I think very few do. That case is the one that enabled the very demonizing of the term 'conspiracy'....there were so many theories, so many books, so much information.....but nothing came of any of it. All we really know for sure is that the Warren Commission was a joke...beyond that it is a matter of personal beliefs or disbeliefs. So many liars and others who wanted to and in some cases did make money off exploiting the case. Eventually the term 'conspiracy theory' began to be used to attack anyone who proposed something that someone else did not like aka..........the case of Obama and his lack of a legitimate birth certificate.....those who insisted that the Supreme Court get involved were labeled conspiracy theorists and birthers...which was used big time by the media to help protect obama. Irregardless..........here is the best story I have seen regarding the assasination of JFK.....this guy may be lying....but if he is? ....a damn good one. https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct...bMorjRmhYWKLH7wfA&sig2=N8HMjR0vJm2asnlafcTLbA
The term conspiracy theory has been around for a long time and was not created as you claim. It simply refers to people who have to believe something other than the truth. Conspiracy theorists were running around claiming that the earth is flat and the rothschilds were lying about a round earth as far back as the 19th century. JFK was merely the biggest of all conspiracy theories until the 911 attacks. The Warren commission was no joke. It remains one of the most comprehensive, exhaustive and intensive criminal investigations in history. It is also quite accurate which is not to say it is perfect. The made some minor errors as all endeavors will but the conclusions are quite sound and have never been refuted with any evidence
I don't think the government will ever fess up that JFK was murdered by the person that served to gain the most, the #1 suspect, Vice President Johnson.
Lee Harvey killed the President, there isn't much to debate. The shots that the conspiracy group say could never happen have been reproduced with unquestionable accuracy and precision. The evidence supports the reality.
heh heh...,,well--I have to chuckle excuse me but my point sailed clearly over your head. My point being the 'demonizing' of the term 'conspiracy'---as in as a result of the multitude of views on the JFK assasination the term became trivialized and then was used to demonize ones opponents in all kinds of arguments and different points of views.
My point sailed over your head. My point being that of referring to how the term 'conspiracy' was enabled by the JFK controversy, to be used to 'demonize' anyone's opponent in any sort of political argument.
Evidence of Oswalds Innocence There were weaknesses in all three elements of the case against Lee Harvey Oswald as the lone assassin of President Kennedy: The first claim, that all of the shooting came from the easternmost southfacing window on the sixth floor of the Texas School Book Depository, was supported by some of the eyewitness evidence but was strongly contradicted by the medical and photographic evidence. The second claim, that Oswald had brought a rifle to work and was on the sixth floor with the rifle at the time of the shooting, was contradicted by all of the relevant, credible evidence. None of this evidence was conclusive, however, so the claim remained plausible. The third claim, that it was physically possible for a lone gunman to have caused all the known injuries with only three shots, turned out to be emphatically contradicted by the medical, photographic and eyewitness evidence. Oswald was almost certainly not the lone gunman that he was made out to be. Other evidence suggested very strongly that: Oswald had not fired a rifle at all on the day of the assassination, and a bullet was dishonestly placed into evidence in order to frame Oswald.
