Evolution is racist

Discussion in 'Race Relations' started by mikemikev, Aug 12, 2012.

  1. Akhlut

    Akhlut Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2008
    Messages:
    1,805
    Likes Received:
    10
    Trophy Points:
    38
    http://www.talkorigins.org/indexcc/CA/CA005_2.html

    The text is quite clear on the matter that Darwin is referring to races as being differing groups within species that differential survival rates cause new species to emerge by virtue of natural selection.

    Race referring to varieties within a group, not human races.
     
  2. mikemikev

    mikemikev Banned

    Joined:
    May 6, 2012
    Messages:
    3,796
    Likes Received:
    34
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Are you denying that there are varieties within the human species?
     
  3. Akhlut

    Akhlut Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2008
    Messages:
    1,805
    Likes Received:
    10
    Trophy Points:
    38
    They are very minor and most of the differences are found in the foundation population of humanity, ie, Africans. Genetic variability is highest amount the peoples of east Africa, while genetic variability is much smaller in populations outside of Africa.
     
  4. mikemikev

    mikemikev Banned

    Joined:
    May 6, 2012
    Messages:
    3,796
    Likes Received:
    34
    Trophy Points:
    0
    http://www.scirp.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?paperID=19566

    Africans developed high diversity by back mixing with non-Human lineages.

    And that variation is largely in junk DNA. That variation which differentiates races could be doing anything. You have no idea. You are making up that it is "minor". Making it up.
     
  5. leftysergeant

    leftysergeant New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2012
    Messages:
    8,827
    Likes Received:
    60
    Trophy Points:
    0
    No, they mated with other fully human stocks. There was sufficient range and over-lappping that they had a diverse gene pool from which to choose. The new mutations could be spread about through a larger population, which fix the more desireable mutations with losing any of the original characteristics that were still of some benefit.
     
  6. leftysergeant

    leftysergeant New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2012
    Messages:
    8,827
    Likes Received:
    60
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Black people have a better claim on this country than you have. They did not come here from somewhere else. Their ancestors were brought here against their will. You are benefitting from the work that black people did. Stop snivelling. You will just have to live with them.
     
  7. Akula

    Akula Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2011
    Messages:
    1,859
    Likes Received:
    30
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Delusions.

    White people founded and built this country. Negroes played a small part. I'm not benefiting from anything any negro did.
    The negroes who were brought here were better off living here than staying in africa and being a slave to some african warlord...but I've said many times, slavery was the WORST thing this country ever did. Look at the damage negroes have caused in just the past 150 years.
    Let them talk about killing white people and their babies and killing "crackers" and whatever. They need to be very careful with all that.
    If they keep it up, one day there WILL be repercussions.
    People are getting tired of the drag on society they cause with their disproportionate levels of crime and violence.

    Let them keep agitating. White people angered are a mighty force to reckon with.

    An aside; What about negroes in africa who captured, bought, sold and held slaves? What about slavery in africa today?
    What about negroes in AMERICA that bought, sold and held slaves?

    Anti whites like you always duck those uncomfortable subjects.
     
  8. mikemikev

    mikemikev Banned

    Joined:
    May 6, 2012
    Messages:
    3,796
    Likes Received:
    34
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Again you are just making stuff up in the face of the latest genetic evidence. Africans are a hybrid of Eurasian origin Sapiens and African non-Humans. The higher genetic diversity was found in the non-Humans they mixed with. I realise how much of hole that blows in your "Negroes are actually better than you" propaganda, but there it is.
     
  9. mutmekep

    mutmekep New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2012
    Messages:
    6,223
    Likes Received:
    46
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Trying to pass scientific data while using the non scientific term of race ...

    LOL

    0/10 for your post go back to high school
     
  10. mutmekep

    mutmekep New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2012
    Messages:
    6,223
    Likes Received:
    46
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Expanded post to avoid flaming :

    Humans can not breed with non-humans , it is not possible to produce fertile offspring with other great apes .
    You probably mean not Homo Sapient but we were not the only species of the genus Homo ( who by the way were all human , this is what homo means ) . As DNA sequencing has proven non Africans have mixed with Neanderthals , Denisovans and probably other human species that have been around during the last 200.000 years , Africans do have some Neanderthal traces but those are very limited when compared to non Africans .
    The fact that Africans are more genetically varied is because they are older ( Homo Sapient originates in Africa ) and because non Africans are coming from a single maternal line , this means that from the 10.000 humans alive 70.000 years ago only like 250-400 walked from the motherland to Yemen and from there expanded into the rest of the world .
     
  11. Mr. Swedish Guy

    Mr. Swedish Guy New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2012
    Messages:
    11,688
    Likes Received:
    87
    Trophy Points:
    0
    mutmekep, that really explained it to me. Now I finally understand this "there's more genetic variation in africa and ble ble.." argument, even though it's pointless most of the time. Thank you.
     
  12. J0NAH

    J0NAH Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2011
    Messages:
    8,047
    Likes Received:
    18
    Trophy Points:
    0
    laughing my sorry a$$ off.

    What an utter load of jibberish was the rest of your post that alluded to some contrived revisionist history.

    White ppl angered ha, pitiful. You my friend are a sorry example of white ppl, you shame my tribe and for that I cast you out with the witches of scandalnavia, be gone, heathen, banish thee to the outerlands of the cold, dark nether worlds.

    What a sorry discourse, white ppl angered, lol indeed. When I see fit to be bothered with this pathetic attempt at discussion then I will uphold my simple duty of educating you of your own history, as of now don't even attempt to discuss anothers. Is that clear, peon?
     
  13. J0NAH

    J0NAH Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2011
    Messages:
    8,047
    Likes Received:
    18
    Trophy Points:
    0
    No they don't. Ppl don't know the history that's all. All of your jibberish is un substantiated. There is simply no discussion to be made. White ppl enslaved so- called africans for 400 years, the story is about to be completed, that of your subjugation., blessed be.
     
  14. Akula

    Akula Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2011
    Messages:
    1,859
    Likes Received:
    30
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Yes. In other words you've abandoned your weak position for lack of facts to support anything you claim and resorted to juvenile insults to hide your failure.
    Go it..
    You're exposed. everyone sees it. Keep kicking up dust and stomping your feet...You haven't fooled anyone.
     
  15. Akula

    Akula Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2011
    Messages:
    1,859
    Likes Received:
    30
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Missed this one..
    Let me see..where do I start dissecting this foolishness;

    Ok..

    Only you have the gift of understanding..the rest of "ppl (sic) don't know the history" ..sure..sure...whatever you say...LMAO.. :roll:

    No no no....negroes enslaved their OWN people and held them as slaves..The stupidest ones got sold to the jews who then shipped them west and sold them to white people.
    By whom?
    Negroes? LMMFAO...do the math. There aren't enough of them even if every man woman and child among them took up arms.

    Not to mention the hundreds of thousands of them that are in prison already or too doped up to function....
    Hell..even THEY know it.

    [video=youtube;7VqG_4ADFfQ]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7VqG_4ADFfQ[/video]
     
  16. mikemikev

    mikemikev Banned

    Joined:
    May 6, 2012
    Messages:
    3,796
    Likes Received:
    34
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Well, you can call them humans if you want. The latest genetic evidence indicates the main ancestor of all modern Sapiens arose in Eurasia and back-mixed with older lineages (whether you call them humans or not is largely irrelevant) after going into Africa to form Negroids.

    Simply asserting the opposite in the face of genetic evidence isn't really a strong point.
     
  17. mikemikev

    mikemikev Banned

    Joined:
    May 6, 2012
    Messages:
    3,796
    Likes Received:
    34
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Everyone enslaved Africans. Arabs held ten times as many and treated them worse.

    http://www.ironbarkresources.com/slaves/index.html

    But all we here from the anti-White Marxists is of course the old "evil whitey" line. This is because they hate white Christian civilization, because they are jealous.
     
  18. J0NAH

    J0NAH Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2011
    Messages:
    8,047
    Likes Received:
    18
    Trophy Points:
    0
    That depends on whether they wanted to do that but the 'who' enslaves white ppl is not as important as the actual karma in practice.
     
  19. J0NAH

    J0NAH Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2011
    Messages:
    8,047
    Likes Received:
    18
    Trophy Points:
    0
    What position was that again?:neutral:
     
  20. Akula

    Akula Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2011
    Messages:
    1,859
    Likes Received:
    30
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The one you abandoned.

    Depends on whether WHO wanted to do WHAT? Explain what you're talking about.

    Who is going to "enslave white people"..Again..explain what you're talking about.

    What "actual karma in practice"? What does that mean specifically?
     
  21. Colonel K

    Colonel K Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    9,770
    Likes Received:
    556
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Horse(*)(*)(*)(*). You have no such evidence.
     
  22. mikemikev

    mikemikev Banned

    Joined:
    May 6, 2012
    Messages:
    3,796
    Likes Received:
    34
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The evidence is in the link. Can you read?
     
  23. J0NAH

    J0NAH Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2011
    Messages:
    8,047
    Likes Received:
    18
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Which one did I abandon?

    White ppl will face the consequences, why do you think you are an exception to the universal law? You think you are god?
     
  24. mikemikev

    mikemikev Banned

    Joined:
    May 6, 2012
    Messages:
    3,796
    Likes Received:
    34
    Trophy Points:
    0
    "All white people" will face "the consequences"? LMAO. This has nothing to do with any law or justice. This is just irrational anti-white hate.

    You are one disturbed individual.

    Tell us why you hate white people?

    What group are you from Jonah?
     
  25. J0NAH

    J0NAH Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2011
    Messages:
    8,047
    Likes Received:
    18
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I don't think so.
     

Share This Page