how is it possible to "support" the troops.... while cheerleading their death? when they are sent to fight all these anti-israel countries... and are killed... did they die for ME... or israel? example: little billy from utah... joins the army... gets on a plane and gets killed in iraq... please tell me how billy died defending the constitution or the liberties of the american people... if you CANT... then please tell me how his death benefited his zionist overlords who sent him to kill iraqis. i support the troops living and being brought back home to their families, if you cheerlead for war,,,, you cheer the troops marching into every single country in the middle east.... then you cheerlead their death.
So Israel wags the US dog, and the UK like a baby duck follows the US anywhere no question asked. And why because the US and UK (*)(*)(*)(*)ed up in the region backing the wrong side. It's just (*)(*)(*)(*)in bill(*)(*)(*)(*). It's one think to spend billions and send 10,000 troops to help foreign poeple's when most of them want us their, like Libya. But is just wrong to do that for people who don't want us their. Atleast under the British system, the British gained wealth and power. But this current anglo system just isn't working. It has almost bankrupt our nations for nothing.
Why does it matter if they want us their or not? Do people in these countries really know what they want? I don't think so, and 10 years from now, there is going to be a leader in Libya who is a lot worse than the one they just replaced.
People don't join the military based on an individual conflict and its "legality" or justification. Hell, if you had asked the men who landed on D-Day or the guys at the Somme if their main justification in joining the attack was a desire to defeat Germany, almost all of them would have said no. I think most modern westerners are too self-centered to understand this concept.
