Bank Investigator Raised Concerns About Money from China that Ultimately Funded $40,000 Payment to..

Actually NO!
yardmeat's comment Admit NOTHING of the sort...
Are you sure you have been reading the correct thread?

 

Of course I do, influence peddling as has been shown.

 

Why would you think that an Ivy league PhD focusing on law would not be qualified to consult on anything?

 

Then why can't you show it?

 

Huh?
WHERE? Exactly...

 

There is nothing to rebut. "Rebuttal" would mean that there was something provided for rebuttal. You've failed there. All you are doing now is pretending that it is illegal for anyone you don't like to get a bank deposit.

 

Of course you don’t.
If you have “shown” influence peddling, you will be able to answer these questions
- what influence was peddled, exactly? What did Joe Biden DO?
- WHEN did he do it?
- WHO was the recipient?
- HOW MUCH did Joe receive?

 

Sure I presume they are innocent until the evidence says otherwise. Were I in court on the jury I would start from there and let the evidence determine. And when one has an alibi THEY GIVE IT. When one has records that prove their innocence they DISCLOSE them. When they offer nothing then the weight of the evidence goes heavily against them. They have rebutted none of the evidence except with their baseless unproven assertions about family loans.

NO explanation as to why China and various other enemies of ours and corrupt people were paying them tens of millions of dollars. There is NOTHING preventing them from coming clean to the American people. This is not IN COURT, this is public opinion and now an impeachment.

 

What evidence are you referring to that needs to be rebutted? Again, absence of invoices would never be considered sufficient evidence of money laundering in of itself... and that's not even getting into evidence to support the notion of a quid pro quo from the subject's father.

And no actually, this is not an impeachment, it is an inquiry. You know what an inquiry is, right?

 

Ok, yesterday I posted that if Hunter was such a cracker jack investment consultant, then why was/still claim to be broke? The answer I I got from a lib was coke is a helluva drug. In other words, coke fried his brain to where he's no longer capable of making sound decisions in the business activity he claimed he made millions with.

If that's true, then it would also apply to his decisions on the law, and everyone around him knew he was an addict.

BTW, do you know what serious addicts do? They steal your money to feed their addiction. Who in their right mind would hand over money to a drug addict so he could invest it for them? You might give him money if he helped you out, but you wouldn't give him money if you ever expected to get it back.

 

BG, you're hanging tough on this issue, but let's face facts; if we had a video of the Biden's swimming in a bathtub full of $100 bills, the left would tell you to prove it wasn't fake Hollywood movie money.

Hey libs, can you explain the diamond Hunter received and what it was for?

 

Republicans didn’t have to ask for Biden’s. He released them willingly like the last dozen presidents did (except one)

Still waiting on what type of bribery the county of China bought with 0.00000000555% of their GDP. How far does 1 grand go?

 

So what? And he may have some of his own tax problems if he can't prove those hundreds of thousands he was getting weren't loan repayments.

Why do you claim the Chinese only gave the Biden's 1 grand? What was it Hunter was demanding payment for with The Big Guy sitting there next to him which was followed a few days later by a $5,000,000 transfer by the Chinese?

 

Yes absent of invoicing or billing is a sign of money laundering as I have cited the bank investigators and the IRS investigators, your utter denials and dismissals are empty and devoid of any basis. I just cited you the latest and you simply dismiss it because that is the best you got. And it is the impeachment inquiry the first official step on an impeachment.

 

Who was the transfer to?
What did Joe give them in return?

 

Burisma. An abundance of evidence has been made public.

 

If you want to say it's "a sign" that's an abstract term of phrase. Describing something as "evidence" however is not an abstract term. While the lack of invoices may raise suspicion that leads to investigations or audits, it would not be sufficient enough to be considered evidence of money laundering. Realistically speaking, nobody would be convicted, or even charged for money laundering based on a lack of invoices alone. And that's just getting into Hunter Biden's financial transactions, that's not even getting into the notion that links the transactions to a quid pro quo from Joe Biden.

Yes, it is an impeachment inquiry. So what does "inquiry" mean?

 

They prove reasonable doubt. If there is reasonable doubt, then the jury is instructed not to convict. Reasonable doubt does not mean innocent, just means not enough to prove the guilt of a person beyond a reasonable doubt

 

They prove reasonable doubt by providing evidence that proves a reasonable doubt. What reasonable doubt has the Biden family produced?

 

Now there are concerns from banks, let me repeat that, BANKS, that Biden may have engaged in human trafficking. When it rains it pours.

Banks filed at least 6 suspicious activity reports flagging Joe Biden's home address, senator says
Reports flagged $12 million in transactions tied to Hunter Biden via Joe Biden's Wilmington, Delaware home address and raised concerns about money laundering, human trafficking, Sen, Ron Johnson tells Just the News.


Banks filed at least six reports concerning Hunter Biden's foreign business dealings that flagged President Joe Biden's home address in Delaware and raised concerns about possible criminal activity involving money laundering or human trafficking, according to a U.S. Senator who investigated the first family's finances for years.

Sen. Ron Johnson of Wisconsin, the top Republican on the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, told the Just the News, No Noise television show Thursday night that the Suspicious Activity Reports (SARS) chronicled about $12 million in transactions over several years, some of which passed through Joe Biden's Wilmington, Del., home where he had allowed his son to stay.

https://justthenews.com/accountabil...ctivity-reports-linked-joe-bidens-address-ron