Congratulations - you know how to post FAKE pictures. Really makes me trust in your integrity. To post the truth. You guys are so adolescent. Posting FAKE pics. Doesn't reality sit well with you guys, or something? Is that what it is? http://saynsumthn.wordpress.com/200...iew-margaret-sanger-and-false-kkk-klan-photo/ Bunch of juveniles pretending to be adults posting at a political forum. I love it. Such lunacy all in one place. What fun. FAKE PICS ARE DISINGENUOUS - BUT YOU GUYS KNOW THAT, RIGHT?
^^ FAKE picture followed by FAKE / DISINGENUOUS video. Video contains back to back distortions / misquotes: Blacks, soldiers, and Jews are a menace to the race. "This fabricated quotation, falsely attributed to Sanger, was concocted in the late 1980s. The alleged source is the April 1933 Birth Control Review (Sanger ceased editing the Review in 1929). That issue contains no article or letter by Sanger." As early as 1914 Margaret Sanger was promoting abortion, not for white middle-class women, but against 'inferior races' black people, poor people, Slavs, Latins, and Hebrews were 'human weeds.' "This allegation about Margaret Sanger appears in an anonymous flyer, "Facts About Planned Parenthood," that is circulated by anti-family planning activists. Margaret Sanger, who passionately believed in a woman's right to control her body, never "promoted" abortion because it was illegal and dangerous throughout her lifetime. She urged women to use contraceptives so that they would not be at risk for the dangers of illegal, backalley abortion. Sanger never described any ethnic community as an 'inferior race' or as 'human weeds.'" The most merciful thing that the large family does to one of its infant members is to kill it. "This statement is taken out of context from Margaret Sanger's Woman and the New Race (Sanger, 1920). Sanger was making an ironic comment not a prescriptive one about the horrifying rate of infant mortality among large families of early 20th-century urban America. The statement, as grim as the conditions that prompted Sanger to make it, accompanied this chart, illustrating the infant death rate in 1920: Deaths During First Year 1st born children 23% 7th born children 31% 2nd born children 20% 8th born children 33% 3rd born children 21% 9th born children 35% 4th born children 23% 10th born children 41% 5th born children 26% 11th born children 51% 6th born children 31% 12th born children 60%" We do not want word to get out that we want to exterminate the Negro population. "Sanger was aware of African-American concerns, passionately argued by Marcus Garvey in the 1920s, that birth control was a threat to the survival of the black race. This statement, which acknowledges those fears, is taken from a letter to Clarence J. Gamble, M.D., a champion of the birth control movement. In that letter, Sanger describes her strategy to allay such apprehensions. A larger portion of the letter makes Sanger's meaning clear: It seems to me from my experience . . . in North Carolina, Georgia, Tennessee, and Texas, that while the colored Negroes have great respect for white doctors, they can get closer to their own members and more or less lay their cards on the table. . . . They do not do this with the white people, and if we can train the Negro doctor at the clinic, he can go among them with enthusiasm and with knowledge, which, I believe, will have far-reaching results. . . . His work, in my opinion, should be entirely with the Negro profession and the nurses, hospital, social workers, as well as the County's white doctors. His success will depend upon his personality and his training by us. The minister's work is also important, and also he should be trained, perhaps by the Federation, as to our ideals and the goal that we hope to reach. We do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population, and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs (Sanger, 1939, December)." http://www.plannedparenthood.org/files/PPFA/OppositionClaimsAboutMargaretSanger.pdf
There is no evidence to support the rape allegation. There is evidence to support a theory that the whacky little bed-hopper lied to one of her friends to cover up the fact that her husband had smacked her in the mouth for boinking around. (She was married to a guy named Hickey at the time, and was doing Mr Brodderick on the side.) Wasn't that consensual? Jones' story doesn't check out. A corrupt prosecutor threw McDougal in jail because she would not lie for them to trap Clinton. Feminists were plenty pissed off at Starr over that crap. She went to Washington thinking that she was going to get some action. That's consensual. She should have known not to brag to that viscious little snake Tripp.
Actually, he lost his marbles. What that sorry pile of compost did was l;ess ethical than what we know any left-winger other than Edwards to have done to women.
Sanger was a product of her time and would probably be laughed at or scorned today. I, personally, would far rather be put in the same bag with Bella Abzug than with Lihater's hero Willam Pierce (may that one rot in the latrines of hell.)
That is not a rule, it is just a common-sense thing. You do not attack people working toward your goals unless they are also doing something hideously wrong, like John edwards. Well, DUH! Most of the prominent female conservatives are bat crap crazy.
From your own link: Fake picture or not, even your own source confirms that she not only spoke at a KKK event but even "got along quite well with members of the New Jersey branch of the Ku Klux Klan." I'm just laying the facts out there. Whether or not you choose to accept them is entirely up to you. In addition, here are some other things worth considering: [video=youtube;X-PlpCeCyN8]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X-PlpCeCyN8&list=FLgyn7gRH1-sYJiTBHeqwvRg&index=4&feature=plcp[/video]
Actually, it's called having an open mind and being willing to listen to another perspective. I know this is an alien concept to a lot of people, but there are actually some out there who are able to do this. Given your choice of words to call another human being a "sorry pile of compost," I'll go ahead and put you in the category of people who are stuck in a one-opinion world. And what are you even talking about anyway? What did Breitbart ever do to women? You sound like you're trying to connect two completely unrelated things here just because you have nothing else to argue with.
I've been gone all day and come back to the usual liberal skew and revise job, but then I see this guy in the video again making these libs look so foolish that I have to compliment you for posting it. And did you get a load of that Gwen still sticking up for that monster margaret sanger? My GOD, google that wench and every single link compares her with Satan and or Hitler. Liberalism is so far beyond the pale that it is almost useless arguing with these people. Common sense isn't one of their strong points, now is it? Liberals are so morally bankrupt that most of their social values consist of the killing of people be it eugenics, euthanasia, abortion, and their support of inner city black crime that more often than not leads to the death of someone.
No, only people who, like you, completely lie by quoting people out of context and manipulate the truth. I just proved all your points were a complete travesty. Please, get a life, liar. Well no, she didnt respond because she didnt have to - I proved you completely wrong. Sanger was a great lady. This video is once again unsubstantiated propaganda - not fact. The first comment, even says: "The video's a despicable lie. Sanger did not EVER say to "exterminate black people," she spent her life fighting AGAINST racism, she was in fact a civil rights hero, supported by WEB DuBois and Martin Luther King, both of whom also considered her a personal friend." Yep - those the mother seeks to go through with. No, its their decision - they can keep it or kill it, its their choice. Oh and its not God's children - its the mother's child. Explain how any of these are genocidal. LOL Which makes you a tyrant. Definitely you.
So? You realize she did not realize she was about to attend a KKK rally when she did. According to her autobiography, she was paid to conduct a lecture, but upon arriving realized what she had become entangled with an, out of complete fear, she could not even talk directly about abortion, let alone birth control. Plus, this photo is clearly not the same situation - its clearly photoshopped. Holy crap dude are you that stupid? Please, dont tell me you are a liar and manipulator of the truth as well? I'm quite sure you arent a racist or advocate or racial segregation as Libhater is?
Have to hand it to you Unifier, you are one deluded guy. Yes, she spoke at a KKK rally - without realizing she was about to do so. Upon her arriving she only spoke about a fraction of what she believed because she was fearful of her security, and quite rightly. Read the section of her autobiography yourself to see how you have no idea what you are talking about. No, its your opinionated interpretation and manipulation of the facts as they are known. This was just (*)(*)(*)(*)ed up funny bull(*)(*)(*)(*). It doesnt refute let alone challenge anything already said. ps. There is nothing wrong in discriminating against babies you wish to abort so long as it is the mother doing the discriminating. As for what liberals believe, I neither know nor care - it is beside the point.
He financed the adventures of a gang of criminals who destoryed the lives of people who were just trying to make democracy work. That buzzard-beaked fake journalist pimp O'Keefe isn't fit to shine the shoes of the people he slimed. Breitbart's "brain" was probably necrosing for lack of oxygen as his vile little heart deteriorated. The slime ball was of no value to society.
Amazing. Even by your low standards that sets a record. Actually makes little sense. Who are the people "who were just trying to make democracy work"? I can't think of anyone or any group on the left that could make that claim absent some seriously bad drugs. And, the "gang of criminals"? Are we talking about the SEIU? the Democrat Purple shirt thugs? Perhaps we're talking about the Congress that engages in insider trading? You know, Nancy Pelosi et al. Or, are you talking about ACORN and their voter fraud empire? Perhaps the Obama stimulus frauds? So many gangs of criminals and so little time? Or, how about President Obama and his illegal shuffling of assets to unions in the takeover of GM? Oh, my, so many to pick from. Of course, Andrew Breitbart didn't carry the weight in the world of a Michael Moore did he? Few humans do. Pigs do but few humans. I think setting up the feminists to destroy their credibility was the best accomplishment of the Clinton years. Sen. Packwood gets savaged for impure thoughts and for President Clinto who committed sexual assault, sexual harrassment, hiring James Carville to slander the women, and committing perjury...silence from the feminists. Excellent move by our Philandrerer in Chief and Chief Perjurer.
Yes they are, and that is why this post so clearly shows and proves that point of just how partisan these femanazis have been and still are. Sad sorry lot of useless human debris.
You want sorry excuses for human beings? Try the Christian Identity movement at Elohim City. Their "Messiah' was executed for murder the same day that Timmy McVeigh chimped out of Oklahoma City specificly because the State of Oklahoma was executing Richard "Wayne" Snell. Stop using the word "feminazi." Only boy-bumpers who can't deal with adult women use that word.
Look, if you want to start a thread about this group of people who no one has ever heard of then please knock yourself out. But try sticking to the theme of this particular post as it proves time and time again just how disengenuous this sad sack of femanazi debris truly is. And just because these femanazis are adults is no reason to give them the benefit of having a sound mind--which they certainly lack. Most of these off beat lesbos need psychiatric help--that's quite obvious. Seems to me that you've thrown various and vicious slanderous names and titles around here yourself, all of course that were totally ludicrous. So knock it off with your self righteous nonsense already.
Obvious, why? I reckon you could turn a lot of women lesbian in your company. Ewwww... Ah, must be time for some lesbian gals. Tap those feet: [video=youtube;rtUsbjyzEn4]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rtUsbjyzEn4&feature=related[/video]
Yup, lesbo gals alright, they and their lesbo comrades on the dance floor look about as un feminine as it gets.
And your role model Larball is a eunuch and not a man. I would say that the lesbos have better taste.
