‘I was tossed out of the tribe’: climate scientist Judith Curry interviewed

And where you plagiarized it from.

http://www.dutchforce.com/~eforum/index.php?showtopic=24943&st=0&pid=211348&#entry211348

 

He insists that science never proves anything yet he acts as if he wants science to prove he is correct.

Funny person, that guy.

 

Well, he is absolutely certain based on logical fallacies.

 

Holy cow. You guys are hilarious with your "proof". LOL

 

Says the guy with his

 

But can you prove it? LOL

 

And that is the flaw in Ohm's law?

And you say it was easy?

You are siding with the poster that (livefree) tells you science has not proven anything.

Not even laws of science.

So why do you accept his claim he is showing us proof of AGW?

 

Lindzen on ‘97% consensus’:

Lindzen: “It was the narrative from the beginning. In 1998, [NASA’s James] Hansen made some vague remarks. Newsweek ran a cover that says all scientists agree. Now they never really tell you what they agree on. It is propaganda.”

“So all scientists agree it’s probably warmer now than it was at the end of the Little Ice Age. Almost all Scientists agree that if you add CO2 you will have some warming. Maybe very little warming. But it is propaganda to translate that into it is dangerous and we must reduce CO2 etc.

If you can make an ambiguous remark and you have people who will amplify it ‘they said it not me’ and he response of the political system is to increase your funding, what’s not to like?

If I look through my department, at least half of them keep mum. Just keep on doing your work, trying to figure out how it works.

MIT ‘has just announced that they see this bringing in $300 million bucks. It will support all sorts of things.’

http://www.climatedepot.com/2016/02...-lindzen-mocks-97-consensus-it-is-propaganda/

 

You guys are killing me. Lol

 

Well, those who have no curiosity, prove they do not understand any of the science, use logical fallacies for arguments, and that appear not to have two brain cells to rub together would appear to be in a death throw.

 

Get lindzen to say he proves things with science. Hilarious

 

Yes, what would a scientist of atmospheric physics that has won multiple awards know about science compared to you. Speaking of hilarious.

 

He would know science never proves anything!

 

So in other words, your are enthusiastically certain in AGW as opposed to a true scientist.

 

I find the evidence overwhelming....like a real scientist would

 

Hahahahahaha! You are a hoot. You have no clue about the science. You don't even know that observed science is not playing along very well. Your science comes from left wing media outlets.

 

I think this is probably over your head but give it a shot.

http://www.eike-klima-energie.eu/uploads/media/Frank_II_Uncertainties_fulltext.pdf
CONCLUSION

"The Climate Change Theory has been falsified and is therefore invalid"

 

Posters totally ignore (those who shout us down) that but for global warming, Yosemite Valley still would be encased in a glacier. But for warming, the Great Lakes would still be nothing more than ice. That New York City would be buried by ice.

I fail to see what is wrong with warming.

But to blame man, when nature did such a fine job all by itself is the stuff fools tell as fairy tales.

Man controls climate? That makes me laugh.

This is their claim. We, human beings, control climate so they intend to control climate using laws.

Politicians sure are arrogant.

 

It is just the latest vehicle to push the green agenda where global cooling and the population bomb failed to take hold. Now with very organized propaganda it has worked better but not like they would like. As the media and politicians have become more strident in their claim it is more sure and more urgent, in the public sphere it has become less of a concern to the public. It becomes a joke when all weather events from warming to freezing to the Antarctic gaining ice to drought to floods are all caused by their latest cause celeb. No proof is needed, just alarmist claims to stir public support of government control.

 

When the left tells us science never proves anything, then blurts out "except for the climate of Earth" it makes me laugh as it should all of us.

Why the argument if they are correct?

Take temperature for instance.

Look at the alarmist use of graphs or color models showing Earth temps.

They misuse such color models. While temps can sure be a tad higher, are they dangerously higher?

Why use red in the color models when all it takes to go from blue to red is such a tiny temp number?

If they used blue to red inside your home, as your heating system warms you up, you would seem to be in danger.

This is scare tactics.

Who gives a flying fig if it is 2 degrees warmer?

I don't see Al Gores prediction of Florida under the sea happening.

 

I agree.

Look, the nuts on the left come out swinging at us as if we want Earth to be in danger.

But thus far, they have not come close to showing Earth is in any danger. Not from humans at any rate.

How will Democrats manage to control the entire population of Earth? China has black air. What are Democrats doing about China's black air?

Giving me and you holy hell is not helping.

 

Are you frightened by the cold wave that hit the East Coast?

True story. I arrived on the East Coast in Feb 1964 and though cold, (around 26 degrees) at least there was no snow. Go there today. I hear the cars are buried with snow.

That is your AGW.

 

I do not have any trouble with alternate energy but in it's time, not forced by decree increasing the cost of living for the poorest on earth.

 

Found a meme for them.

 

so any updates from that added 120 PPM of CO2 yet? You know, the dangers of it?

BTW, why do we need a global temperature?