Climate deniers don't deny climate change any more

That is a false claim.

 

Already presented.

 

Which is just an eye-blink on the paleoclimate charts showing a very strong correlation of global temperatures with the "green-house" effects of atmospheric CO2.

https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/sites/default/files/2021-11/8 - Temperature Change and Carbon Dioxide Change - FINAL OCT 2021.pdf#:~:text=One of the most remarkable aspects of the,carbon dioxide concentration goes up, temperature goes up.

 

Their attempt to equate them with holocaust deniers.

 

Correlation as opposed to causation.

 

So what relevence are salse dressings to the recent global warming from atmospheric CO2 increases by human activity?

Or are you hypothesizing that the recent global warming and climate change is caused by salse from volcanic eruptions? And if so, what is your scientific evidence to support your hypothesis?

 

Thanks for alerting me to the typo in time to correct it.

 

IOW the global warming events in the paleoclimate charts were caused by increases in atmospheric CO2.

 

And is it about salse from volcanic eruptions too?
Alas, however, there is no correlation between recent increases in global warming and solar activity in my childrens' lifetime, apart from a slight negative trend recently, and in stark comparison to the strong correlation of global warming with atmospheric CO2 from human activity.

 

And a solar battery system would allow us to go off grid and contribute nothing to solar warming.

 

IOW the recent increases in global temperatures in my lifetime were caused by increases in atmospheric CO2 from human activity.

 

No. Precisely the opposite. Why not address my actual statements instead of these "IOW"s of yours

 

No. Likely caused primarily by the earths Milankovitch cycles. Why not address my actual statements instead of these "IOW"s of yours

 

That's just your personal opinion, and doesn't change the scientific fact that the recent increases in global temperatures in my lifetime were caused by increases in atmospheric CO2 from human activity, and as confirmed by any credible professional climatologist.

 

Your personal hypothesis, however, doesn't change the scientific fact that the recent increases in global temperatures in my lifetime were caused by increases in atmospheric CO2 from human activity, and as confirmed by any credible professional climatologist.

 

Its not my hypothesis.

 

Either way, it's still just an hypothesis, and doesn't change the scientific fact that the recent increases in global temperatures in my lifetime were obviously caused by increases in atmospheric CO2 from human activity, and as confirmed by any credible professional climatologist.

 

For how long?

 

Until we kick the bucket.

 

AGW is a hypothesis. Unproven up to this point.

 

While Anti-Global-Warming is an hypothesis, global warming from increased atmospheric CO2 by human activity is a scientific fact, and as confirmed by any credible professional climatologist.

 

Yeah, most agree on about 1.5C over past century and a half; the also accredit CO2's contribution as about 3-5% of total.

In fact, some climatologists are projecting a diminishing CO2 with a possible down turn by 2050-2060

 

So what caused the global warming if you hypothesize that only 3-5% of the temperature rise was from atmospheric CO2 and the "green-house" effect? And do you think that it was the green fairies who did it?.

That's If CO2 from human activity is reduced. Either way, global temperatures will continue to rise as the permafrost melts and the stored CH4 is released.

 

Do you have any evidence that humans do not produce any CO2 from their activities?
If not, then it's a scientific fact that increased atmospheric CO2 from human activity increases global temperatures by the "green-house effect".