President Obama was the perfect avatar for the Bourgeoisie. He was able to put the masses to sleep while expanding Bush's unpopular wars in the Middle East. He made liberals feel warm and fuzzy inside. Trump makes them feel icky. https://greenwald.substack.com/p/a-long-forgotten-cia-document-from?s=09
Like our Lib compadres here never tire of crowing, "normalcy is a'comin' back to town!". Tell the grave diggers at Arlington business is about to pick up.
So a speculative paper generated by group specifically mandated to think outside the box is actually representative of a dastardly CIA domestic political policy which favored Obama.. This means of course that they and the rest of the deep state have been desperately trying to get rid of Trump over the last four years. Such is the brilliance of the conspiracy minded partisan. Red Cell
~ Yes indeed. And apparently for a significant portion of America "warm and fuzzy" is more important . Truth, liberty and justice not so much.
Your post shows the wisdom of the notion that it is easier to fool a man than it is to explain to him how he has been fooled.
Obama was raised in the shadow of CIA influence because his mother worked for CIA supervised organizations such as the East West Institute. He was truly a Manchurian Candidate.
(I don't have time to watch the OP video right now) I don't think that Obama was a wide-sung hero in the intelligence community. He armed Jihadist rebels in Syria publicly, and made so many red lines, and let Syria's Assad walk all over them without consequences. If anything they (the intel. community) was happy to see Obama go.
We're forgetting Obama went against the UN and international law, so he could destroy Assad, who was the most tolerant and all inclusive leader in the Middle East. Our government armed and supported terrorists who were committing genocide against Christians at the rate of 300 a day, while the MSM kept it hidden from the American people. Whenever Assad's army was defeating the terrorists, the US and UK's White Helmet terrorist group, would commit their false flag chemical attack so we could bomb the Syrian army and keep the war going on. Millions of Syrians became refugees so that Syria would fall either under sharia law or Balkanized. But Syria is not the first nation to suffer from our policies. Yugoslavia was broken up for the same reason at the expense of the Serbs, and Ukraine probably will since the situation there is not sustainable. We also have our destruction of Libya, so what is the common denominator? Well for one, they all had good relations with Russia, and that was a no-no since it's a Christian nation and a threat to the 'liberal' new world order of the globalists. Muslim nations though are not a threat. You figure! The question is, have we done anything less that Adolph Hitler did in WWII? I don't think so!
On the plus side... President Obama did stop Hillary in 2008........ I believe that she could have been much, much much worse!
and the social media networks don't contribute to the most idiotic conspiracy theories that become some peoples truth.
Cool! A genuine conspiracy theorist is among us! I am curious. Could you explain how you deduced Obama was a "Manchurian Candidate"?
Non Sequitur / Fallacious gibberish - dressing up an Ad Hom attack - in a desperate attempt to apologize for yet another disturbing event in the life of our beloved CIA. This is not the only evidence for the CIA being a tool of the Military Industrial Complex. The Trump thing is a different issue - disagree that Trump was not a friend of the MIC.
They are absolutely right that the reason the world is in the mess it is in today is because the West, apart from France of course, has forgotten how to protest...and even more to keep in touch with what is going on....though the information provided by mainstream media may have something to do with this. US apparently used to have 50 Independent sources providing the financial resources for the Media in the 70's. Now apparently it is five and pretty much the same agenda, and they certainly since 9/11 have worked hard to make sure people cannot protest whether it is by creating social norms about people being unpatriotic or having websites which try to ruin the future career of students if they have a not liked political position or in France, unbelievably, up to one year in jail for voicing support for BDS. This they are keeping to even though the European Court ruled against them not allowing French people free speech and ordered France to stop doing this and financially compensate those who have already been found guilty of promoting BDS. However stopping genuine democratic protest needed for countries to be democracies is done and it is well known now how to do it. They also know how to promote the kind of mindset they want - for example hatred of Muslims....and Obama was worse than Bush with his droning, much worse killing innocents. Not being American I am unsure exactly what these were but I know when he was leaving office that a lot of people were very worried about things he had put in place which Trump could then use possibly in a fascist way. They were asking him to end these laws. I think some were to do with refugees and another was bringing in a law where it would be possible to keep people indefinately in jail without trial. This was apparently for suspected terrorists but obviously goes against Democratic values. I do not think Obama did change any of the things he was asked to but I think Trump was no better. Indeed although he appears to be the first President since Carter who did not start a war, I have heard that he has made the US Military far more involved and lethal in various countries than they even were under Obama and of course with regard to immigrants taking that to the worst level - seperating kids from their parents. My belief is that it is protecting neo liberalism that is up to this and of course with the US Government the fact that everyone in it is dependent on Oligarchs and so is bought and there to serve the Oligarch not the people.
FYI, Nixon did something like Red Cell, and they screwed up monumentally. The CIA does intel, Red Cell moves into policy territory and combining the two is a terrible idea.
We are all conspiracy theorists pretty much. Some believe official conspiracy theories, of which there are many, whilst others are skeptical of the official ones and consider and often embrace alternative theories. Lance DeHaven-Smith did an excellent study of the term and the phenomenon in his book "Conspiracy Theory in America" in 2013. Having read a biography of his mother entitled A Singular Woman, I learned about much of his childhood. His mother worked for and with entities such as the East West Institute and the Ford Foundation, both with ties to the CIA. Thus, he was raised in the shadow of the Agency. Having observed his 2 two terms in the White House it became most plausible that he was serving Agency/Deep State goals. Thus it's plausible that he had been groomed for the position.
