A woman who gets an abortion is like an Indian giver. She gives life, and then she yanks that life back. That's not very good etiquette.
The day every womb is created perfectly, the day no natural miscarriages occur, the day every egg is perfectly implanted, the day that every embryo reaches maturity ... that's the day I worry about the "etiquette" of abortions.
Sudden Infant Death Syndrome has been known to sometimes happen too. There's a difference between an act of nature beyond our control and intentional termination. Why not just get rid of homicide laws because a tornado swept through parts of Oklahoma and killed some people? (That's about as nonsensical as your statement is) A zygote failing to implant isn't the same thing as the abortions we are talking about here. While it's true 15 percent of pregnancies end in spontaneous abortions, over half of those happen when it's an embryo before 3 weeks gestation, and by 11 weeks there's less than a 2% chance of miscarriage, less than 1% after 14 weeks. Which is a good thing because a woman's going to be a lot less devastated if the miscarriage was at 3 weeks than 14 weeks.
So? Neither is name calling..... BTW, a woman getting pregnant isn't "giving life"...she either gets pregnant or not, there is no "giving life"....
Turning the homeless into Soylent Green would also save a lot of money. That doesn't mean we should do it.
How would you feel about paying billions of dollars per year raising unwanted children born out of wedlock? who gets to pick up the tab for all their expenses?? are you willing to pay a lot more in taxes each year??
Any argument on the Euthanasia Apology Tour is nonsense, ipso facto. I will tell you it is nonsense, I won't debate nonsense with you.
Maybe this is why the Northeast is the most pro-abortion region of the country and the South is the most pro-life. Because the South has more hospitality.