What do they DO to people like Hillary Clinton?

Discussion in 'Latest US & World News' started by Jack Napier, Jul 6, 2012.

  1. Jack Napier

    Jack Napier Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2011
    Messages:
    40,439
    Likes Received:
    207
    Trophy Points:
    0

    Aside from increasing social disorder and riots, which we are going to see surface again, any time later this year, or early next, it's still not going to descend into conventional revolultion, for the reasons that I cited before.

    You want to help clean up the entire British political system, thereby enforcing a change, one in which people can claim more of the power, and keep most of their wealth, to invest building our nation up?

    Then set yourself one objective, one goal- to be part of a common voice, that explains and campaigns not to vote, today, not voting is the best expression of freedom that we have.

    Imagine if even a tier of 1,0000 dedicated people, not going on silly marches, dear oh dear, this is not the 60's, but pooling their collective skills, to get out the 'DON'T VOTE - THE GAME IS RIGGED' message, to just 50million people, less if you factor out kids etc. And who do those 1000 know, to call upon for favours? Printing, web design, etc, etc, it is limited to your own imagination, but with just 1000 dedicated, in a few years, this message would be right in the face of everone, cornering them into really thinking, and hopefully, moving toward a total rejection of the system.

    That is possible, we should aim for that.
     
  2. Jack Napier

    Jack Napier Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2011
    Messages:
    40,439
    Likes Received:
    207
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I would check your figures back out, and perhaps not by way of a low res pic.

    All it proves anyway, is that you also give aid to other countries.

    Last time I looked, your media was not written from an Egyptian perspective, half your sentate are not Egyptian Muslim but also Americans, and the chairman of the Fed AND his assistant, were not Hindu.

    Goldman Sachs and other financial terrorists, they are not Sikh or Muslim banks.
     
  3. Durandal

    Durandal Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    May 25, 2012
    Messages:
    55,900
    Likes Received:
    27,420
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Hilarity was talking about "obliteration" in response to a nuclear attack on Israel by Iran. Such an attack would call for a strong response..
     
  4. Jack Napier

    Jack Napier Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2011
    Messages:
    40,439
    Likes Received:
    207
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Why?

    A) Iran do not have nukes.

    B) Iran have no known desire to have nukes.

    C) Iran have never invaded ANY country, for over three centuries.

    D) Even allowing for ALL of that, the question did not ask about any attack on the US. Just the Jew state. Look how her eyes bulge, as she gets a picture of Netenyahu's mutilated manhood, in her mind.
     
  5. GodTom

    GodTom Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2011
    Messages:
    2,537
    Likes Received:
    53
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Then why do we give muslims aid at all?
     
  6. Durandal

    Durandal Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    May 25, 2012
    Messages:
    55,900
    Likes Received:
    27,420
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    From "Brother Nathanael's" site:

    The Brother Nathanael Foundation envisions an America that is Christian in its consciousness and wholesome in its culture.

    The Foundation will support work that enables individuals and institutions to access the resources needed to take America back from the forces that are destroying our nation.

    Whether its litigating for Christian symbols in the public square, creating and helping media outlets with factual news, or publishing books that will bypass the censors who fear truthful content, the Brother Nathanael Foundation will be there.

    Come, let's work together to build a Christian America!


    Why is his solution to the perceived problem to try and turn us theocratic? That's not the solution.
     
  7. Jack Napier

    Jack Napier Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2011
    Messages:
    40,439
    Likes Received:
    207
    Trophy Points:
    0

    I don't see anything esp wrong with that, notwithstanding, it was more about the content of what he said.

    I don't see that he is calling for a theocracy, but asking Americans to be more TRULY 'Christian'.

    Rather than misled away from their own religion.
     
  8. Durandal

    Durandal Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    May 25, 2012
    Messages:
    55,900
    Likes Received:
    27,420
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    You're biased the same way he is. It won't do us any good to be "Christian" in response to a nation politically co-opted. We don't need any religion whatsoever to combat that.

    I get the impression that this guy would like to take on the Zionists by creating an American theocratic dictatorship à la V for Vendetta. And you support the notion as a Christian. This is why religion and religious people are dangerous.. They think their religion trumps all else.
     
  9. Jack Napier

    Jack Napier Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2011
    Messages:
    40,439
    Likes Received:
    207
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Biased in favor of who?

    If you would bother to listen to the names, cites, examples etc, that he gives, in just that one bit of footage, alone, you could go check, couldn't you, and if it checks out, then you would know why it IS peritent to the thread.

    Why don't you do that, rather than be sidetracked by the fact that he is Christian?

    Why not pay comment to the detail of his messages?
     
  10. Jack Napier

    Jack Napier Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2011
    Messages:
    40,439
    Likes Received:
    207
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Question.

    What WOULD it take for you to admit any of the following?


    1) That US Presidential candidates can appear to differ on points, but they MUST, no question, ALWAYS bow to their true masters - Israel?

    2) That a conflict with Iran, would NOT be in the interests of American people, or 'national security'?

    3) That such a conflict, would benefit.....Israel, and that they are lobbying, quite aggressively, for YOUR country to do it. They are even whinging that you are not doing it quite as fast as they would have wanted.

    4) That Zionist Jews are placed in ALL key areas, of all key parts of a nation, for example, chairman of Fed Reserve, or chief of staff, etc?

    5) That the Zionist ecomony could not flourish, without being propped up by American and Germany money.

    6) That Israel are about the poorest ally, a nation could have. They just cause you loss, of your money, and your own soldiers. And they stand back, and let America take ALL the flak for it. It isn't entirely about $$$ people, if it were ONLY about that, then it would logically make more sense for the US elite to actually allies with Iran, over Israel, for example. Iran are rich in natural resource, while Israel have oranges. So, it is more than just about some rich blokes, it IS about funding Jewish extremism and their state, otherwise, it would make more sense to have others as allies.
     
  11. GodTom

    GodTom Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2011
    Messages:
    2,537
    Likes Received:
    53
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Jack if israel runs the us then why do we give aid to islamists?
     
  12. GodTom

    GodTom Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2011
    Messages:
    2,537
    Likes Received:
    53
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Jack you do know there are arab lobbyists in america right?
     
  13. Jack Napier

    Jack Napier Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2011
    Messages:
    40,439
    Likes Received:
    207
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Not because you don't have a Jewish Gov, in practice.

    And not out of benevolence, I will give you that.

    I guess that leaves bribery, to shills, didn't work with the Egyptians in the end, they got rid of their shill, they don't mess around.
     
  14. Jack Napier

    Jack Napier Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2011
    Messages:
    40,439
    Likes Received:
    207
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I am sure there are.

    Name me a lobby group as powerful as AIPAC?
     
  15. Mandrake

    Mandrake New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2009
    Messages:
    3,063
    Likes Received:
    50
    Trophy Points:
    0
    We give a lot of cash aid to muslim countries, especially to the Palestinians. If we cut off aid to them, they would probably either starve to death of have to go live elswewhere. I think Israel would really like it if we cut off aid to the Palestinians. I guess they don't control us like the kooks think they do.:nana:
     
  16. GodTom

    GodTom Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2011
    Messages:
    2,537
    Likes Received:
    53
    Trophy Points:
    48
    What are you talking about?

    The egyptians, happily, just took 1.5 billion of our money.

    And without congress approval...
     
  17. GodTom

    GodTom Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2011
    Messages:
    2,537
    Likes Received:
    53
    Trophy Points:
    48
    The Nra blows aipac out of the water.
     
  18. John1735

    John1735 Banned Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2009
    Messages:
    6,521
    Likes Received:
    76
    Trophy Points:
    0
    There is just one small difference.

    Hillary is not a President of a nation in control of it's armed forces. Aterroristinadinnerjacket of Iran is.

    Oh and yes she's a nutjob, this whole administration is, from our wonderful president on down. Frankly one is surprised some are just now taking notice of that fact.
     
  19. John1735

    John1735 Banned Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2009
    Messages:
    6,521
    Likes Received:
    76
    Trophy Points:
    0
    CAIR. Anymore questions?
     
  20. Jack Napier

    Jack Napier Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2011
    Messages:
    40,439
    Likes Received:
    207
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Some aren't even doing that.
     
  21. Jack Napier

    Jack Napier Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2011
    Messages:
    40,439
    Likes Received:
    207
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Get real.
     
  22. GodTom

    GodTom Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2011
    Messages:
    2,537
    Likes Received:
    53
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Union lobbyists blow the aipac out of the water aswell
     
  23. Jack Napier

    Jack Napier Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2011
    Messages:
    40,439
    Likes Received:
    207
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Powerful.

    But not even close.
     
  24. Jack Napier

    Jack Napier Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2011
    Messages:
    40,439
    Likes Received:
    207
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Nope.

    Nowhere near.

    AIPAC are not even really 'lobbyists'.
     
  25. GodTom

    GodTom Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2011
    Messages:
    2,537
    Likes Received:
    53
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Then why did you ask me who is a more powerful lobbyist
     

Share This Page