This is something straight out of YOUR playbook in that you go along and assert something and then when I prove you wrong, you just sweep it under...
and for ALL of the people who supported the "mostly windows" statement about the WTC tower wall, where is my apology for that fiasco? Cuts both...
I proved with the actual figures about how the wall of the WTC towers was less than 1/3 window and nobody so much as gave me an acknowledgement of...
and you picture there is intended to prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that "FLT11" & "FLT175" were indeed hijacked and flown into the twin towers?...
in the case of an airliner striking a wall, the airliner would undergo HUGE stress and because of this huge stress, have damage to the aircraft...
So the truther community is expected to come up with an explanation as to why fire could not possibly have removed ALL of the structure, and ALL...
Note that in other airline disasters ( or for that matter 2 space shuttle disasters ) the bits of the aircraft are collected up and spread out on...
and it doesn't strike you as crazy the idea that the aircraft should retain its shape as it crashes into a wall so as to make a plane shaped hole...
The fact of the free fall acceleration and the condition of the building while it fell, is all the evidence needed to conclude that the structure...
NO, you are missing the point, the fact of 2.25 sec of free fall acceleration + the fact that the north west corner can be seen to remain vertical...
argument from incredulity...... also the fact that the North & West walls are seen descending at Free-Fall acceleration, proves beyond any doubt...
http://www.ae911truth.org/en/news-section/41-articles/905-911-debate-challenge-credentialed-professionals-need-only-apply.html Do you know any...
Can you be specific, that is at what point did I fail? I have quoted a WIKI article that specifies the Power increase by the CUBE of the velocity,...
So people can "eyeball" a scene and get better accuracy than with real measurements & calculations....(?) The statement that "FLT175" would be...
Separate names with a comma.