28th Amendment - Prohibition of Firearms

I would suggest the use of a dictionary.

 

That's the limit of his vocabulary skills. Two or three words. Something is the matter with that one. I don't know why his mom let's him use the computer unattended.

 

You have to consider that the “liberal” English teacher has to pervert actual meanings of words to make the “people” of the Second Amendment fit what was “Ted" Kennedy’s view. And in doing so “people” is like “my house is a ‘castle,’ when it is a beach bungalow.”

It is like defending Obama’s civilian national security force ignoring the costs inserted into the pie chart, not to mention AmeriCorps with Nukes (oh, wait, “powerful” doesn’t mean powerful).

Then they create word senses where none exist or demand acceptance of their sense of the word you used even if the context does not support it. And if you claim they are (*)(*)(*)(*)(*)rdly, you are a racist. Whatever you do, do not blacken (see Latin roots) or denigrate religious beliefs, that blacks are Kenites the descendants of Cain and the mark is upon, because their English teacher’s head might explode defining the word “others.”

 

Yes, they are dishonest and their tactics are really terrible and transparent. The only people they can fool are themselves.

 

I would suggest, the acquisition and possession, of a clue and a Cause.

- - - Updated - - -

y'all realize; you have nothing but fallacy to work with, right?

 

It is quite difficult to nor realize such, when with every post you continually prove yourself to be nothing but a fallacy with a limited vocabulary, and an inability to engage in basic communication.

 

Dumb proposal, I'd be more willing to support an amendment limiting the types of firearms available to civilians and standard every day civilian police forces. No reason run of the mill police departments across the nation should have access to military surplus equipment. To me the only possible result of that is the oppression of the citizenry, causing them to fear standing up against their own government for what is right.

 

in politics, that just means you are incompetent.

 

I reviewed his posts on another board-its the same gibberish including dozens of "fallacy for a cause" or the better aqueduct nonsense. a linguist friend I know suggested-half seriously, that the posting resembles an artificial intelligence program that isn't quite up to snuff

I figure its an attempt to cover for a lack of a cogent argument-jumbling English and using outdated or esoteric terms is a failed attempt to establish high intellect when in reality its to hide ignorance

 

The Lesley Ann Warren “clue” version would be nice, but if I could get the 79 Park Avenue bot that would be extra special.

I can work with these, Winchester USA Ammunition 40 S&W 180 Grain Jacketed Hollow Point, but I do have a small box of special shiny ones, mostly for show, because werewolves don’t exist, right?

 

Our Second Amendment declares what is necessary to the security of a free State. Why are we wasting money on "wars" on crime, drugs, poverty, and terror?