Atheist Group Seeks to Block Star of David on Holocaust Memorial

What evidence would you like to share to support your silly accusation?

 

Sounds as if you are agreeing with me, that a cracker barrel atty
(really the guy with the tree business) is as good as someone who has went ta no NYU or Columbia.

BTW, is that "men who carry weapons are weak" a statement of your own opinion?

 

There is evidence aplenty in the record of the conversation which has just terminated, you're welcome.

Sounds like you gotta hearing problem.

I would hardly attribute my own opinion to another poster.

BTW, are you drunk?

 

So you have no evidence, or you surely would have shared it.
This is humiliating for you.

 

Facts are a problem for ideologs.

And so, spotting me nearby, he makes a crude comment. What a guy.

 

I have no idea what you're talking about, though I wouldn't be surprised if you prefer it that way.

 

They should put that star on their Holocaust Museum because it represents the mentality of those who carried out the Holocaust that occurred against Sephardic "Jews" in Europe in the 20th Century around 1940's.

The star is called the star of Remphan in the Bible. It was representative of idolatry and rebellion to "nature's God."
And, certainly those who did the Holocaust, were idolaters and rebels to the God of Truth, Mercy and Faith.

Furthermore, the word Holocaust is a burnt offering of your own sheep, not your enemy. See the Duoay Bible 1607 Book of Leviticus, 1st chapter.

And as further support of this hypothesis, the Encylopedia Britanica 1952 says that "Jews" held high positions in the Nazi party:
Nazi Germany had a special court,
"Intended to enable prominent party members to rid themselves of the stigma of Jewish ancestry,"
Law of April 12, 1938 (Reichsgestzblatt I, 386)
Encyclopedia Britanica 1953, Page 219C Vol. 10

 

As I pointed out, only the Jewish were being wiped out as a form of ethnic cleansing. The others were not. You might want to note that the Nazis were targeting orthodox Jews. If someone had converted to Christianity, and was willing to identify other Jews, they were not targeted. Now, I do not have a problem with someone building a memorial to recognize the other groups that died, but on a memorial recognizing the Jews that were killed, there needs to be a Start of David. Plain and simple.

 

Then to further PEACE, please put the Hindu PEACE symbol, right on top of it!

 

Why? Were Hindu's killed in the ovens or gas chambers by the Nazi's? I thought that India was invaded by Japan during WWII. Not Germany.

 

India was invaded from Brits.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KXLDMn_LMNk

 

But the term NAZI is closer to the NASI, created by the orthodox.

ie... hitler thought he was messiah too

So at least we can witness by that account that 'jew' is not a people but an adherant.

Great work

A start?

The 'shield of David' is a war symbol. The hindu peace sign, has an extremely short usage with the nazi party, when it is far older than anything 'jewish'.

i would rather a peace symbol be observed than a war symbol.

ie..... bigots dont define the history that idiots believe....

Have you ever noted what the term NASI means and then relate it to NAZI?

How about that the original symobology of 'judaism' as the pentagram, versus the shield? It was christianity that took the pentagram (perfect golden ratio symbol), and made it into a bad metaphor.

 

Brit governed India during the same period that they governed palestine. It was the terrorist of palestine, the zionist, that was the example for terrorism of india, in which ghandi tried to keep the 'brothers' together as a unified india but since the zionist ended up with their own state, the muslims wanted pakistan (their own country).

That's history, not belief.

 

Good grieve. Sometimes I'm thinking antisemitism makes on a cellular level brain cells to drain cells. Do you like to tell me the Mahatama was a Jew? ... No - please forget it: I asked nothing. Don't say anything - except you like to shock me by telling me something what's lovely or reasonable.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yB-zWmu3l5c

 

Yes, India was ruled by Britton since 1757, but it was never invaded by Germany. It was invaded by Japan during WWII, but the Japanese Army Kohima. India did declare war on Germany, and Indian troops did fight against the Germans in Africa and Europe. But to return to the OP topic, I have not found any records of Indian troops Killed in the ovens or gas chambers of the Holocaust.

 

Stop thinking as it aint working for you!

Did he believe in judaism as a religious adherant.

ok

typical! In most posts, you dont.

Most people that learn what is real, are shocked by it.

Mankind are equally, human beings and to understand what life is, to the letter and how to live forever, is easy.

That's reasonable aint it?

As far as lovely: the religious wingnuts and lying sobs, will be extinct, eventually. Would that be lovely?

 

The "Star of David" - a star is a light in the darkness - is a symbol to be able to find the right way even in the night where the sun doesn't shine. Your antisemitism explains your confusion - but your antisemitism is not able to excuse your confusion.



Mahatma Ghandi said by the way one day something like "Be the change you like to see in the world"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=btHdFS98W7s

 

but in reality, no symbol can do that, right?

Meaning, you can hold a SOD and it will do nothing for you in the dark.

But, the old prophecy shares that when truth is understood, then there is no darkness, anymore. (in my own words of course). And that concept, i fully understand. Meaning, to comprehend how 'nature' works, is to understand 'light' itself. The majority of 'light' (em) we cant see, but that does not mean, it is not there. The postulate, i 'created' is that there is no perfect vacuum (completely empty) space, anywhere between points in time/mass). It cannot exist. That means, never is there 'darkness' (no light). It cannot exist.

I aint against a group of languages. The confusion is the idiot(s) dont know what they are saying and continue to lie to people because it is politically correct.

I guess you have a language issue across the board!

I am; inexcusably honest!

i dont play 'politically correct' and truth will destroy the ignorance, with causalties upon the liars.

 

India declared nothing because India was not existing. I would say England declared India to be in war with Germany.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3w4XFnUZm_Y

 

Aha

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UmPgLCezAGw

 

Let me say it in this way: It seems to me Hitler used the allied troops as ovens of the Holocaust in case of the Indian troops. See also: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indische_Legion

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xpZRpd--liE

 

You're funny.

All that written and the only thing that turns on a nob sit ar is a 'but'

 

Whatelse? I'm for example convinced that Jews are Germans in the german meaning of the german word for Germans. So from my german point of view the shoa is not a genocide but a fratricide. Funny, isn't it? I guess I'm the only German who thinks this.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U8VQz69Id7c