Gary Mack.Traiter and disgrace to america and patriotic americans

Gary mack as most serious researchers know,USED to be a partriot himself.He used to be a serious reseacher.

He has lived in dallas texas his whole life and he used to write articles all the time exposing the lies of the warren commission that oswald was the lone assassin posting articles of information posted over the years how it was mostly a CIA operation over the years and how they were behind it all.

Now he has sold out americans seeking the truth about the JFK assassination because now he is the curater of the 6th foor museum and watches over it endorcing the lies of the warren commission now after being a serious reseacher in it for over 30 years.

The government obviously offered him a sweet deal and he went for the money.Too bad for him because he is going to find out in the end money cant buy you happined and will suffer miserably eternally for the rest of his life for his partipation in this coverup.

He either decided to go bad after all these years because of the money or friends and family members of his were threatened.one or the two.I only hope for his sake it was the latter since if its the FORMER,he is going to suffer very badly in the future years with the karma he will be brining down on himself being the traiter he decided to be.

 

Or rather he realized there is no evidence of a conspiracy and took a job with a paycheck.

 

'Traiter'?

 

This part of the post is true.

 

The shots that were fired could have been fired by a trained and well practiced sniper as I myself could have made those shots with that Italian made rifle.....but what I could not make happen is the Magic Bullet change trajectory in mid air and then travel in another vectored direction and then do this several more times.

AboveAlpha

 

that sounds like a threat.

are your threatening him?

 

I am not all that familiar with Gary Mack but from an hour or so of reading some of his material online it appears that he has worked with the handlers for so long that it is better for him to appease them than oppose them. What I find interesting is that most JFK classified documents are scheduled to be released in 2017. That is only a few years away and will hopefully clear up many questions. It is obvious to me that JFK was killed by a bullet that came from the front. A shot to the right temporal area from the driver is certainly consistent with the angle of JKF's head at the moment of the fatal shot and the blown out back of his head, as described by the medical staff from Parkland Hospital, and as seen in the Zapruder film. More information about Gary Mack here.

- - - Updated - - -

That's ridiculous.

 

Guess you haven't seen the latest Zapruder stabilization, which shows Jackie O jamming a handgun under JFK's chin and busting a huge to finish the job.

 

That didn't happen.

 

What didn't happen?

AboveAlpha

 

It never changed direction as you describe nor did anyone claim it changed direction in such a manner.

The bullet traveled a normal ballistic path with no significant changes in direction until it struck Connally in the wrist altering it's direction of travel by less than thirty degress and causing it to end up in his left thigh. Until that moment the wounds all line up with no changes in " vector ". One can easily expect a bullet to change direction when striking dens bone so that last change is not significant.

Many people could have made the shots that Oswald made they were easy shots with ample time. Many have done it with identicl ammo and rifles. It was not a challenge for the average graduate of Marine corps basi training.

- - - Updated - - -

Yes I have and it shows no such thing

 

The driver would have shot him in the left side of the front of his head not the right.

The driver did not fire a gun anyways and the physical evidence proves an antrance wound from behind

- - - Updated - - -

\

The bullet changing directions.

 

Explain these diagrams of this bullets trajectory.

LINK...https://www.google.com/search?q=mag...-who-killed-president-kennedy-64.html;768;681

AboveAlpha

 

Hog wash. You are assuming that the bullet remained cylindrical throughout the process.

Ever hear of a "boomarang?"

 

WHichone?

The link shows over tenjty diagrams from many different sources each one significantly different.

As I said it did not change direction until it struck Connally's wrist and then only a small amount this is proven by the seating arrangement of the limo. The bucket seats in the middle which COnnally and his wife were sitting in placed them inboard and lower than The Kennedy's in the back seat. Many of those diagrams ignore that fact to create a swerving zigzagging bullet path which is why they are false.

 

A High Velocity Sniper Round does not do this.

It would have gone right through the body and the force and inertial of the angled downward vector of the shot would not allow a round to bounce up.

There is one thing in particular that was covered up very well.

Several Ballistics Experts along with some Mathematicians and Physicists were able to calculate that the amount of force and inertia that the bullet achieved would not have allowed such a trajectory nor would the round have enough upward inertia to do as described.

It is simple...F=MA...or Force = Mass x Acceleration.

The results are not consistent with the inertia and mass of the shot or round.

AboveAlpha

 

Yes they are perfectly consistent with the mass and intertia and all the laws of physics because it DID NOT bounce up whatsoever.

It traveled a normal ballistic path with no change in direction until it struck Connally in the wrist.

You keep ascribing movements to the bullet which never happened and which no one claimed happened.

Only conspiracy theorists claim that the government lied about such things but the government never made such tings and therefore could not have lied.

 

OK...I will tell you what.

Answer this question and I will change my opinion.

The round that struck JFK's head caused the BACK OF HIS HEAD TO BLOW OUT EXPLOSIVELY TO THE POINT WHERE A PART OF SKULL WITH HAIR was blown onto the vehicles trunk and Jackie dove to get it.

Now when a Human Head is shot by a round of this size and force it will leave a small entry wound and exist the head EXPLOSIVELY.

How is it possible that if the shot came from behind JFK...the back of his head blew out explosively in the direction of the trunk and the front did not?

AboveAlpha

 

The head is a round object and there is no standard commonality among bullet wounds to the head.

For example it is very common for a thug to stand very close to someone when shooting them in the head and get spalttered all over by brain matter and blood.

Yes JFK's brain matter and blood flew everywhere. Forward, backward to the side etc.

Had bothered to check the evidence you may have found that the autopsy CLEARLY found the small entrance wound you describe in the abck of the head.

The bullet passed through at a slight angle which caused the skull to blow out in the back and right side. The entrance wound they found is clearly consistent with this.

Obviously you will not look at the proven evidence which has been published for decades but continue to believe what someone with a video on you tube says.

 

This is evidenced by the medical team who saw Kennedy first after he had been shot. Numerous medical staff testified to this fact.

 

You are talking bull. In the video JFK's head is impacted from the FRONT and with the inertia of the round striking the front of the head his head moves back and to the left.

The rear of his head explosively blows out.

AboveAlpha

 

As I stated...look at the size of this hole in the back of JFK's head.

THERE IS NO WAY THE SHOT CAME FROM THE REAR....an entry would could not make a hole this large in the back of JFK's head.

AboveAlpha

 

The second bullet didn't change trajectory in mid air and then travel in another vectored direction and then do this several more times.

 

Yes there is way and I am stating fact.

You forget he was in a moving vehicle and the head exploded everywhere not just in one direction as such head wounds do.

Material and bullet fragments were recovered from the front of the limo as well.

Why do you keep ignoring the fact that the autopsy PROVED that the bullet entrance wound was in the back.

Notice how the doctors you describe all stated opinion based on a quick and casual glance none of them stated that they saw AN ENTRANCE wound.

They do not challenge the autopsy anymore than any first responders impression challenges an indepth investigation

 

Look again.

She finished off Johnny.

Then she scrambled to pick up the evidence...shells and brains.