Christianity and Homosexuality

There is manuscript and eyewitness evidence that Jesus existed. https://www.gotquestions.org/did-Jesus-exist.html

 

That's English.

 

Genesis 2:23

And Adam said, This is now bone of my bones, and flesh of my flesh: she shall be called Woman, because she was taken out of Man.

 

no it doesn't. we've been over that already

 

no there isn't.

 

Ancient Babylonian records mention a confusion of languages. https://www.gotquestions.org/Bible-reliable.html

 

Paul wrote manuscripts 40 years after Jesus died.

 

For those that ignore history, the same history will repeat itself. The statement I answered said it was religion that creates death and destruction. I simply reasoned out logically that it's quite the opposite. Those who believe in Darwinism believe human beings are no different than the animal or insect kingdoms. Therefore, there is no moral condemnation to murder, sin, homosexual behavior, genocide, cannibalism...That, it's quite natural to do these things because we are just animals with instinctive behaviors to do these vile horrible things. Where as God condemned murder, sin, homosexual behavior, genocide, cannibalism and all manner of wickedness and horror. Dahmer wrote about why he did what he did and until he found God while in prison. It was for the very same reasons Darwinists preach man evolved from animals and does not have to adhere to any moral creed that is against observed nature (Animals, insects...)

 

No, you choose not to recognize the versus provided for you as proof. You ignore the words and change the meanings or just claim they aren't inspired of God so that sinners can continue to keep on sinning. LGBTQ groups actually remove parts of the Bible that refer to their sins. Cancel Culture is ramped amongst the Liberals.

 

Yes, there must be customs to join man and woman as either couples while living on earth or into the eternities. Marriage is ordained by God. Again, the words need not be spelled out to appease you for this to be true. It's reasonably logical to believe that man and woman can be joined as one flesh as stated in Genesis. The word that describes this in English is "Marriage."

 

which has nothing to do with the fact there is no evidence outside of biblical accounts for jesus, nor is there archeological evidence for the bible.

 

Ancient Babylonian records that mention a confusion of languages are historical evidence of the Bible.

 

there is no evidence paul of the bible existed.

 

no it isn't

 

The Bible mentions events that were mentioned in ancient Babylonian records.

 

The apostle Paul was a real person. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_the_Apostle

 

which is not evidence of archeological or historical accuracy of the bible. Hundreds of other religious texts also mention historical events.

 

there is no evidence paul from the bible ever existed.

 

It's a historical fact that the apostle Paul was a real person.

 

it is an objective fact of reality that there is no evidence paul from the bible ever existed.

 

Pagan myths mentioning the flood show that the same flood event mentioned in the Bible happened and knowledge of it was passed to all people.

 

The apostle Paul is mentioned in secular history.

 

we know, scientifically, that at no point in the entire 4.5 billion year history of the earth was there ever a global flood. Obviously localized floods occur, and people tend to live around water sources, which...............flood.

 

no he isn't.

 

All of the cultures of the world, in mentioning the worldwide flood, are mentioning the same event that the Bible describes. https://www.gotquestions.org/Bible-reliable.html