Anti-White Racism Has Reached Critical Mass In America

I see you have given up

you can no longer justify your instance that white men rape black women, cant bring up any statistics to back up your ideology and just state your own unfounded beleif that inter racial rape is not a hate crime because it supports your agenda to pretend that racism is a one way street.

 

I joined this site only a few months ago. I was immediately shocked by the amount of racism against black people. Some people make threads that portray black people negatively every single day. They have avatars that defame blacks or promote white supremacy. They dance around the site's rules, stereotypes and hate speech regularly. I almost left because I was so sickened by this seedy, disgusting and shameful differentiation.

And now I'm reading that it's the blacks, not the whites, who are the aggressive racists.

 

It's just lack of understanding of sociology and short memories...and geography...and MTV.

Did you know that the UK has more language accents than the US? But they have a much smaller land mass. How can that be?

 

because....its true.

lack of understanding...of course it is. You know best of course. you don;t need statistics and peer reviewed reseacrh you just need opinion...right?

less mixing...next question

 

In investigating hate crimes and rape I was only able to come up with one example where the police were considering filing a "hate crime" indictment related to a rape case.

http://www.cnn.com/2007/US/09/11/woman.tortured/index.html

All six were later convicted with only one being found guilty of committing a hate crime. It should be noted that Megan Williams was determined to be an unreliable witness and the convictions were obtained using the defendant's statements and physical evidence. Williams, in 2009, recanted her story but because she had already been found to be less than truthful, and the fact that the cases were not prosecuted based upon her testimony, her recanting has been dismissed by prosecutors.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Megan_Williams_case

I haven't found any cases of a white rape victim and a black rapist where hate crime charges have ever been filed.

RAPE ITSELF IS NOT CLASSIFIED AS A HATE CRIME. End of story.

 

So something has to be classified as hate crime to be one? So there were no hate crimes BEFORE the term'' hate crime" was invented?

interesting that the hate crime charge came about because racial slurs were uttered. I take it that you believe any rape where the rapist used racial slurs is a rape crime.

 

FACT:
In the United States in 2005, 37,460 white females were sexually assaulted or raped by a black man, while ten black females were sexually assaulted or raped by a white man.

explain that!

- - - Updated - - -

Like Ahab's search for the Great White Whale, liberals' search for the Great White Defendant is relentless and never-ending. When, in 1988, Tawana Brawley's and Al Sharpton's then year-old spectacular charge that several white men including prosecutor Steven Pagones (whose name Brawley had picked out of a newspaper article) had abducted and raped the 15 year old was shown to be completely false, the Nation said it didn't matter, since the charges expressed the essential nature of white men's treatment of black women in this country. When the Duke University lacrosse players were accused of raping a black stripper last year, liberals everywhere treated the accusation as fact, because, just as with the Nation and Tawana Brawley, the rape charge seemed to the minds of liberals to reflect the true nature of oppressive racial and sexual relations in America.

To see the real truth of the matter, let us take a look at the Department of Justice document Criminal Victimization in the United States, 2005. (Go to the linked document, and under "Victims and Offenders" download the pdf file for 2005.)

In Table 42, entitled "Personal crimes of violence, 2005, percent distribution of single-offender victimizations, based on race of victims, by type of crime and perceived race of offender," we learn that there were 111,590 white victims and 36,620 black victims of rape or sexual assault in 2005. (The number of rapes is not distinguished from those of sexual assaults; it is maddening that sexual assault, an ill-defined category that covers various types of criminal acts ranging from penetration to inappropriate touching, is conflated with the more specific crime of rape.) In the 111,590 cases in which the victim of rape or sexual assault was white, 44.5 percent of the offenders were white, and 33.6 percent of the offenders were black. In the 36,620 cases in which the victim of rape or sexual assault was black, 100 percent of the offenders were black, and 0.0 percent of the offenders were white. The table explains that 0.0 percent means that there were under 10 incidents nationally.

The table does not gives statistics for Hispanic victims and offenders. But the bottom line on interracial white/black and black/white rape is clear:

In the United States in 2005, 37,460 white females were sexually assaulted or raped by a black man, while between zero and ten black females were sexually assaulted or raped by a white man.

What this means is that every day in the United States, over one hundred white women are raped or sexually assaulted by a black man.

The Department of Justice statistics refer, of course, to verified reports. According to the Wikipedia article on rape, as many as half of all rape charges nationally are determined by police and prosecutors to be false:

Linda Fairstein, former head of the New York County District Attorney's Sex Crimes Unit, noted, "There are about 4,000 reports of rape each year in Manhattan. Of these, about half simply did not happen.... It's my job to bring justice to the man who has been falsely accused by a woman who has a grudge against him, just as it's my job to prosecute the real thing."

No wonder there was such absolute belief in the guilt of the Duke students among the leading sectors of liberal America. A drug-addled, half-deranged, promiscuous black stripper accused three young white men of raping her. There are virtually zero rapes of black women by white men in the United States, and half of all rape charges against specific individuals turn out to be false. But in the gnostic, inverted world of liberal demonology, the white students had to be guilty.

Meanwhile, in the real America, week after week, the newspapers report the rapes of white women by black men—though, of course, without ever once using the words, "a white woman was raped by black man." Just last week in the New York Post there was a story about a serial black rapist who invaded women's apartments on Manhattan's Upper West Side; you knew the rapist was black from a police drawing accompanying the story, and you knew the victims were most likely white from the neighborhoods where the attacks occurred. But even when news media's reports of black on white rape make the race of the perpetrator evident (which the media only does in a minority of instances), no explicit reference is ever made to the racial aspect of the case. Each story of black on white rape is reported in isolation, not presented as part of a larger pattern. There is never the slightest mention of the fact that white women in this country are being targeted by black rapists. In the inverted world of liberalism, the phenomenon does not exist.
Like Ahab's search for the Great White Whale, liberals' search for the Great White Defendant is relentless and never-ending. When, in 1988, Tawana Brawley's and Al Sharpton's then year-old spectacular charge that several white men including prosecutor Steven Pagones (whose name Brawley had picked out of a newspaper article) had abducted and raped the 15 year old was shown to be completely false, the Nation said it didn't matter, since the charges expressed the essential nature of white men's treatment of black women in this country. When the Duke University lacrosse players were accused of raping a black stripper last year, liberals everywhere treated the accusation as fact, because, just as with the Nation and Tawana Brawley, the rape charge seemed to the minds of liberals to reflect the true nature of oppressive racial and sexual relations in America.

To see the real truth of the matter, let us take a look at the Department of Justice document Criminal Victimization in the United States, 2005. (Go to the linked document, and under "Victims and Offenders" download the pdf file for 2005.)

In Table 42, entitled "Personal crimes of violence, 2005, percent distribution of single-offender victimizations, based on race of victims, by type of crime and perceived race of offender," we learn that there were 111,590 white victims and 36,620 black victims of rape or sexual assault in 2005. (The number of rapes is not distinguished from those of sexual assaults; it is maddening that sexual assault, an ill-defined category that covers various types of criminal acts ranging from penetration to inappropriate touching, is conflated with the more specific crime of rape.) In the 111,590 cases in which the victim of rape or sexual assault was white, 44.5 percent of the offenders were white, and 33.6 percent of the offenders were black. In the 36,620 cases in which the victim of rape or sexual assault was black, 100 percent of the offenders were black, and 0.0 percent of the offenders were white. The table explains that 0.0 percent means that there were under 10 incidents nationally.

The table does not gives statistics for Hispanic victims and offenders. But the bottom line on interracial white/black and black/white rape is clear:

In the United States in 2005, 37,460 white females were sexually assaulted or raped by a black man, while between zero and ten black females were sexually assaulted or raped by a white man.

What this means is that every day in the United States, over one hundred white women are raped or sexually assaulted by a black man.

The Department of Justice statistics refer, of course, to verified reports. According to the Wikipedia article on rape, as many as half of all rape charges nationally are determined by police and prosecutors to be false:

Linda Fairstein, former head of the New York County District Attorney's Sex Crimes Unit, noted, "There are about 4,000 reports of rape each year in Manhattan. Of these, about half simply did not happen.... It's my job to bring justice to the man who has been falsely accused by a woman who has a grudge against him, just as it's my job to prosecute the real thing."

No wonder there was such absolute belief in the guilt of the Duke students among the leading sectors of liberal America. A drug-addled, half-deranged, promiscuous black stripper accused three young white men of raping her. There are virtually zero rapes of black women by white men in the United States, and half of all rape charges against specific individuals turn out to be false. But in the gnostic, inverted world of liberal demonology, the white students had to be guilty.

Meanwhile, in the real America, week after week, the newspapers report the rapes of white women by black men—though, of course, without ever once using the words, "a white woman was raped by black man." Just last week in the New York Post there was a story about a serial black rapist who invaded women's apartments on Manhattan's Upper West Side; you knew the rapist was black from a police drawing accompanying the story, and you knew the victims were most likely white from the neighborhoods where the attacks occurred. But even when news media's reports of black on white rape make the race of the perpetrator evident (which the media only does in a minority of instances), no explicit reference is ever made to the racial aspect of the case. Each story of black on white rape is reported in isolation, not presented as part of a larger pattern. There is never the slightest mention of the fact that white women in this country are being targeted by black rapists. In the inverted world of liberalism, the phenomenon does not exist.

 

why does the source matter?

Its whats true that matters.

Which facts do you dispute?

 

Gotta get used to these lefties, Sab. Most every post I start here is loaded with undeniable facts, yet that doesn't stop these lefties from attacking the source...especially if that source is a Sean Hannity or a Rush Limbaugh etc. You see, when they attack the source or use the word racist when responding to one of our posts--then it becomes quite clear that they haven't matured enough to join in with the debate. That one statistic you gave of some 34 K white women getting attacked or raped by a black man vs 10 black women getting attacked or raped by a white man kind of tells us that these lefties or white guilt black suck ups cannot and will not accept the truth. Their entire political philosophy is based on lies to begin with.

 

Their philosophy really is based on lying. They beleive in this thing called 'post modernism' where they use terms like ' we all have our own truths' meaning that using evidence and rationality is just one such 'truth' and that their 'truth' which is entirely ideologically based is 'just as valid'. SO even though they lie they don;t think lying is wrong so long as it 'serves a greater truth'.

 

Is there any "white" site like maafa.org ?
I want to see photos of white people tortured , set on fire , gutted and hanging from trees .
please ?

 

Learn to live in the 21st century like the rest of us. The topic of this thread is anti white racism, now don't go and try to divert attention away from that.

 

mutmekep's question was pertinent to this thread as it shows that not too long ago the civil liberties of Blacks were broken everyday by White lynch mobs. Our rights were not protected by the state and we were terrorized at will.Today things are changing and your loss of privileges based solely on skin color is that nagging feeling that causes you to believe in the myth of "reverse racism".

 

Actually its the massive scale of black crime, especially violent crime on white people that really annoys us.

 

What specific responsibilities does the African American underclass have to deal with its social pathologies?

- - - Updated - - -

Can an East Asian or South Asian benefit from White Privilege?

Does white privilege still exist in California or South Africa?

 

Follow my stream of thought-
1. African-Americans just like all ethnic groups in society have to correct their bad behaviors. I don't condone crimes committed by Blacks because they are Black. Right is right and wrong is wrong. But if you are harangued by society at birth, labeled public enemy #1 and corralled into the prison industrial complex at an early age for doing something your White counterpart got a slap on the wrist for that's problematic. Employers don't want to hire you because you're branded a felon, hounded by authority because you're an absent teen father behind on his child support. How can one earn a living??? Your life is an endless cycle of going in and out of jail but the prison industrial complex loves you. We have to promote higher education, demote the gangsta lifestyle promoted in Hollywood and reject the acceptance of stereotypes.

2.In a society that assigns privileges thru racial stratification Blacks will ALWAYS remain at the bottom. Meaning if said society is governed by White Supremacy/Racism, Whites are the pinnacle and Blacks are the lowest. East Asians are 2nd on the totem pole, for years they've been called the "model minority". So to answer your question yes Asians can benefit from White privilege as they are "closer" to them on said totem pole. Though since they are "under" them they can also be discriminated or subjected to racism.Remember the internment camps of WWII???

3.I assert that no matter if Whites find themselves in minority status by numbers, they still control the 9 Areas of People Activity1)Economics, (2)Education, (3)Entertainment, (4)Labor, (5)Law, (6)Politics, (7)Religion, (Sex and (9)War.
You see neither Asians or Hispanics are taking over Hollywood. Hispanics can't unilaterally enable their friends and families an instant egress from Latin America into our nation. Because the people who oppose those things are White.
So White privilege still exists in California. History shows that victims of White Supremacy/Racism are not immune to upholding the racist views of their oppressors. This phenomena led to the paper bag tests and hair comb tests in the African-American community. Perhaps you've heard of the light-skin vs dark-skin or "good hair" vs "bad hair" debates???These symptoms of Racism still persist today. Therefore, I must conclude that some form of White privilege still exists in South Africa. Even if it's only present in social interactions. Are you aware that Chinese South Africans were reclassified as "black" in a landmark South African ruling, allowing them access to economic benefits???

 

The question isn't whether they benefit from it but whether they are disadvantaged because of it.

Absolutely. In California, as well as the rest of the United States, because of racial prejudice in employment a white person with job knowedges and skills equal to or less than a black person will still be hired for a postion in a head-to-head competition and will receive more compensation and be promoted more often based solely upon the difference in the color of their skin.

In S Africa the white South Africans obtained a disproportionate percentage of the "wealth" under aparthied and they continue to own a disproportionate about of the wealth today. They inherited their "white privilege" from the aparthied era and it did not go away with the ending of aparthied.

 

The fact remains that 56% of Americans have anti-black racial prejudice that is the foundation for racism. Within this 79% of Repubicans and 32% of Democrats express explicit anti-Black racial prejudice.

Whenever the majority of a nation expresses explicit anti-racial prejudice it established beyond any reasonable doubt that the this racial prejudice that is the foundation for racism is well past the "critical" point.

The only racism that is well beyond the critical level in the United States is anti-black racism based upon every single scientific study ever conducted in the United States.

 

The privileged people are the ones you aren't allowed to criticise, that applies throughout the world. In the US black politicians can utter whatever racist (*)(*)(*)(*) they like but whites can't do the same.

 

[video=youtube;6CmzT4OV-w0]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6CmzT4OV-w0[/video]

 

The racist (*)(*)(*)(*)ing whites are calling blacks racists in this thread so this is nothing but pure BS.

Let's address the facts,

We know that 56% of Americans have ant-black racial prejudice.

There are also some interesting facts realted to racial prejudice from the same study that I recently found that apparently someone figured out.

http://www.imediaethics.org/News/35...racial_attitudes_really_tells_us__part_1_.php

It is interesting that if 30% of whites have anti-white prejudice then that represents more than the entire precentage of blacks in America.

What is shocking overall is the statistic that 9 in 10 Americans harbor racial prejudice which goes way beyond specific prejudice against a certain race. What the hell is wrong with all of us? The problem is far beyond just anti-black or anti-white racial prejudice but instead just the shear amount of racial prejudice of all kinds. Isn't it time we get over this because "prejudice" of any kind violates the Ideals upon which America was founded.

Simply stated: Prejudice is Anti-American

 

FACT

Black people rape white people at massive rates. White people hardl;y rape black people at all. The rpess refuses to cover it.

That is because Blacks have special rights in the usa. They rob.assualt and murder white people all the time and then whine when they are sent to jail.

 

Usually you are pretty perceptive. However, for you to have made the preceding statement you must lack insight into what is happening with Asian Americans. Asian Americans are the new White.

Do you know what Coastal Privilege is?

Whites in South Africa are going to disappear. They don't have a future. Most of them can't even immigrate to other western countries.

 

Imo from casual observation African Americans fall into about four or five discrete socio-economic groups. My focus is on the half of the African American population who compose the Underclass.

The real historical problem for the AA Underclass is that once a people become decadent they never recover.