Fani Willis inquiry is about to have a Round 2

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/...illis-disqualification-georgia-appeals-court/

The Fulton County judge determined there was a conflict of interest that could only be solved with Fani's lover being removed from the case.The defense says she also has to go because she is the one who created the conflict in the first place. Additionally, his presence tainted the investigation and grand jury process. They appealed his ruling using his own words against Fani.

The appellate court just agreed to hear the case. This means two things that the die-hard lefties will be pissed off about:

1. There is effectively little to no chance of having a verdict in this case before the election.
2. Fani will be back in the headlines day after day, reminding America how corrupt these prosecutions are.

There is more evidence the defense has against Fani that they were not allowed to introduce to Scott McAfee, I'm sure they will be pushing to get it out there. Additionally, the state is investigating her as well and whatever they find could be used against her.

 

The Democrats' lawfare campaign isn't going very well.

They were expecting at least one conviction by now and they're further away from a conviction now than they were when they started.

 

and IF the supreme court rules for even partial immunity... it all goes passed the election....

Just a question.... partial immunity means what? Will each and every bump in the road will have to be scrutinized?? And the bigger question WHO will be the scrutinizers.

 

You want a criminal to go free because the prosecutor had sex with somebody. And the criminal who would walk is himself a sexual abuser, no less. Kinda reminds one of the definition of a "cult".

 

When you're guilty: Avoid the facts, argue the law and dig dirt up on your accusers. The fact that you cheerlead for the perp is... sad.

 

I don't recall any such expectation. The only expectation I recall is that Trump will TRY to avoid having any trials before the election in order to be in a better position to get rid of the trials, particularly the federal ones.

 

Official vs private acts seems pretty straightforward. I wouldn't fault them at all for going with that. It's unfortunate that the impeachment process is so broken than even an egregious and evil official act would go unpunished (rather, it would depend entirely on which party controls what), but we also can't make it so the president is unable to function in official acts. Private acts? No need for the presidency to shield somebody from accountability there, at least once he/she is out of office.

 

The appeals court’s decision to consider the case seems likely to cause a delay in a case and further reduce the possibility that it will get to trial before the November general election, when Trump is expected to be the Republican nominee for president.

Just like the immunity case, a court controlled by Repubs has aided and abetted Trump's goal of delaying justice.

http://www.politicalforum.com/index.php?threads/the-pot-circles-the-wagons.618521/

 

The expectation was to get a conviction before the election. That's why the big rush on all the trials.

 

Not an expectation, but certainly a worthy goal. The voters deserve to know if they're voting for a criminal. An innocent person wouldn't need to rely on delay as a defense.

 

I agree. But Trump has plenty of people in power who are on his side in his quest to deny the voters the knowledge they need with respect to Individual 1's guilt or innocence in the eyes of a jury. For example.........

Judge Cannon indefinitely postpones Trump’s classified docs trial

“[F]inalization of a trial date at this juncture — before resolution of the myriad and interconnected pre-trial and [classified evidence] issues … would be imprudent and inconsistent with the Court’s duty to fully and fairly consider the various pending pre-trial motions,” Cannon wrote in the five-page order.
https://www.politico.com/news/2024/05/07/trump-classified-docs-trial-delay-florida-00156680

What her ruling obfuscates is the foot dragging she's engaged in thus far by failing to make decisions on the pre-trial motions in a timely way.

Cannon, the GA appeals court, the SC, they're all working in concert with one goal in mind. Help Trump win the election.

 

Yeah, definitely an expectation.

Do you mind if I quote you?...

"It would be nice if voters can know if Trump is a criminal before the election..."

 

The prosecution team and the FBI got caught falsifying evidence.

 

It's a plausible hypothesis. Perhaps they should be investigated. Though that is only possible if Trump loses.

 

Agree to disagree on what expectation means, lol.

 

Link it.

 

"a strong belief that something will happen or be the case in the future."

 

https://www.declassified.live/p/the-dojs-doctored-crime-scene-photo

 

Brah, Julie Kelly is a consipracy crackpot. A freakin' disinformation nut case....good God.

 

She quoted Jay Bratt, a member of the prosecution team. Feel free to debunk the evidence.

 

Yes, didn't have an expectation. More an opinion that it would be appropriate, and should be considered in expediting the cases if it can be done so while still having fair trials.

 

Source notwithstanding, I now know what you are referring to. No, this was not falsifying evidence. But it is a headache caused by some sloppiness of FBI agents. Not a headache that has any real bearing on the relevant facts of the case, though.

 

Not only are you expecting a conviction before the election, but you want Trump's rights to be violated in the process...lol

 

False and false. Do you really need to rely on mischaracterizing posts to pretend you have a point?

 

The claim you are making is total fake news, no court has considered this nor has any "evidence" been investigated or substiantiated. It's the definition of fake news and Kelly is a nut case.
Why would some Trump supporters stoop this low?