Bad Science Driving Bad Policy

That was my response.

 

WHAT assertion?

You make three word responses and then claim that is an assertion??

 

Not defined by me and I note you have not bothered to look up what it is

https://louisville.edu/ideastoactio...king has been described,& Smith, 1961; Ennis,

Possibly best depicted by the revised Blooms taxonomy

 

Strawman fallacy verging on a tou quoque fallacy

 

except the supply can be easily manipulated, thus the price

 

Why would I look it up? I know what it is.

 

That is not evident from your posts

 

https://institute-academic-development.ed.ac.uk/study-hub/learning-resources/critical

Academic level critical thinking demands one goes beyond just stating “I don fink so!”

 

Yours are just a steady diet of "appeals to authority" logical fallacies.

 

Oh, do tell.

This is rich.

 

Borderline insult

I on the other hand am attempting to educate you in a vital skill.

 

Not “getting” it yet? Because this is how you should evaluate evidence - any evidence/ data whether it is the warnings on a packet of Tylenol to a post on an anti science blog.

 

That in itself is a true borderline insult.

 

I do. That's why I don't buy any of yours.

 

It is, in fact, a supply and demand driven system.

 

Next time you do it on the board I will congratulate you

 

You are denying the undeniable and arguing against claims not made. This is behavior of a cornered propagandist.

 

Please see #53.

 

Proceed as you wish.

 

I'm afraid that's a claim reflecting a lack of knowledge. Numerous WUWT posts are based on, and linked to, peer-reviewed research papers.

 

This is another comment that reflects a near-complete lack of familiarity with WUWT.

 

only the supply is artificially controlled

 

Nope. Supply moves with demand.

 

Because WUWT does not use academic level writing - if it did the articles would be publishable in journals

 

Hmmm but are cherry picking those peer reviewed papers to a fare thee well