Could Trump Murder Nancy Pelosi on National TV with Immunity?

I am not a big fan of cats myself so if it's possible that I had covid it could be possible that I might not try everything in my power not to sneeze in the direction of a cat.

So throw me in Leavenworth in the cell next to Trump.
.
Since we're doing hypotheticals there's not very many areas that I can't go

 

You misspelled history. The "crackpot conspiracy" is denying basic facts without any semblance of evidence to discredit the truth.

 

That's because at best, it's a half-truth, with links to terrorism and drone attacks. It's not even related to presidential immunity for alleged crimes. Belongs in another thread.

https://www.politifact.com/factchec...s-citizens-killed-obama-drone-strikes-3-were/

HALF TRUE – The statement is partially accurate but leaves out important details or takes things out of context.
Click here for more on the six PolitiFact ratings and how we select facts to check.

 

LOL @ PolitiFact. You have to love how they cherry pick a quote and then argue against that quote. They quote the fact that Obama killed four Americans in drone strikes and then say, "yeah, but he really only wanted to kill one of them, the others were just collateral damage! And besides he thought he was a bad person when he had him assassinated. No reason to bring evidence to a court of law and adjudicate it." Presidents extrajudicially assassinating Americans is perfectly okay to modern leftists as long as the person doing the killing has a D next to their name. They really know who their audience is and their absurd articles hit that target demographic perfectly. It's unfortunate people are so easily persuaded by their hilariously absurd gimmicks in an effort to fulfill their preconceived opinions.

Newsflash: Americans have a right to a trial. You can't just assassinate someone because you think they're affiliated with a group of people. That's not how due process works. This individual was not on a battlefield. He was not an imminent threat. That's not how our judicial system works. But congratulations for standing up for a Democrat President assassinating and having a kill list of Americans in a thread where you mocked whether or not Trump could assassinate an American. You're actually not opposed to Presidents assassinating their political enemies, you're just opposed to a weird fantasy of Trump doing it despite him being in office for four years and never actually doing it. If he had, I'm sure he'd be catching charges for it right now. It would be the strongest criminal case against him... certainly stronger than this nonsense about not labeling an NDA expense in the way a corrupt prosecutor would have preferred him to. And then making it a felony by saying it was done in the commission of another crime that wasn't identified.

 

Would be hard to get away with that even for him, but you know a percentage of his supporters would pretend it didn't happen just like they have with the stuff he's already done. But with video evidence of a murder, I doubt even MAGA would be able to save him.

 

If Trump murdered Pelosi live on television his fans would masturbate themselves into a stupor with the thrill of it all, and sales of tissue and toilet paper would go through the roof.

 

Yes, but when the Republicans claim to support small limited government they are just kidding.
DHS was created in 2002 under W.

DHS
Employees 240,000 (201[1]
Annual budget $51.672 billion (FY 2020)[2]

"Trump administration
On November 16, 2018, President Donald Trump signed the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Act of 2018 into law, which elevated the mission of the former DHS National Protection and Programs Directorate and established the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency.[13] In fiscal year 2018, DHS was allocated a net discretionary budget of $47.716 billion.[2]" Wiki
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Department_of_Homeland_Security

 

I've been voting third-party for quite some time now and have no intention to vote for Biden or Trump later this year. The Republican establishment are hypocrites.

 

Below is the crux of the matter. Putting this case on HOLD, in an election year is irresponsible. Recall how quickly they settled the Bush/Gore appeal in 1999. America watched the culmination of the nut-job "Stop the Steal" BS escalate into an insurrection at the capitol that resulted in 9 deaths, and the SCOTUS can't take up the matter immediately?

https://www.scotusblog.com/2024/02/supreme-court-takes-up-trump-immunity-appeal/

Stressing that it should not be regarded as any sign of the justices’ views on the merits of Trump’s claims, the justices instructed the D.C. Circuit to keep its ruling on hold until the Supreme Court issues its decision.

 

Tell us more about how you oppose due process for your political opponents. Which political ideologies are best known for these beliefs? You can say it. We already know the answer.

Intentionally waiting until the campaigns started to bring these charges was irresponsible. Working through all the layers of novel theories of law that comprise of this prosecution should have been expected and thought of in advance when these prosecutions were timed to interfere in the election.

The far left extremists need to relax. They're still getting the election interference that was planned to achieve. The headlines every day have been about these timed election interference cases. The problem is that thus far it has had the inverse effect. That is what Jack Smith and Biden's administration didn't account for. Now that we know hyper-partisan lawfare isn't working they want to get a conviction to see if that will help.

 

Typical nonsense, saying "Jack Smith and Biden". Another of your Conspiracy Theories?

 

Politicians: hypocrites.

"I think people involved in politics make good actors. Acting and politics both involve fooling people. People like being fooled by actors. When you get right down to it, they probably like being fooled by politicians even more. A skillful actor will make you think, but a skillful politician will make you never have to think." Donna Brazile

 

What are you talking about? What politicians? Trump ACTED like a fool when he degraded Paul Pelosi, the victim of a MAGA lunatic with a hammer. Maybe that's what you mean?

 

All these angry late election cycle smears only attract more voters to the Trump campaign.

“Most of Taibbi’s reasons for ignoring the right are familiar ones employed frequently by lifelong Republicans. He argues that Democrats “are being organized around a more potent but also much dumber, more cultlike ideology,” an idiosyncratic reading of a political landscape in which Donald Trump is the subject of conservative propaganda depicting him as literally Christlike.

Taibbi likewise maintains that Trump is the victim of “lawfare” and whatever authoritarian impulses he may harbor pale beside those of the Democrats: “The Democrats’ ambitions are significantly more dangerous than those of the Republicans. From digital surveillance to censorship to making Intel and enforcement agencies central players in domestic governance — all plans being executed globally as well as in our one country — they are thinking on a much bigger and more dangerous scale than Republicans.”
NEW YORK MAGAZINE, THE NATIONAL INTEREST, INTELLIGENCER, Left-Wingers for Trump Remain Deeply Confused Matt Taibbi thinks Republicans are powerless, By Jonathan Chait, who’s been a New York political columnist since 2011, April 2, 2024.
https://nymag.com/intelligencer/article/matt-taibbi-why-republican-trump-left-wing.html

Proving that Democrats and RINOs are even worse than all these "deplorable" Republicans is not smart politics.

 

Still lost, but if it makes sense to you, so be it.

 

"Lost" what?

 

Today? No. But I can envision a possible right wing authoritarian future in which such a thing would be allowed. I can also envision a possible future where it is the left rounding up dissenters.

 

Republicans are prone toward knee-jerk "back the blue" authoritarianism until a billy club knocks some sense into them at a school board meeting or pro-life demonstration.
Both parties have odd fantasies about "our cops".

“Recalculate
Motherf**er:” Republican Rep. Curses Out ...

The New Republic
https://newrepublic.com › post › video-shows-back-blu...
Aug 15, 2023 — New bodycam footage shows “Back the Blue” Representative Ronny Jackson berating police officers.
https://newrepublic.com/post/175004/video-shows-back-blue-republican-representative-cursing-police

 

I said Jack Smith and "Biden's administration." It's not a secret that Biden's administration was meeting with Jack Smith's team before the indictments. But I understand why you would lie and say I said something I didn't. The facts about this thread haven't worked out very well for you.

 

Please clue us in on this "Secret". Make sure that when I search the Media Bias of your source, that it doesn't say "Pseudo Conspiracy Theory" Here's the link for you to check the source.
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/

 

Could Joe Biden do just about any felony and be found to be an old man with a poor memory and therefore un-prosecutable?

 

Please be real and objective. Biden never did anything the likes of Trump BS.
1. Ridiculing Paul Pelosi, who had gotten hit over the head with a hammer by MAGA lunatic.
2. Watching violence, destruction, and killing on TV, for 3-1/2 hours, while doing nothing.
3. Making fun of a disabled man.

FAUX News has indoctrinated many of you. They stopped reporting the history of January 6th and many other events, so you can live in your dream world.

 

Again: "Could Joe Biden do just about any felony and be found to be an old man with a poor memory and therefore un-prosecutable?"
They have NOT stopped talking about 1/6. Recently, Vivek Ramaswamy brought up that it was an inside job. No duh.
Peaceful protesters, before there had been any kind of out of line activity, angry that Biden appears to have stolen the 2020 election, were shot with anti-protestor ammo, gassed and violently attacked by those supporting the deep state and wanted their false flag to, among other things, change the conversation regarding the appearance that Biden and his stole the 2020 election.
In various ways, the 1-3 you reference have been debunked or immaterial. For instance, that disabled man said Trump was lying about a subject HE HIMSELF had reported. It wasn't his disability Trump was mocking but what a despicable lying A$$ hat he is. I imagine you already knew that.

ITMT: Biden is a blood drenched fascist who is trying to imprison his primary opponent as, "we went to rape and sterilize your kids, replace you with immigrants while bankrupting the nation sending $ all over the planet" is not a good campaign slogan. Biden's AG is out there, we can infer, demanding massive voter fraud in 2024 because, they cannot win with such a campaign position.

 

Wow - simply beyond description. Anti-American rhetoric. Conspiracy theories. I suppose your favorite news channel is Steve Bannon's War Room. And your favorite news outlet probably Breitbart. Good luck in your continued struggle to be taken seriously, and your acclimation to society.

 

Oh noes!!! You might stick your tongue out at me next rather than answer the question: "Could Joe Biden do just about any felony and be found to be an old man with a poor memory and therefore un-prosecutable?"