Climate deniers don't deny climate change any more

LOL... Yes, run away...

 

That's your issue, not mine. I'm only interested in the science and conclusions by professional scientists.

 

Then you better broaden your intake - there are myriad well qualified, published, climatologists that recognize climate warming - population growth and more societies with improving infrastructure and life style modernizations will do that.

The only article of your pseudo-religion most of us "deny" is the nonsense that we only have x number of days/months/years left until we all go up in flames. We also have looked at data over decades, and centuries and realize that as the US IPCC has said "
The climate system is a coupled non-linear chaotic system, and therefore the long-term prediction of future climate states is not possible.” IPCC 2001 AR3

 

Actually there are new studies that suggest increasing CO2 may have less and less affect on temperature; and, that within a decade or two increased CO2 may actually reduce temperature increases.

 

He certainly has contributed almost nothing in the way of either information or entertainment in hundreds of messages on this topic in the last three weeks.

 

And more and more climate change denying trolls crawl out from under their bridges.
But none of their continual trolling will change the fact that the increased atmospheric CO2 from human activity has caused the recent increases in global temperatures and climate changes in my lifetime. And fortunately fewer and fewer people are listening to their false hypotheses.

 

Not interested.

 

The moment you use that term, you admit that you are just makin' $#!+ up, and have disqualified yourself from serious discussion.

No, you have no interest whatever in realistic scientific research by honest, credible, competent scientists on the actual causes of recent global warming, and refuse to consider any.

 

That expression is proof that you are just makin' $#!+ up.

^^^ My nomination for Unconscious Self-Reference of the Month.

 

Yeah, I know facts and new information is forbidden in the religion of Climatism.

 

Bingo. Or interesting.

 

None of that guff and bluff changes the fact that all credible professional climatologists agree that the recent increases in atmospheric CO2 from human activity have increased global warming and climate change from the "greenhouse effect", and nothing you hypothesize will change that. And the only ones you are trying to fool with your continual trolling guff and bluff is just yourselves.

 

None of it changes the fact that all credible professional climatologists agree that the recent increases in atmospheric CO2 from human activity have increased global warming and climate change from the "greenhouse effect", and nothing you hypothesize will change that.

 

Bye bye, and have a nice run!!!

 

My bad. Picked wrong date from "The Eyring equation, developed in 1935, also expresses the relationship between rate and energy."

Yeah. I think they construct these climate models specifically to reach the results they desire as opposed to discovering the truth.

 

But it's better to be safe than sorry. Which is why burning fossil fuels is being replaced by renewable energy sources.
Which is why we recently replaced our gas water heater with an electric heat pump driven by our roof top solar system, and why our monthly electricity bill is still in credit, and our yearly electricity bill is less than $100.

 

The recent dramatic increase in CO2 and the corresponding minimal increase in temperature would indicate that the effect is minimal or non existent. Likely due to negative feedbacks of increased CO2

 

That's just your personal opinion.

And the global temperatures are still increasing because of the "green-house effect" of the increased atmospheric CO2 from human activity. Which is why our bureau of meteorology recently added an extra colour to it's temperature maps for shade temperatures over 45 degrees, and will add the colour black for shade temperatures over 48 degrees.
And it ain't over till the fat lady sings, or goes up in flames from the increasing global temperatures, and New York is under water and when the ice caps finish melting.

 

Yes, and I already stipulated that. The relevant scientific question -- in which you have not the slightest interest -- is how much.

And the only one you are trying to fool with your continual trolling guff and bluff is just yourself.

 

6 years left to 2030

 

An observation of the widely reported temperature and CO2 levels.

 

They instead have

"scary scenarios, make simplified, dramatic statements, and make little mention of any doubts we might have"

Theyve chosen effectiveness over honesty.

 

So what?

 

And your payments paying for all those modifications and electric appliances? what about energy storage?

 

Their superior have ordered those that question any fact or detail about catastrophic climate change shall be scorned and insulted.