Cancel the russia "investigation"

Discussion in 'Political Opinions & Beliefs' started by bradt93, Jun 12, 2017.

  1. APACHERAT

    APACHERAT Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2013
    Messages:
    38,026
    Likes Received:
    16,042
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male

    The liberals PC Tailhook witch hunt was a classic all in the name of political correctness.
     
    RodB likes this.
  2. Abandon

    Abandon Member

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2016
    Messages:
    237
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Trump shot himself in the foot.

    His people jumbed in to assure us that he didn't share intelect with Russia, he came out and admitted it on Twitter.

    His people jumped in to convince us all the firing was unrelated to the Russia investigation, then he came out on camera and admitted it.

    The ****.
     
  3. Lesh

    Lesh Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2015
    Messages:
    42,206
    Likes Received:
    14,119
    Trophy Points:
    113
    None of that was a crime...but yea...we had about 14 investigations
     
  4. thinkitout

    thinkitout Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2014
    Messages:
    4,897
    Likes Received:
    1,273
    Trophy Points:
    113
    GOOD ANSWER!!!. . . . I left myself wide open. . . . But I was referring to ALL information held by the FBI, including sensitive or classified documents. . . . Otherwise, what would be the significance of "leaks"???
     
  5. thinkitout

    thinkitout Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2014
    Messages:
    4,897
    Likes Received:
    1,273
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Of course, Trump has NEVER been guilty of impulsive pre-judgment. . . .

    ?????????????????
     
  6. RodB

    RodB Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2015
    Messages:
    22,537
    Likes Received:
    11,216
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    NEWS FLASH: I'll go slow; try to keep up. Watergate all started WITH A CRIME!
    "claiming there is only an investigation if there is.... no....dead body laying on the floor is" called a witch hunt.
     
  7. APACHERAT

    APACHERAT Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2013
    Messages:
    38,026
    Likes Received:
    16,042
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male

    14 investigations you say ?

    What was learned ?

    Lying isn't a crime unless you are under oath ?

    And if you lie under oath the Obama DOJ will not prosecute if you lied to protect the community organizer.

    We learned that it was Al Qaeda factions who planned in advance to attack the consulate in Benghazi while less than 24 hours later President Obama would lie to the American people at a reelection rally in Las Vegas, Nv. that "Al Qaeda was being decimated" and "was on the run." Obama's reelection platform was all a lie.

    We learned from Hillary's emails that while the terrorist attack was still in progress in Benghazi that Hillary e-mailed Chelsea confirming that there was a terrorist attack taking place then Hillary would lie afterwards. It's all here. -> https://wikileaks.org/clinton-emails/

    We learned that U.S. Air Force pilots waited on the Tarmac in Italy for orders that never came to respond.
    http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...-speaks-out-on-stalled-benghazi-response.html

    We learned that U.S. Marines sat inside a C-130 on the tarmac in Spain changing in and out of uniform for four hours while the fighting was taking place for 13 hours.
    https://www.marinecorpstimes.com/st...weapons-and-uniforms-commander-says/86478466/
    http://www.military.com/daily-news/...-marines-response-slowed-uniform-changes.html


    We learned that the U.S. consulate wasn't really a consulate but a front for "Obama's Guns R Us" that the Obama administration was in the gun running business. You know, arming Al Qaeda and ISIS.

    We learned the six surviving members of CIA contractors security team who fought to defend the American diplomatic compound in Benghazi, were ordered by the Obama White House to stand down and not to respond to the terrorist attack were denied to testify under oath. But their story would get out. Since these CIA security contractors didn't fall under the UCMJ they ignored the Obama White House orders to stand down.



    We learned that a couple of generals and a flag officer told the truth and the Obama White House conducted a witch hunt and these officers were purged from the military.

    We learned any officer who lied even under oath to protect Obama became "yes men" and promoted.

    We learned what most of us who are well informed already knew that Susan Rice is a liar and has been a liar for Democrats for years.

    What we learned was that the Obama White House and State Department lied and conducted a cover up.
     
    Last edited: Jun 17, 2017
    Matthewthf and RodB like this.
  8. snakestretcher

    snakestretcher Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2010
    Messages:
    43,996
    Likes Received:
    1,706
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You mean evidence that you haven't seen? Doesn't mean there is none, does it? There's enough of a stink around this administration to suggest something rotten needs to be rooted out. I have never known anything like this since Iran-Contra and Watergate. I seem to recall the 'nothing to see here' dismissals from conservatives back then as well.
     
  9. snakestretcher

    snakestretcher Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2010
    Messages:
    43,996
    Likes Received:
    1,706
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No. Watergate began with suspicion that something wasn't quite right. That suspicion then generated an investigation no different to what you're enjoying today. Or not.
     
  10. RodB

    RodB Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2015
    Messages:
    22,537
    Likes Received:
    11,216
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    If this was devastating what would it have been if Comey instead recommended indictment and a grand jury for felonies as he should have?

    All I am saying is that "the Russians did it" is included in Clinton's long list of excuses.
    I have no doubt there was hacking; there is a possibility that Russia did some; I have no idea if it derailed her campaign, in fact my guess is that Russia would have preferred Clinton, but none-the-less Clinton though the Russians were damaging.
     
  11. Matthewthf

    Matthewthf Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2016
    Messages:
    6,923
    Likes Received:
    4,269
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    There is no such thing as free and fair when it comes to the DNC. Not including illegals the DNC will do anything including cheating to win. Russia and Wikileaks if they had any influence (I have not seen any evidence) do not come close to comparing to the corrupt DNC party.
     
  12. APACHERAT

    APACHERAT Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2013
    Messages:
    38,026
    Likes Received:
    16,042
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male

    Maybe those documents will soon be on the FBI website ?

    Breaking news...just reported yesterday.


    The CIA also has its "Freedom of Information Act Electronic Reading Room." A whole crap load of declassified information that still hasn't become public and made it into the history books. -> https://www.cia.gov/library/readingroom/
     
  13. RodB

    RodB Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2015
    Messages:
    22,537
    Likes Received:
    11,216
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    I'll go slow. CONDUCTING A FORMAL INVESTIGATION WITHOUT A CRIME IS CALLED A WITCH HUNT. CONDUCTING A FORMAL INVESTIGATION WITHOUT A CRIME BUT WITH THE SUSPICION OF ONE IS CALLED..... wait for it...... A WITCH HUNT. What police states do routinely to rid themselves of political opponents.
     
    Matthewthf and APACHERAT like this.
  14. Matthewthf

    Matthewthf Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2016
    Messages:
    6,923
    Likes Received:
    4,269
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Comey admitted he could have gone after Hillary. She was given three weeks to delete the evidence after she was ordered to turn it over to the FBI. Many FBI members were disgusted with how Comey ran the investigation and 1 was on Fox News says he told his own children he could not vote for Hillary because he knew she was an evil criminal.

    Bill Clinton RAPED women. We have proof he payed at least one women he raped off. Hillary Clinton attacked these women that came forward to speak about it. Bill took blow jobs from Monica while president and then gave the girl a job at the Pentagon. Hillary defended him.

    Hillary was linked to the death of Vincent Foster but the evidence linking her according to the FBI who linked her to the death disappeared. Where did it go? Files from Bill's computer have also disappeared before. There was also Benghazi and the death of Chris Stevens.

    So we had every right to go after Hillary. Hillary is a CRIMINAL. Nothing you say will change that. Don't give her a free pass like Comey and the DNC did.
     
    RodB likes this.
  15. APACHERAT

    APACHERAT Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2013
    Messages:
    38,026
    Likes Received:
    16,042
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male

    An nobody was killed during the third rate burglary of the DNC HQ's.
     
  16. Matthewthf

    Matthewthf Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2016
    Messages:
    6,923
    Likes Received:
    4,269
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Russia and Wikileaks if they had any influence on the election did not change a single vote so you stop the crap. It is not a crime to show mistakes and wrongdoings of anyone who is running for president. She was a criminal and we have every right to expose her to the public.

    If you don't like the truth then go cry to your mommy. The truth hurts. Russia did not change anything so get over it already.
     
    navigator2 likes this.
  17. Matthewthf

    Matthewthf Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2016
    Messages:
    6,923
    Likes Received:
    4,269
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    We don't care about Russia because they had nothing to do with anyones votes. Did Russia force anyone to vote for Trump? Did Russia's Influence anyone to vote for Trump? NO. So quit crying already.

    There is nothing wrong with showing the public the wrongdoings of someone running for president. You don't get to take that away from us.
     
  18. RodB

    RodB Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2015
    Messages:
    22,537
    Likes Received:
    11,216
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Revise history all you want but leave me out of it please.
     
  19. Matthewthf

    Matthewthf Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2016
    Messages:
    6,923
    Likes Received:
    4,269
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    His taxes are probably not that scary but even so it would not compare to anything Hillary did and the Democrats were fine with her so this stupid crap needs to stop. The left is so unfair giving Hillary free passes while going after Trump for every stupid little thing.

    Russia did not change a single vote. This is not as bad as the DNC is making it out to be. They are just sore losers.
     
  20. Matthewthf

    Matthewthf Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2016
    Messages:
    6,923
    Likes Received:
    4,269
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Yes but Russia did not change a single vote and the DNC payed crowdstrike to lie about Trump colluding. If the DNC wanted us to believe there had been some serious crimes done with Russia hacking they went about it in the worst possible way they could. Who would believe them after all of the lies? Maybe some people had ties to Russia but it still does not change the fact that Russia did not affect or change the outcome of the election.

    We already know why American's rejected Hillary. The blue collar working American's rejected her because of jobs and not Russia or Wikileaks. So this entire investigation is stupid. Go after Russia if you have a problem with them and leave Trump alone.

    Many liberals were calling for impeachment and were calling Trump a criminal. Yet he had nothing to do with Russia. it is not a crime to show the wrongdoings of Hillary Clinton and that was all Wikileaks did. I don't understand why so many hate Wikileaks when they did nothing wrong. Even if they hacked the DNC all they did was release the truth. The facts about Hillary are scary and we deserved to know the truth.
     
  21. Matthewthf

    Matthewthf Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2016
    Messages:
    6,923
    Likes Received:
    4,269
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    We already know what they will show. A few people may have had ties to Russia. Trump was not one of them. He is not a criminal like Hillary and he will not be impeached like Bill Clinton was.

    Russia did not change a single vote. There is nothing wrong with showing the truth about Hillary Clinton. The American people rejected Hillary for reasons that had nothing to do with Wikileaks or Russia. If you can't understand why she lost then let me explain it to you.

    The blue collar workers voted for Trump for jobs. Christians voted for Trump for obvious reasons and many voted for Trump because he was not Hillary. This investigation was started on a lie by crowdstrike payed by the DNC and it's stupid.

    It's funny that the Democrats want to get a few people for having maybe having ties with Russia when there are Democrats that have done the same thing. How many Democrats have ties with Russia? You're all just sore losers.

    Hillary sucked worse then my turds in the toilet. She put about as much effort into becoming president as a turd does floating in a toilet.
    Stop crying and move on already. The sore loser BS has got to stop already.
     
  22. Matthewthf

    Matthewthf Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2016
    Messages:
    6,923
    Likes Received:
    4,269
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    You are all sore losers. Russia did not change a single vote. If you can't understand why Hillary lost then go do your research.

    If no hacking would have happened Hillary still would have lost and you would still have Trump as our president. Stop crying already.
     
  23. Matthewthf

    Matthewthf Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2016
    Messages:
    6,923
    Likes Received:
    4,269
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    What EVIDENCE? The DNC payed crowdstrike to lie. Crowdstrike admitted that Russia may not have done the hacking. There is no evidence.

    You can't go after Republicans for being close with Russia when Democrats are guilty of the same crime. Comey admitted Trump did nothing wrong.

    Wikileaks exposed the wrongdoings of Hillary. I'm sorry if the truth hurts. I do not know a single person that was influenced by Wikileaks. The blue collar worker force voted for Trump for jobs, Christians voted for Trump for obvious reasons and many voted for Trump because he was not Hillary. Her e-mail scandal and the raping by Bill also did her in. She was evil and corrupt.

    She put as much effort into being president as a turd does floating around in a toilet. This sore loser BS has got to stop.

    So when the investigations are over you may get 1 or 2 people having ties with Russia and that's it. What then? This entire investigation is a waste of time. Russia and China have been hacking the US for over 10 years now and we hack them so get over it. This is nothing new.
     
  24. SillyAmerican

    SillyAmerican Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2016
    Messages:
    3,678
    Likes Received:
    1,285
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    I'm inclined to agree, for the following reasons:

    First, both Karl Rove and Mark Penn are saying that if there is no evidence of an underlying crime, the investigation should end.

    Second, three of the top legal minds in the country -- Ken Starr, Alan Dershowitz, and Jonathan Turley -- all say there is no obstruction of justice case to be made here.

    This is getting ridiculous. If there is evidence of wrongdoing, it should be looked into. But to open up an investigation in order to find something wrong? Sorry, that is wrong, and I defy anyone being capable of having a continuous investigation of their lives to find something wrong.

    If there needs to be a civil war in order to restore sanity to the way we do things, so be it. The idea that this "investigation" is justifiable is ludicrous. And just out of curiosity, if Mueller announces that there's nothing to these Russia charges, how long before you're calling for an investigation of the next thing? This is the textbook definition of the term "witch hunt".
     
  25. Matthewthf

    Matthewthf Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2016
    Messages:
    6,923
    Likes Received:
    4,269
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Hillary is a criminal and the Democrats and left are ok with this yet they complain about the most stupid things with Trump. Pathetic.
     
    APACHERAT likes this.

Share This Page