All the hype on Judge Moore, but not a peep about Muhammed

There's not prepubescent here. They were full blown pubescent.

 

Not really. Mary's age is unknown. The Muslim is known.

 

LOL. Now a falsehood from you.
You just said, you THINK her age was 7. How is it known, if you have to think it was 7.
You are not very good at this debate stuff.

 

Statues honoring sworn enemies of the United States are being removed from public land in the United States now.

A predator of teenage girls is running for the Alabama Senate now.

We can bemoan Warren G Harding having a mistress, but it just does not seem timely.

 

Of which many of them are considered to be heroes and always will be. BTW what makes you think that your side is going to win round 2?

 

The Koran. Mary's age is unknown. Is that easy enough for you?

 

I would not vote for Muhammed to be a US senator or for that matter Moses a mass murderer of children.

 

"My side" is for folks showing one another mutual respect, and I am not acquainted with your "rounds."

I can't speak for any other side if there are any.

 

Typical response from a Islamophile.

 

Then quote the koran passage(s) giving the age. Why did you have to say you think, it was 7?
And Mary's age is widely believed. As is, Aisha.
But you keep showing your hypocrisy by pretending 1 religion had a young girl and 1 did not.
And you want to bash Islam and give Moore a pass.

 

So then Moses set the tone for Christians with his orders to killed women and children except for young girls that had yet to know a man?

As an atheist I would not vote for either of them for the US senate given a time machine.

 

Why do I not believe that, especially with the liberal history of free speech expression.

 

Are you disputing the Muslim's age vs Mary? Please spare me the nonsense.

 

It may be because you suffer from a hyper-partisan perspective, but social mores are established by society regardless.

 

I am calling you out, that you don't seem to know what you're talking about.
Post the age of Aisha from the Koran. You said 7 and it's in the Koran. Back it up or admit you're making stuff up.

 

And you don't? Liberalism is not compatible with societal survival. That is going to decide the issue.

 

I don't read the Koran or much of the Bible. However, as I"ve read it, Koranic scholars have fixed the age of the Muslim at around 7. Have I made it easy enough for you. The bottom line is Aisha was a child. Mary was not and at least twice as old. It's not even disputable, yet you persist.

 

I'm a conservative pragmatist who believes in being guided by what is shown to work best without the ideological dogma. I eschew both the rightist and leftist propaganda outlets.

 

I'd rethink that self assessment.

 

Aisha would be fiercely defending Mohammed and viciously attacking all his accusers if he were on the ballot in Alabama.

 

And you know this just how?

 

Thinking is good. Rethinking is often better. I recommend both.

 

Much the same way christians scholars fix the age of Mary the virgin, at 12-14.
So give us the scholars of Islam that put the age at 7. I don't think you can even do that. Still making stuff up.

So, at least now you admit this is made up. But you still show hypocrisy be believe 1 group of scholars over another group of scholars and are willing to give Moore a pass because 2000 yr old religions had teen girls in the stories.

 

Wrong. The age of Mary is not known. Only the legal age of marriage at that time is known.

 

I'm always open to new information, if you have reliable sources, and are willing to share.