Global warming just ended

Discussion in 'Environment & Conservation' started by sawyer, Nov 9, 2016.

  1. sawyer

    sawyer Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2012
    Messages:
    11,892
    Likes Received:
    2,768
    Trophy Points:
    113
    When obama was elected he was going to stop the rising seas, stop ice from melting, stop polar bears from going extinct, stop the rise in C02 levels etc etc etc. Trump will really stop global warming though, it's officially over. Get ready for new wells, new pipelines,new refineries etc etc etc. The hoax has had its day and now we move on to reality.

    "On Jan. 18, after Sanders had attacked Trump’s climate change views in the Democratic debate, Trump told Fox & Friends, "Well, I think the climate change is just a very, very expensive form of tax. A lot of people are making a lot of money. I know much about climate change. I'd be — received environmental awards. And I often joke that this is done for the benefit of China. Obviously, I joke. But this is done for the benefit of China, because China does not do anything to help climate change. They burn everything you could burn; they couldn't care less. They have very — you know, their standards are nothing. But they — in the meantime, they can undercut us on price. So it's very hard on our business."

    http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-m...nald-trump-did-call-climate-change-chinese-h/
     
  2. waltky

    waltky Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2009
    Messages:
    30,071
    Likes Received:
    1,204
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Granny says, "Dat's right...
    :grandma:
    ... gonna get cold dis winter."
     
  3. lemmiwinx

    lemmiwinx Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2016
    Messages:
    8,069
    Likes Received:
    5,430
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Judging by the election results it's obvious global warming isn't the hot button issue Democrat politicians need to run on. Nobody cares except them and their brainwashed sycophants. A consensus of Trump voters think burning coal and oil for energy makes sense.
     
  4. politicalcenter

    politicalcenter Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2011
    Messages:
    11,132
    Likes Received:
    6,818
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    After much reflection and thought I voted for Trump. But it was not because of global warming. It is still a major problem that should be addressed. I voted for Trump to send a message that I will not fall in line with the status quo. I will not vote for someone that will sell the average voter for cash. Besides... taxes will not solve the global warming problem.
     
  5. sawyer

    sawyer Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2012
    Messages:
    11,892
    Likes Received:
    2,768
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Trump's victory means global warming will move off the front burner and not to the back burner either. It will be set on a shelf to get cold get old and eventually be thrown out in the trash as it should be. Government funding for these pseudo scientist feeding at the taxpayer expense will dry up and they will have to find real jobs. Global warming is over!
     
  6. cjm2003ca

    cjm2003ca Active Member

    Joined:
    May 8, 2011
    Messages:
    3,648
    Likes Received:
    16
    Trophy Points:
    38
    finally the truth will come out that they have been lying for years.. did they ever tell the truth that the ice at the south pole is really 9000 feet thick?.. no
     
  7. politicalcenter

    politicalcenter Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2011
    Messages:
    11,132
    Likes Received:
    6,818
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    No, the earth will keep getting warmer. And man will be the cause. An election can't change that fact.
     
  8. Ddyad

    Ddyad Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2015
    Messages:
    53,678
    Likes Received:
    25,615
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The Global Warming Movement has been chilled to the bone.
     
  9. sawyer

    sawyer Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2012
    Messages:
    11,892
    Likes Received:
    2,768
    Trophy Points:
    113
    And if it does nobody will care and no money will be spent to fight a naturally occurring climate that has been warming since the last ice age and will continue to do so until we enter the next ice age. The AGW party is over, turn out the lights and go home
     
  10. vino909

    vino909 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2014
    Messages:
    4,634
    Likes Received:
    40
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Time to plan on finishing the oil pipeline
     
  11. Vegas giants

    Vegas giants Banned

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2016
    Messages:
    49,909
    Likes Received:
    5,343
    Trophy Points:
    113
    This I guarantee you. The GOP now controls the presidency, the house and the senate. They control verey dollar spent in the US. I guarntee you that every science agency in the world will remain in agreement that AGW is real. But why? What about their funding?????
     
  12. AFM

    AFM Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2014
    Messages:
    36,672
    Likes Received:
    8,853
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Why are CO2 emissions now the cause of global warming when the history of the Roman warm period, dark ages cool period, Medieval Warm Period, Little Ice Age, and the first ~70 years of the current warming period which all took place at constant CO2 concentration ??
     
  13. AFM

    AFM Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2014
    Messages:
    36,672
    Likes Received:
    8,853
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You have answered your own question. They agree because they are funded to agree. It's a pretty good gig for a climate scientist. And that is why the history of the Roman warm period, dark ages cool period, Medieval Warm Period, Little Ice Age, and the first ~70 years of the current warming period which all took place at constant CO2 concentration is suppressed at the highest priority.
     
  14. Vegas giants

    Vegas giants Banned

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2016
    Messages:
    49,909
    Likes Received:
    5,343
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You must have difficulty reading. The GOP does not believe in AGW....why would they fund it?
     
  15. sawyer

    sawyer Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2012
    Messages:
    11,892
    Likes Received:
    2,768
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Government funding for this hoax will end under Trump
     
  16. AFM

    AFM Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2014
    Messages:
    36,672
    Likes Received:
    8,853
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The GOP does not control the budgets of all the countries in the world especially the Europeans who would rather cripple their economies than defend themselves.
     
  17. Vegas giants

    Vegas giants Banned

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2016
    Messages:
    49,909
    Likes Received:
    5,343
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Ok. So you think in a year there will be scientific agencies that openly deny AGW? Really?

    - - - Updated - - -

    Lets just discuss US scientific agencies. NASA, NOAA....etc. They will all deny AGW in about a year....right?
     
  18. AFM

    AFM Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2014
    Messages:
    36,672
    Likes Received:
    8,853
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Senator Inhofe will lead the charge. :smile:

    - - - Updated - - -

    Maybe they will be tasked with answering the question: "And that is why the history of the Roman warm period, dark ages cool period, Medieval Warm Period, Little Ice Age, and the first ~70 years of the current warming period which all took place at constant CO2 concentration is suppressed at the highest priority?" before any funding is dedicated to AGW work ?? Of course our resident alarmists have already debunked all of that because of a 20 minute YouTube video.
     
  19. Vegas giants

    Vegas giants Banned

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2016
    Messages:
    49,909
    Likes Received:
    5,343
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You are terriffied to answer the question! LOL
     
  20. AFM

    AFM Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2014
    Messages:
    36,672
    Likes Received:
    8,853
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The answer is clear. The globe has gone through at least two recent warming and cooling cycles (2000 years) in the Holocene of temperature maximums greater than today's temperature in the current warming period which had nothing to do with CO2 concentration. Although there is most likely a small component of current warming resulting from CO2 concentration increases there is no reason to conclude that CO2 concentration is driving global warming.
     
  21. Vegas giants

    Vegas giants Banned

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2016
    Messages:
    49,909
    Likes Received:
    5,343
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Awwww. Now I feel bad for you. I asked you a direct question and you are terriffied of the answer. LOL
     
  22. AFM

    AFM Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2014
    Messages:
    36,672
    Likes Received:
    8,853
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I guess there is some kind of satirical content in the above ^^ ?? Can anyone explain it ??
     
  23. Vegas giants

    Vegas giants Banned

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2016
    Messages:
    49,909
    Likes Received:
    5,343
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Whatever you do.....don't answer the question directly!!!! LOL
     
  24. politicalcenter

    politicalcenter Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2011
    Messages:
    11,132
    Likes Received:
    6,818
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Because CO2 is not the only thing that can cause warming. How many times do we have to go through this?
     
  25. AFM

    AFM Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2014
    Messages:
    36,672
    Likes Received:
    8,853
    Trophy Points:
    113
    What caused the warming before ??

    - - - Updated - - -

    I thought I did but apparently not ?? It must be this YouTube science thought process that I just don't get ??
     

Share This Page