You can add Dutchsinse's new discovery to his first one that proved the experts wrong, and that earthquakes can be forecast. And you can add it to his second one that proved experts wrong, and that fracking does cause earthquakes. You can also add it to his third one about hot spots being near volcanic fields and igniting the forest fires. Well in this video, Dutchsinse makes another great discovery. He proves that almost all the earthquakes are near high voltage power lines, and that the earthquakes are caused either by electricity going down into the earth, or by electricity coming up from inside the earth. (Sing to the tune of: 'Over there! Over there.) Be prepared! Be prepared! For the days are coming! The days are coming, But know that you should never fear. Never fear! Never fear! We will share, Maybe? - Jeannette
Where's your video? Anyway, electricity causing earthquakes seems a little kooky to me. But, you know what else is near high voltage lines? Fracking stations. They cause earthquakes too.
Dutchsinse found that the earthquakes are near high voltage lines near fracking stations. It might have something to do with the metal beams that break through the crust and the electricity is being carried down into the earth, or maybe electricity is coming up from the earth because of the high voltage lines. He doesn't know, all he knows is that there are too many connections to be a coincidence and it should be looked into. I forgot to post the video. If I come across it, I will post it.
Sorry, but it's the fracking. Just the fracking. This has been known for years, you do a bunch of fracking, and you get a bunch of small quakes.
Dutchsinse was the first to say that fracking caused earthquakes, and everyone went against him. On his videos, he pin points the earthquakes on the satellite images. There are thousands of fracking installations, but he noticed that wherever there is an earthquake at a fracking installation, there are also high voltage lines. Yet the high voltage lines are rare, so it can't be just a coincidence.
You're running up against the inverse square field limitation. Yes, lines emit fields, but the strength will be the inverse square of the distance. In other words, after you go down a ways, a field that could blow up a car would have trouble lifting a feather. And we know those fields aren't massively destructive on the surface. The trick is to avoid fracking close to existing faults.
I am sure many things contribute to the releasing of that pressure. The planet is a complicated thing. However we have tried to cuse them with bombing, and volcanoes, and nothing happened so how much we affect them is unknown. This would be important if we plan on weaponizing it or preventing them.
What about earthquakes before 1880. Before high voltage lines? They occurred in the same localities. Could be the terrain along earthquake places make the best locale to put those lines. Agree about fracking and fear for ground water when strata barriers between it and natural gas are disrupted. Porter Ranch. Never Forget Moi Never Forget
This is how I understood Dutchsinse: Years ago he noticed that earthquakes follow certain paths, and an earthquake occurs wherever there is a weak point in the crust. When they frack, they break through the crust, and it creates weak spots. This isn't bad though for the US, since much of the pressure of the magma gets released in small quakes in places like Texas, so it doesn't accumulate at the New Madrid fault. About 2 years ago, Dutchsince pointed out to his viewers on the satellite images, that areas in Northern California, Washington State, Oregon and parts of Canada were showing up red - yet there weren't any fires. The hot spots were always around volcanic fields, and the next day fires would break out. More recently, he noticed that the hot spots were showing up not only in the Northwest, but around the New Madrid fault. Seems the geologists took notice too, because I read that troops have been sent to the areas out of fear of a major quake. Dutchsince's latest observation is that the quakes where there is fracking, are also next to high voltage power lines. He said it can't be a coincidence, because there are much too many connections. When they frack, a metal beam goes down through the crust. Dutchsince wonders if electricity is drawn into the earth from the power lines, or if it's being drawn out of the earth.
@Jeannette Seems like we are approaching a Massive Earth Crust Displacement episode. Or a volcanic mediated "cool down" or Ice Age. The electric lines people appreciate the terrain of earthquakes, not visa versa. How will our food production feed us when the cool down happens. Moi
Oh nonsense. We have known that pumping water into the ground can cause earthquakes for over 60 years now. https://repository.arizona.edu/bits...d=0123E94BA01BB7847137E297FF420F7F?sequence=1 So unless he was saying that in the 1950's, that is a lie.
Porter Ranch has nothing to do with Fracking. I know it well because I used to hike up there, and still remember the 1968 oil rig fire. The Santa Susana Mountains are largely composed of very brittle rock, and are fractured all over the place. Just take any geologist up there and they will be able to point to the fractures everywhere. It's all ancient 60 mya ocean bed, that was uplifted since then, and the fracturing is what has allowed the older oil and gas deposits from the Mesozoic under them to escape. And in that area that is well known. When they stopped the drilling there in the 1980s, they capped off the wells and a decade later started selling the land for housing. However, the pressure continued to build up, and the gas simply started escaping through the fractures in the earth. Since then a lot has been alleviated because they resumed pumping out the gas so it no longer escapes like it was before. But they were not caused by fracking, they never had to frack there. There is simply so much gas under the ground that it has to be tapped, or it will find a place to escape on its own. But it is still a problem, and will always be a problem. The same thing happens on the "Miracle Mile", as a great many buildings have wells under them or else the oil and tar that comes form the ground would fill in their basements unless it was pumped out. And many housing areas in nearby Santa Clarita still drill and pump out natural gas for the same reason. https://www.lamag.com/citythinkblog/tar-puddle-miracle-mile/ Myself, I hate the Porter Ranch community mostly because it removed one of the last natural areas in the San Fernando Valley. I can't begin to count how many hours I used to hike up there back in the day. And now, it's all houses.
Well, there is the documented phenomenon known as earthquake lights, however, the movement of the rock is the root of the electrical discharge, not the other way around that the OP is contending.
Only a few outside scenes. The housing area was actually out in Tujunga. Porter Ranch at that time was still largely wilderness.
Which is not only nonsense, it makes no sense at all. If somebody had really known the history of the New Madrid, they would know that sending troops there would be useless. The last major quakes on that fault was a swarm of them in 1811-1812. And it caused damage as far away as Washington DC, New Orleans, and Chicago. So if somebody is talking about moving troops there in case of an earthquake, you can guarantee they are full of ****. The crust east of the Rocky Mountains is very thin and brittle, and seismic waves propagate for huge distances in them, as a lot of the crust there is thin deep bedrock, with fill on top. Nothing like the thick and highly folded crust west of the Rocky Mountains. I would suggest staying away from the junk science places. All they do is cause those who read them to become even more stupid.
