Why? He's on his way out with his legacy soon to be dismantled and the Klintons committed to the dustbin of history. LOL
You must have thought that one up in your cry room. But hey, lets celebrate. Black Friday was the biggest day in the history of gun sales in the US. I'd scratch that deal with the cryo-suspension. Space travel might be a better bet. LOL.
Does it bother you that its called Black Friday? How about the fact that Ben Carson will be in the white house for cabinet meetings? Is there a back door he can use? LOL
Not really but the election results seem to bother you. Maybe you should think of an isolated monastery. December will be the biggest month in the history of gun sales EVER. LOL.
Nope, not at all. But hey, the White House has seen the last of spilt Klinton DNA. Hillary will never drop a pile in the WH toilets and Huma will never be a nightly guest. Sweet. LOL.
Ok then address the first part of my post. By your logic the courts were right in allowing slavery and banning homosexuality.
of course you do but you are wrong. The federal government doesn't have any proper power to ban or restrict firearms to citizens living and acting in their own sovereign states.
Then demonstrate precisely how it can be done under the current circumstances. No other country in the world has a justice system regarded as a revolving door. Nor has any other country in the world reached the saturation point where there are more privately owned firearms in circulation, than there are people to own them. The number of firearms currently in the united states is literally higher than the number of citizens living in the country. Show us one other country in the world that has faced a similar situation and successfully overcame it, and perhaps you will have a point. All of the above have precisely one common denominator. All four of the cited examples of overcoming what is claimed to be impossible, involves matters that are purely physical. Traveling to a new location, or moving at greater speeds, all involve overcoming physical barriers and limitations. However none of the four examples have required completely changing the way a society operates, or addressing long-held societal customs and beliefs that a majority of the population has cherished for generations. Climbing Mount Everest involves scaling a fixed, immutable distance. Mount Everest cannot grow in terms of size or magnitude. For all intents and purposes it is unchangeable. Firearms ownership, however, is always in flux, with the numbers of firearms owned growing at a constant pace, and the number of firearm owners increasing. What you are seeking to overcome is not a physical fixture, but rather a culture.
There is a significant number of black conservative party members that oppose Barack Obama, and the practices of the liberal democrat party in general. - - - Updated - - - Simply stating that you disagree is not an actual or valid counterargument.
Personally, I would like to see more gun deaths life the one in Ohio. The moment someone tries to harm an innocent person, they should be removed from the gene pool immediately. As far as the "Its better than doing nothing" argument, I have to strongly disagree that disarming good people is better than doing nothing. By that logic, disarming law enforcement would be better than doing nothing, right? What if a private citizen had the same background checks and training as law enforcement? Would you agree that they should be allowed to carry a firearm?
