Think about it. In this post industrial age, men don't have to hunt for food, or defend their tribe in combat, or fill many of the masculine roles that their ancestors have for 1,000s of years. Combined with the lax of exercise and unhealthy diets of modern Americans, and generations of men growing up without fathers or strong male role models, the end result is a bunch of "Marvin Milquetoasts" who have little in common with their manly heritage other than the same genitalia. Anyone can be a "male" but being a man is something earned, not bestowed at birth. As a result of men not acting like men, they have enabled the (*)(*)(*)(*)(*)y attitudes of feminists and entitlement complex of some women. Things which they despite, yet simultaneously enable. I mean when you have losers who resort to "buying stuff" or "doing favors" for women just hoping for a score, or trying to act "nice" in a patronizing and insincere way just to make women like them, it shouldn't come as a surprise to said scrubs when they run into golddiggers who just want to use them as a free paycheck for her and her illegitimate kids (while she bangs the neighborhood pot dealer on the side). When you have husbands who act like Sitcom archetypes straight out of "Everybody Loves Raymond" and "Friends", and adult men acting like needy 13 year old boys then is it any surprise that they'll likely end up with a shrewish henpecker, assuming they don't die a virgin first? I mean, can you imagine any manly man like James Bond, or Chris Kyle, or Ghengkis Khan "doing favors" or "buying stuff" for a woman to get laid? Lmao, hell no. If she's not into him it's no skin off his bones - there's a million others better out there anyway. And he has a little thing called self-respect and won't sell his dignity just to "get laid"- because he's not such a scrub that he has to "get laid" or "have a girlfriend" just to feel like he's a man anyway - he knows he is because he lives it everyday. (This is another negative by-product of modern industrialization - with many men disfranchised from their natural roles, "getting laid" becomes the low-hanging fruit and men are willing to brown nose women and tolerate disrespect just hoping to get some cheap, unsatisfying sex - not even caring that when she sobers up in the morning she'll gossip to her friends about how bad he was in bed - because putting his pee pee in the va jay jay is the only sense of identity he has - god forbid he realize that the test of a true Casanova is a giver not a getter - he doesn't "get laid" - he gives unforgettable orgasms). --- Fact of the matter is someone has to fill the masculine role when a man isn't there to do so - and when a male isn't doing it, a female will. Personal experience is that for every (*)(*)(*)(*)(*)y woman there's a sissy man enabling her. So as much as I dislike radical feminism and entitled, narcissistic women - I don't have a whole lot of sympathy for men who voluntarily put up with it and make it happen. Much as women who constantly "take a man back" even if he's cheating or abusive because they just "love him so much" aren't total victims and deserve the blame there as well.
The greatest feminists of the 20th century were Bill Clinton and Ike Turner. Those guys knew how to treat women in a very special way.
Uncle Ferd seems to think so... ... he says it's `cause o' all dem... ... lefty lib'ral so-called 'sensitive' wimpy-dos... ... dat womens has lost all respect fer men. P.S. (He says don't tell Granny he said dat... ... `cause she'd get mad.)
Are sissy women to blame for whatever the male version of feminism is called? Because I have to say, the counter-movements I've seen against extremist feminism aren't any better at all.
The OP is a whole bag of things, I'm not sure which to comment on. The technological revolution of the past hundred years or so has changed the employment landscape. Brains are more effective tools than brawn, and intelligent females are as plentiful as intelligent males. That, coupled with industries need for a bigger consumer base (a two income family is a two individual consumer family), has changed sex roles radically. I think many men have always alternately bullied and begged for womens attention. I think its worse for men who feel insecure and alienated around women in the first place. I guess my answer to the OP is-- Nah, women have always ignored weak and insecure men. I don't think they give those guys enough thought to be enabled by them.
I think they are simply angry, unhappy and seem to be against anything that might make a man happy. Why Do Feminists Hate Sex Robots? "In the zero-sum-game worldview of feminism, anything that makes men happy is bad. Kathleen Richardson, a professor at De Montfort University in England, is afraid that having sex with robots will make men happy...." http://theothermccain.com/2015/09/16/why-do-feminists-hate-sex-robots/
I completely agree, groups like the "MGTOW" community from what I've seen are just as awful. Instead of a bunch of overweight women whining about how oppressed they are by men, you have the same thing but with the sexes swapped. Some of them even use the same tactics as radical feminists such as "shaming" men who (gasp) actually date women and try to be attractive as though this means they're making themselves "submissive" to female control - it's sad to watch
Well me I'm against it because I think that we live in a post-industrial society of overconsumption, and that over-indulging in artificial stimuli is bad since people were biologically designed to be physically and socially active, and depriving humans of what they evolved to do and be results in unhappiness and mental illnesses. Much like wild animals which are raised in tiny concrete zoo cages tend to be physically and mentally less healthy than they would be if they were living in their natural environment. Spending 8 hours a day playing Wii Sports isn't a substitute for actually learning to play baseball, tennis, etc. And sticking your dick in R2D2 isn't a substitute for actually dating and having relationships with women. It's to sex what junk food is to a healthy diet.
I don't think it is 'sissy men's' fault. A 'sissy man' is subjective term that really only has meaning when you are trying insult someone or an adjective for poor choices made by men in relation to women since that phrase has a stereotype. I don't know any sissy men but I also don't find much use for that type of classification. I think 'angry feminism' stems from individuals(male and/or female) who believe feminism extends beyond equality and those who promote such ideas that men have to pay back for the transgression of the societies of old. The last part is assumed because if one advocates for special treatment vs equal treatment than there has to be a reason and the only thing that can be theorized as to make a reason to think that one would choose special treatment is 'collective retribution'/'collective penance'.
I don't think so, I think feminazi's get away with their militant (*)(*)(*)(*) because people tolerate it.... Those that tolerate their whacky nonsense is to blame, and progressives are the ones that not only tolerate it but back it... Honestly I think these feminist nuts are children who enjoy the gang mentality of feminism - that and they just like to be mean and cruel to men - because they can get away with it.. So I will treat those morons the same way they treat men.
That was the whole point - some men just tolerate it and then enable it. As an example check out the video on Youtube where the Atlanta security guard is forced to taze the angry black ho - her simp boyfriend just sat their and let her make a fool out of him and only got angry once the guard did his job and defended himself from the assault. I've seen a few situations like that in real life too - one time some drunk white slut was throwing a fit outside of a club because she couldn't get in without an ID and threatened the lady at the door that she'd get her fired - she had two simp male companions with her who just sat and went along with it. So I went up and asked them politely to "get that loudmouthed c-nt out of here", and the two simps and their whore just sulked away into the night, lol Guys like that who are afraid to stand up to unladylike women and put them in their place, either because of mommy issues or because they fear they wont' be getting poon tonight don't get my sympathy.
I've seen a few situations like that in real life too - one time some drunk white slut was throwing a fit outside of a club because she couldn't get in without an ID and threatened the lady at the door that she'd get her fired - she had two simp male companions with her who just sat and went along with it. So I went up and asked them politely to "get that loudmouthed c-nt out of here", and the two simps and their whore just sulked away into the night, lol
This is the result of progressives stealing males balls before they ever have the chance to grow into real men... This all starts at the grade school level.. The truth is in reality there is a war on men - not a war on woman.. Little boys cant even be little boys anymore at school - no they're treated like little girls and are programmed to believe girls are the future of society and they need to ride their coattails and like it because that is their job..
Nope. women love men. Feminism was launched and is perpetuated by (Askenazi) dryhumper bulls who deliberately are causing mistrusted and sadness between the two genders. That's all it is and all it ever was. It's not an accident, it's a militant war on men, to steal your women. You have been convinced that women are somehow no longer dependent on men. This is wrong. Women, really do still need men, for millions of reasons. the Bulldykes know that without men the human race would regress to the stoneage. So they don't want to do away with men, just separate them. It sounds heavy, but their goal is to make the world homosexual. horrifying no?
I think that part of the problem is in thinking that you be nice to women to get laid - long term that can play a role, but that whole mind process is essentially that of someone who uses a prostitute - so I give you a gift and you give me sex - that's not how it works. And I don't feel at all bad about buying gifts for women I care about - it's simply because I care about them and enjoy giving, which is as true with a romantic interest as it is with a sister - I like giving gifts. No I'm not about to break the bank for just anyone, but I'm not going to feel like I shouldn't give gifts to people I care about. And no, I don't think that "sissy men" is sufficient to explain the rise of feminism. I think an even bigger culprit is the falling standards of evidence: look around at how quickly people levy blame in the race cases like Zimmerman, Officer Wilson, or Obama inviting that whiny Professor to the White House (or that kid). Look at how quick people are to demand justice before they have the facts - then consider how quickly feminists rheotric, or "facts" are accepted without scrutiny. And then consider how quickly feminist "facts" fall apart under scrutiny - the problem is a lowering of standards of evidence, not sissy men. Taken together with an increased partisanship - people have their preconceived notions and they'll readily accept things which support those notions, but (in many cases) will furiously challenge (sometimes without any skill at all, by sheer willpower) anything that challenges their preconceived notions.
Nope I mean men with no backbone who don't know how to be respectable or demand respect in interactions with others, and constantly complain about the negative results they receive from women but never think to modify their behavior. There are plenty of non-violent geeky men who are of strong character and don't tolerate disrespect.
True on that - this is why said guys aren't really "nice" to begin with - giving gifts or favors just to get something out of it is actually quite Machiavellian - this is why I don't have a lot of sympathy for guys like this who levy all of the blame at "women". Truth is no one likes a sycophant, men or women. I'd blame this as part of a bigger trend of the dumbing down of America due to the tabloid media - the media knows it can sell manufactured outrage based on little to no actual facts, hence the PC trend - feminist faux-outrage is a subset of that.
This is very true. Most of today's men are dishonest, insecure cowards(characetristics you'd usually expect from women as they are more worried of reputation han men). They do not dare to speak their mind in fear of losing their reproductional rights. It is indeed nothing but fear of sexual rejection. After all, when all comes around, we are nothing but apes. We are simple minded animals.
