Abortionists killing babes after birth? Infanticide okay?

More videos from someone making money off of being a “former abortionist”

I don’t watch videos I deal with FACTS

 

There is no such thing as an abortion enthusiast. Unwanted infants may be surrendered at any ER, police station or fire station.

 

It's a relatively new term used to describe those who are supportive of abortion and abortion practices without compromise. In a sense, a pro-abortion zealot. Lets break down the term by definition:
Abortionist: a person who carries out abortions (typically applied to someone not working in a hospital, or used to convey disapproval of abortion).
Enthusiast: a person who is highly interested in a particular activity or subject.

 

So you would be an "abortion enthusiast" according to your definition...…

And you are confusing Pro-Choicers with abortion advocates.

Pro-Choice doesn't mean advocating for abortion, it means advocating for CHOICE (DUH, that's why it's called Pro-CHOICE) and women's right to their own bodies...

 

Lets play a little game....

Pregnancy is a __________ of sex, whether you like it or not. And then you _______ the child for the mothers indiscretion. That's absolutely brilliant logic right there.

 

FoxHastings said: ↑
So what? Consent to one act (intercourse) is NOT consent to any other act.
No, you are wrong....and I'm sure you won't contact a lawyer to find the truth but the truth is...consent to one act is not consent to any other act.
If you consent to let a person enter your home have you consented to let him beat you up and rob you?? That could be the CONSEQUENCES of consenting to let them into your home.....

I guess when you can't address or refute a post then games are all you have

 

Pro choicers almost without question support and advocate for abortion. It's the alter ego of the PRO LIFE community, after all.

Sure you could technically call me that. However, Just like you wouldn't call someone who wants to ban guns a "gun enthusiast". Its nonspecific and therefore invalid. You would call that type of person a traitor.
No, I'm highly interested in the subject of eliminating abortion. Highly interested in relegating the entire subject to the record books. In fact, most of what I read about abortion disgusts me.
So a more effective approach to define my specific function relative to abortion would be:

ANTI-ABORTION
ENTHUSIEST

 

Bolding above mine.

So you would be an "abortion enthusiast" according to your definition...…

 

\
Im trying to get you to see the error of your ways.

You are denying culpability. This is pathetic and disgusting and serves no other purpose but to shift the blame away from the mother and hold her child accountable instead. This is called backwards thinking.

And pregnancy planned or unplanned is still a result of the mother's actions. And just like an unplanned pregnancy, you do not consent and it may still happen. Hold the baby accountable for the mothers actions, right?
That's because "consent" to getting pregnant after "consensual" sex is irrelevant. It's called an unintended consequence.

But most democrats prefer Death Oppression and the pursuit of sadness, isn't that right?​

 

See highlighted(bold) portion below

As I said above you are welcome to call me an "abortion Enthusiast" all you want

It's just not specific enough for my liking. just like you wouldn't call a gun control advocate a "gun enthusiast"

You see with Abortionist Enthusiast it gives you a much more clear cut idea that whoever is defined as such is one who fervently supports abortion protocol, policy and procedure to the point of being a zealot for the cause.

 

FoxHastings said: ↑
So what? Consent to one act (intercourse) is NOT consent to any other act.
No, you are wrong....and I'm sure you won't contact a lawyer to find the truth but the truth is...consent to one act is not consent to any other act.
If you consent to let a person enter your home have you consented to let him beat you up and rob you?? That could be the CONSEQUENCES of consenting to let them into your home.....

I guess when you can't address or refute a post then games are all you have

There are no errors in my ways...

.


I'd be mildly interested in you showing where I held any child accountable for anything...



​

 

Which according to YOUR definition you would be.


Potato-potahto…. you have no real POINT

Want to get back to the fact that Anti-Choicers want women to have less rights than anyone, including the unborn...

 

no it won’t!

 

I have a better game to play, it's called why don't you address posts? Like Post # 176

 

FoxHastings said: ↑
Oh DO please show the UNBIASED stats on how many women who have abortions are atheists...

Oh, ,look , something else you can't prove dig the hole deeper (especially with the insults advertising how desperate you are


BTW, I would guess that women who have abortions ARE supporters...

 

A "zef" ? Is that how you justify murdering it? Call it an acronym to remove it's humanity?

 

Really dumb post, projection to the extreme. I said most abortion SUPPORTERS....do you get that? I never said the women that get abortions. If you cant debate without putting YOUR words in MY mouth, we are done here. That's incredibly dishonest. No one "insulted" you...#victim

 

I think women who get abortions have to be supporters or they wouldn't get one....


and you STILL haven't proven that abortion supporters are mostly atheists ….

 

A human ZEF is human and NO one has said any different.

And ZEFs can't be "murdered"...

 

By default, virtually every abortion is holding the unborn child accountable for the mothers actions. Agree or disagree?

I am merely generalizing a specific component of the left wings rational behind abortion. Im not speaking to you singularly but for the rest of the liberal contingent as well. In a sense, I was speaking @ the left wing if any of them have ears left to hear with their heads buried deeply in the sand.

And by default, if you embrace abortion like its clear that you do (and most of the liberal left), YOU MUST shift accountability to the unborn baby in most instances of abortion. Mom has unprotected sex and the unborn baby has to pay for it. Again, brilliant logic here.

You said:
So what? Consent to one act (intercourse) is NOT consent to any other act.
Exactly what are you trying to say here? Whats the implication? i.e. where do you want to go with this?

 

Disagree, of course, the idea is ridiculous.

No, you didn't use logic at all....

Simple, consenting to sex is NOT consenting to anything else (like pregnancy)...as you alleged...

 

look at the ones in this very thread. Most women who get abortions are scared and young and naive, a great many, likely regret it later. They do it quietly and get on with life. ...Yeah, i see all kinds of churches, advocating murdering the unborn...

 

Why do you keep answering for Renee? It most certainly is murder, you just admitted it was a human, before it was murdered in the womb. Monsters.

 

Im sure well over 90% of mothers who get abortions are godless.

Just a handy reference guide...
atheists > liberal democrat > social democrat > progressist >socialist > fascist​

And don't forget, PP encourages sex... hmmm I wonder why?

For 500 can anyone solve the puzzle

can you say monthly ______ quotas?​

 

So who is paying for moms little misstep?

So whos to blame for the pregnancy? God? LOL

Liberal buzzword of the day: culpability

This is what an aborted baby looks like - only its gone through the meat mixer (baby gets shredded into pieces). Absolutely sickening that people would come out in support of this vile and immoral practice of murdering infants and the unborn.