i'm watching the nat geo account of the bin laden story. the whole thing seems made up to me. too hollywood scripted.
Your whole life seem make up to you. You are in fact living in a bubble filled with only conspiracy material and innuendo without anything remotelly ressembling the real world. How's your padded cell? I didn't know you could get internet access in such a place.
that's not very nice/friendly for a sunday morning... i can have my opinion if i want to, america is a free country.
to answer your question: for the past couple of years i have been concerned for how ngc has become tainted, and biased much like public radio.
I just want to point out to anyone else your media standards: National Geographic- tainted, biased- not to be trusted. World News Daily?- you trust implicitly and regularly cite. I think this describes your view of the world perfectly.
media is in a big transformation. please link to where i said i trust wnd implicitly. can this be substantiated somehow ?
The same thing the other wants, that is for you and your birther friend to join us in the real world and stop waisting good bandwidth posting silly "opinion" and conspiracy theories...
so now the obots don't think there is enough bandwidth to entertain discussion about a conspiracy in the miscellaneous section of a political forum ? that seems extreme to me.
Because it happened. I know it is a great affront to you that the current president got the job done while your pal bushie didn't, but that is life. You should have more faith in your own special forces. What? Do you thing OBL was some kind of superman that couldn't be killed?
Nor did I claim you said you trust WMD implicitly. However your actions say that you do. Seriously, you question the integrity of ng but never WMD.
