Evidence for the Holocaust?

I see what we're getting at.

According to German Law, the Jews had committed a crime and were enemies of the state.

Therefore their internment was legal.

And it was only logical for the Germans to feed the law-abiding people first, so first the soldiers then the civilians and finally the inmates got fed.

And during war, there is a lack of food. So if 5 million Jewish inmates died due to lack of food, its not murder, just a lack of resources.



DISGUSTING!!!!!!!!!

 

The Jewish Bolshevik Holodomor is infinitely more disgusting.

 

tens of thousands of Jews died in the Holodomor.

 

And what has that got to do with discussing the Holocaust other than a cheap attempt to divert from the awkward question you have been asked

 

It isn't an awkward question. Screaming 'disgusting' and 'murder' because some Jews starved is the emotive distraction from the topic.

- - - Updated - - -

5 milion didn't starve. This is an insane exaggeration and pure fiction.

 

No your avoidance of the question what they were doing in concentration camps to begin with

Tell that to the widows of the 5.1 million Soviet POWs who starved in camps during the same period

 

you're right, most were shot or gassed to death.

 

Evidence?

 

Source:
http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/Holocaust/history.html

+

In 2010 a Catholic priest was discovered 700 extermination sites in East Europe, including 10-15 mass graves, on those sites and mass graves 1.5 milion Jews were killed (apart from the 6 million that were killed).

Eichmann in his trail in Israel, he told Hoettl (he was asked him questions about the Jews and the Holocaust) that 6 milion Jews were exterminated after the "Final Solution" were taken place. 4 million in Jews extermination camps and the rest 2 million "through shooting by the Operations Units and other causes, such as deases etc."

Source: http://www.haaretz.com/jewish-world/jewish-world-features/.premium-1.540880

You have a lot that were killed before the "Final Solution" took place, and before the "Final Solution" the Nazis didnt write how much Jews they 've been killed.

 

Sorry but asserting something isn't evidence.

 

It is not asserting anything. Table with numbers is fact (and if not, how much Jews were killed in Poland?), words that Eichmann said are facts.
Stop evoiding the facts- YOU wanted it.

 

No, he doesn't. If you engraved it on a six inch nail and drove it into his skull, he'd still not get it.

 

Thats sad.

 

The purpose of putting them in camps was to ensure that they died or at least suffered greatly. To my mind that is deliberate activity likely to end in death.

But I can see that certain people don't believe that Jews should live, or if they live enjoy measurable freedom or national self-determination. Why should the Holocaust Deniers not admit that?

 

Lmao.

You should check out the Eichmann interview in Argentina. I can supply you with the original German transcript if you don't have it.

 

since when were you interested in evidence?

you disregard all evidence that counters your pre-conceived notions of truth.

its funny that you dent the Holocaust while you also call for all Jews to be killed.

 

Perhaps it's worth a try, just in case.

 

If you didnt sew in my comment, but I also gave you what Eichmann said in his trail in Israel
Once again:

 

Please don't ever become an educator. Our students don't need to be force-fed faux history.

 

Were those childrens' sleepaway camps of the kind that suburban New Yorkers often are sent to? </sarcasm>

 

Please, don't waste any more of my time. The points I've been making have been made by academics many times before, but you want to stick to personal attacks instead of substantive discussion.

http://holocaust-education.dk/

 

suggesting that 5 million Jews died of incidental starvation and not intentional murder is called "Holocaust Denial".

- - - Updated - - -

They were put in the camps to work and to die. This is a fact.

 

Weren't the incarcerated or encamped Jews Germany's responsibility as soon as they were put there against their will?

Personal attack?

I can't figure out your agenda. Are you saying that the Nazis were kindly to the Jews?

 

He thinks its not a crime that millions of Jews may have starved to death in the death camps and concentration camps. Its just something that happens in war time, where they have to prioritize food distribution for soldiers, civilians, and prisoners. The Jews were prisoners so they naturally got the least amount of food and millions died. Butt his doesn't show any intent upon the Nazis to kill millions of Jews, its just bad luck.

 

Or the Allies' fault for deigning to fight them.

Some of the most horrifying reasoning I've read.