Chairman Comer Invites President Biden to Testify Before the Oversight Committee

What's "it"?

 

More nonsense. This proves nothing. None of it does, no matter how many times you paste it in.

 

The sketchy emails are the ones that YOU keep pasting in to every thread about this ridiculous, lame issue. Why would I follow those same links over and over? Been there, done that.

FFS, if any of that were actual evidence against anyone named Biden, Comer and Jordan and their slimy little butt buddies on that committee would already have formally requested that the DOJ take up the matter. This nonsense has been "under investigation" for years at taxpayer expense. It's worse than the eight congressional investigations on Benghazi and their desperate need to find fault with Hillary over it.

You are wasting your time haranguing me on this. I will not be convinced by conspiracy theory bullshit, which is what you keep posting. Give it a rest, please.

 

Got copies right here, you should try reading them and watching the hearings.

 

He didn't and couldn't produce anything to show for it. If I missed it please quote it.

 

"Mountain of evidence". I've read them; hence my comments. There's nothing there.

BBbbbut "the Bidens" (or the "Biden's" as you like to say) is utterly meaningless.

 

In the committee reports and all the previous citations to you...................why do you keep demanding repeat posting and denials there were actual hearings into the matter?

 

OH well THAT refutes everything!!!!!..........................

 

You should have stopped with the part I enlarged. Why does it shock anyone that folks in DC use their positions to enrich themselves and their friends/family? I don't care if it's Biden or anyone else. This is S.O.P. for DC and we the folks tolerate it. I'm tired of Kabuki theater from both sides of the aisle.

 

Stop misquoting Truley as I have already posted, he believes there is ample evidence for a criminal charge and impeachment.


....Rep. Stephen Lynch (D., Mass.) just stated that the Republican legal experts said that there was no evidence to even suggest that President Biden may have committed impeachable offenses. That appears a reference to me and it is untrue...

......I stated that there was "ample" evidence for an impeachment inquiry based on the existing evidence and, if proven, some of these allegations would be a credible basis for impeachment.

........My point was that an impeachment inquiry should not start with a presumption of impeachable conduct and that I was not making such a presumption. The sole question was whether an inquiry was warranted and I testified that it was...

........Moreover, the Committee was aware that was my position before their invited me to testify. To declare impeachable acts at the very start of an inquiry would have prejudged the evidence. I repeatedly laid out before and after that committee potential impeachable offenses.

........Rep. Raskin (D., Md.) just stated that that I testified with other witnesses that "nothing woudl approach" an impeachable offense in this inquiry. That again is not true. I said that opposite. I stated that there was ample evidence for the inquiry and, if proven, the…

https://twitter.com/JonathanTurley/status/1770474084389802220


Bruce Dubinsky tesitmony - he was not there as a fact witness or and investigator into criminal charges against the Biden's

First at the outset, let me state unequivocally, and in no uncertain terms, that I agreed to tes fy today, not because I have a poli cal agenda or axe to grind, because I do not. Rather I agreed to testify in this proceeding in order to help this committee and the American people gain a better understanding on how frauds are commited, how complex business arrangements using Limited Liability Companies, (many of those LLC’s being shell companies), are used in frauds, and how money is moved by fraudsters to facilitate the conduct of illicit activity.

...As the age-old proverb goes, where there’s smoke, there’s fire. As a fraud investigator when I see smoke, I immediately look for the fire. The critical question facing the American people today is whether behind the smokescreen clouding the Biden family and associates’ businesses was there, or is there a fire? And if there was or is a fire, how big is that fire? Why were members of the Biden family and close business associates receiving millions of dollars of payments from foreign entities and individuals? What services, if any, were being provided? What was the substance of the alleged services being provided? Was the money being paid a fair amount commensurate with those services? Were political favors being traded and disguised as services? These are the questions that, as a forensic accountant, I routinely am tasked to answer when I am hired to investigate allegations of fraud and corruption. There is a great deal of evidence that has been collected to date by this Committee and others, trying to answer these questions.”

You are conflating testimony to gather information of what is fraud, bribery and influence peddling with an impeachment hearing.

 

house.gov

 

He answered the questions. You may not like the answers, but he answered.

Bottom line: Joe Biden never received anything in relation to Hunter’s business, or provided any benefit to Hunter’s business deals.

 

I do not ask for repeated postings. I repeatedly ask for proof. It isn't my fault if I keep getting the same nonsense in reply.

I deny no such thing. The hearings produced nothing. The right has been at this since 2019 when Biden announced his candidacy. If they haven't found proof by now, either they are all incompetent nincompoops or there's nothing to find but bits and pieces that simply will not add up to criminal intent or activity. Deal with it, pretty please, and stop harassing me about it.

 

Do you know the best thing about beating your head against a wall? It feels really good when you stop. Try it.

 

Not even gonna read all that. More innuendo and conjecture, with added name-dropping that I assume us supposed to impress. It doesn't.

The right has had at least five freaking years to connect the dots, but they simply will not connect the way y'all want them to.

 

Then what was his answer cauese I have read it the takeaways and analysis amd the committee members themselves re still seeking anamswer. What records did he produce to refute the evidence of influence peddling? None of the people who actuay ran he companies could identify one.

So Im all ears explain it to me because I don't think yoh can.

 

That isn't a link. I will not do your homework.

 

OH well THAT refutes everything!!!

 

https://search.house.gov/?search=Impeachment

Do yours

 

Do you by chance know how to link in a PDF file? Because there is one that I think you should see that goes through each accusation/piece of possible evidence that Comer's committee investigated, but I don't know how to link to it here.

 

Try pages 52 and 55 of the transcript, for a start. That explains some of the payments.

And there’s this:

 

I really wish you righties felt the same about Ivanka and Jareds BILLION $$$$ payday

But since your all still The Biden Crime Family, show us the money, if you had the evidence you would have impeached him by now and you know it. But the inuendo lies are better politics in the court of public opinion then they are in the actual court......

 

It proves you, once again, have no rebuttal and can not back up your claims. sad to say the least....

 

How many democrats are complaining about Ivanka and Jared? Democrats control the DOJ, if there was something wrong we would have heard about it by now. Even Schiff isn't complaining about this.

 

Dems dont use the DOJ or legislative branch to go after family like republicans.