate and the evidence remains.

 

Nope as testified to in the hearings.

What was the legitimate business or service?

 

And specious denials refute nothing.

 

Qre you claiming ni witnesses testified now......your knowledge of events and evidence makes it impossible to even try to have a discussion with you.

 

Because he is under an ongoing impeachment.

Why shouldn't Biden explain to the country why his family was recieving tens if millions in cash from our worst foreign adversaries for no explained or explainble reason other than bribery and influence peddling and why he lied when he claimed no knowledge or role in it?

 

With no Articles of Impeachment forthcoming and no subpoena from Gomer and Gym, Joe Biden and his family should ignore any "invitations" from the Republican propaganda committee. They do not represent the people of the USA. The represent their Republican party boss's and a small faction of MAGA fanatics wishes to do a political hatchet job on a Democratic president who beat their Orange felon in a free, fair and secure election. They also have an interest in revenge politics since their felon was impeached twice and then let go by a partisan Republican Senate who didn't even hear any evidence or witnesses.

Now that the committee has failed so utterly:

No explanations are required.
No "clearing up" is required.

I would be pleased if every member of the Biden family passed thru the hearing room for the sole purpose of flipping Gomer and his Gomer-ettes the bird and
then walking out.

Sadly, this won't happen.

 

Comer can't bring charges.... only the involved and corrupt DOJ can bring charges.... Comer can write referrals....Comer can impeach....Comer can write legislation to make sure this corruption is never covered up again in our government........

. but the best part....

Comer is playing the same game Pelosi played..... the "court of public opinion"... get the corruption into the sunlight and let the voters decide in November... he has enough to impeach now.... he has uncovered and made public "mucho" bank accounts and receipt and testimony and SAR's and emails and text and Whatsapp and meetings and testimony and checks.....

I find it so funny you keep referring to Comer.... this was never Comer's job... Comer is just uncovering the corrupt DOJ in his oversight..... the involved and corrupt DOJ had this stuff for years... they do investigations.... they have all the cute little tools to play with that we bought for them... it is their job to take these "bank accounts and receipt and testimony and SAR's and emails and text and Whatsapp and meetings and testimony and checks" and investigate.....

Nancy Mace nails it...
The real question you might ask yourself.... why the DOJ has not "got off their asses" and investigate Joe or Hunter?
But Nancy Mace literally said just that...
Nancy Mace nails it on the head...
""The DOJ needs to get off its ass and investigate... we've done the work for them so they can not screw it up now""
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/LmD-BH_Qt0Q
https://rumble.com/v2n1vsa-rep.-nancy-mace-doj-needs-to-get-off-its-ass-and-investigate.html

 

He wanted to impeach Biden. That has nothing to do with the DOJ.

He didn't have enough evidence for a subpoena, let alone for the DOJ or impeachment.

Plus, those he called as really serious witnesses turned out to be enemies of the state!!

 

Actually all Comer is doing is following Pelosi's lead..... impeachment or criminal convictions are secondary...
To uncover the truth to the public and the American voters is the smarter move..... and he has done that quite well.... something the left can not deny or refute... all documented and made public...

Comer has more than enough evidence for the DOJ and impeachment. ....and the authority for the subpoena...

All documented and available upon request.

 

I guess I have to ask whether you think the DOJ is involved in impeachment.

A subpoena has to have more than the authority. A subpoena must be justified.

After being embarrassed over and over again, Comer admits he's got no case for impeachment - not even for the absolutely wack-a-doodle House.

Why should I look at documents that not even Comer believes in?

 

How does one respond to zero evidence? Their primary witness was convicted of making it all up.

Come on, Steve, this was never anything other than the GOP scraping any barrel they can find to spill dirt, any dirt, on Biden. The MAGA elites need something to poke at until the election. This is all they have, a pathetic nothing. Even Comer has given up on the impeachment.

https://newrepublic.com/post/180126/james-comer-admits-defeat-biden-impeachment

 

There is no criminal evidence, ffs!

 

Sigh ...

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politi...ating the,a series of corresponding documents.

They went soft on him and allowed him to provide written answers to questions, remember? There was actual evidence, enough to warrant a subpoena. There is none against Biden.

 

Joe Biden has not been charged with a crime. Not even a misdemeanor.

There is no evidence, just a lot of sketchy emails and partial documents, like the endless nonsense that @popscott continually pastes into every thread about the Bidens.

 

Aren't you curious about how Biden's entire family, included his grandkids, received money from foreign countries, especially when questions have been raised? It would sure be nice if Biden could answer those questions and put this to bed.

 

The burden of proof in on the accusers, not the target. Biden doesn't have to prove a damned thing. That isn't how the system works, and never has been.

 

Where did I say there were no witnesses? Did you pull that out of your derriere? I said that their long-awaited super smoking gun witness turned out to be a lying sack. There were others:

https://www.npr.org/2023/09/28/1202010186/biden-impeachment-inquiry-hearing

Forensic accountant Bruce Dubinsky, one of the witnesses brought by Republicans, said, "I am not here today to even suggest that there was corruption, fraud or wrongdoing. More information needs to be gathered before I can make such an assessment."

Law professor Jonathan Turley, also a Republican witness, said in his prepared statement: "I have previously stated that, while I believe that an impeachment inquiry is warranted, I do not believe that the evidence currently meets the standard of a high crime and misdemeanor needed for an article of impeachment. The purpose of my testimony today is to discuss how past inquiries pursued evidence of potentially impeachable conduct."

Please don't ever accuse me of ignorance again in that snarky manner. It should be obvious to anyone reading that that you're repeating MAGA nonsense and I'm refuting it quite successfully. If you can't take it and remain civil, then stop posting replies to me. I can do this until the proverbial cows come home.

 

Because it's all bullshit. Why don't you get that?

The Conspiracy Theories forum is thataway ----->