God Commands Racial Segregation--forbids Mongrelization

Discussion in 'Race Relations' started by Libhater, Mar 27, 2011.

  1. l4zarus

    l4zarus Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2012
    Messages:
    886
    Likes Received:
    20
    Trophy Points:
    18

    LMAO :D:D:D

    Source please?
     
  2. 4Horsemen

    4Horsemen Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2010
    Messages:
    6,378
    Likes Received:
    81
    Trophy Points:
    0
    You are correct, they are Red. .

    Esau is progenitor of the Red people aka "White people". Another name for Easu is Edom which in Hebrew means Red.

    Esau.jpg

    But the OP is dead on point. We are commanded by GOD not to race mix. It's about the only thing the KKK got right.
     
  3. mikemikev

    mikemikev Banned

    Joined:
    May 6, 2012
    Messages:
    3,796
    Likes Received:
    34
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I don't need a source it's common knowledge. This is like asking for a source that 1 + 1 = 2 in a maths debate ie. embarrassing.

    Let me guide you a little, what color did chimps have when they lost their hair?
     
  4. 4Horsemen

    4Horsemen Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2010
    Messages:
    6,378
    Likes Received:
    81
    Trophy Points:
    0
    How ironic is it that we are taught that the "Red Man' was/is the Native American, but actually it's the "White Man" whose the "Red Man" because the Native Americans are Brown.
     
  5. mikemikev

    mikemikev Banned

    Joined:
    May 6, 2012
    Messages:
    3,796
    Likes Received:
    34
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Umm, no, the white man is not the red man. Thanks.
     
  6. 4Horsemen

    4Horsemen Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2010
    Messages:
    6,378
    Likes Received:
    81
    Trophy Points:
    0

    How do you separate people then, other than by sex??

    You can't be this clueless.
     
  7. l4zarus

    l4zarus Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2012
    Messages:
    886
    Likes Received:
    20
    Trophy Points:
    18
    It is NOT common knowledge lol. You KNOW most people (correctly)believe the opposite, which is why you're trolling the board saying dark skin evolved from pale skin. "Common Knowledge" is not science. Science might confirm it, but for that you need a source. YOUR SOURCE, SIR?

    No it is like asking someone asserting a scientific phenomena to SOURCE their assertion with back up research. YOUR SOURCE , SIR?

    Speculation is not a SOURCE. But to answer your question, probably med-pale grey or tan. It's NOT white/pale pink, if that's what you're trying to get at. And fur covered skin is lighter than it would be if it was exposed to sunlight, so you still lose.

    1: SOURCE YOUR ASSERTION DARK HUMAN SKIN EVOLVED FROM PALE HUMAN SKIN.
    2: THEN SOURCE HOW THIS IS COMMON KNOWLEDGE.

    Meanwhile I'll be ROTFLMAO. :D
     
  8. 4Horsemen

    4Horsemen Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2010
    Messages:
    6,378
    Likes Received:
    81
    Trophy Points:
    0
    You understand the Holy Bible. others are in need of mental fortitude. good job. I will jump in when you get tired of draggin' them thru the mud. I'm lovin' the Biblical spankin' you're puttin' down.
     
  9. 4Horsemen

    4Horsemen Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2010
    Messages:
    6,378
    Likes Received:
    81
    Trophy Points:
    0

    hahaha...classic.


    May I add that if anybody wants to see the descendants of Mogrel activity, look no further than the children of Lot aka Moab and Ammon aka China and Japan.

    the truth hurts. the Bible is too real for you to take. your eyes bleed from the recompence of GOD's word.


    POWAH!!!!!
     
  10. J0NAH

    J0NAH Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2011
    Messages:
    8,047
    Likes Received:
    18
    Trophy Points:
    0
    That'll be the real red man (european) trying to shed his identity. Apparently god didn't like Esau. So naturally europeans would try and pin that label on the native americans.
     
  11. 4Horsemen

    4Horsemen Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2010
    Messages:
    6,378
    Likes Received:
    81
    Trophy Points:
    0
    This fact in history will be Esau's undoing. His kingdoms are already crumbling around the world.

    GOD is good and the Bible is REAL.
     
  12. J0NAH

    J0NAH Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2011
    Messages:
    8,047
    Likes Received:
    18
    Trophy Points:
    0
    This forum is amazingly slow but yes, ever since I found out the truth in the bible it all began to make sense and is really quite an intriguing history.
     
  13. mikemikev

    mikemikev Banned

    Joined:
    May 6, 2012
    Messages:
    3,796
    Likes Received:
    34
    Trophy Points:
    0
    No, I don't need a source to demonstrate the obvious. The fact you even question this effectively slams your face into the ground at the first hurdle and I'm happy to leave it at that. Why don't you provide a source?
     
  14. l4zarus

    l4zarus Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2012
    Messages:
    886
    Likes Received:
    20
    Trophy Points:
    18
    YES YOU DO. Because the entire scientific community laughs in your face and your so called facts are NOT OBVIOUS.

    Extraordinary claims REQUIRE extraordinary proof.

    The fact pale skin developed from dark skin is well known: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_skin_color

    About 70,000–100,000 years ago some modern humans began to migrate away from the tropics to the north where they were exposed to less intense sunlight, possibly in part due to the need for greater use of clothing to protect against the colder climate. Under these conditions there was less photodestruction of folate and so the evolutionary pressure stopping lighter-skinned gene variants from surviving was reduced. In addition, lighter skin is able to generate more vitamin D (cholecalciferol) than darker skin so it would have represented a health benefit in reduced sunlight if there were limited sources of vitamin D.[3] Hence the leading hypothesis for the evolution of human skin color proposes that:

    From ~1.2 million years ago to less than 100,000 years ago, the ancestors of all people alive were dark-skinned Africans.
    As populations began to migrate, the evolutionary constraint keeping skin dark decreased proportionally to the distance North a population migrated, resulting in a range of skin tones within northern populations.
    At some point, northern populations experienced positive selection for lighter skin due to the increased production of vitamin D from sunlight and the genes for darker skin disappeared from these populations.

    The genetic mutations leading to light skin, though different among East Asians and Europeans,[25] suggest the two groups experienced a similar selective pressure due to settlement in northern latitudes.[5]


    PWNED

    It's somehow appropriate you're a Ron Paul supporter. How's that American Third Position racist alliance working out for Paul these days?

    LOL :D
     
  15. mikemikev

    mikemikev Banned

    Joined:
    May 6, 2012
    Messages:
    3,796
    Likes Received:
    34
    Trophy Points:
    0
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_skin_color

    My original claim was that dark skin evolved from white, which is true.

    If you go back to my response to Leftysergeant's lame irrelevant tangent about skin color, you'll find:

    http://www.politicalforum.com/race-...forbids-mongrelization-37.html#post1061491441

    The bold part is the important part.

    And Neanderthals were white (and blonde) at least 400,000 years ago. Heidelbergensis in Europe (an ancestor of humans) probably were too.

    BTW I love how you "pwned" me with some unsourced paragraphs from wikipedia. Look at the parts you quoted, they have no references. Probably written by some random lunatic.
     
  16. leftysergeant

    leftysergeant New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2012
    Messages:
    8,827
    Likes Received:
    60
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Hold it right there. Bonobos resemble humans more closely than do chimps, physiologically and behaviorally.

    They're black.

    PWNED!
     
  17. mikemikev

    mikemikev Banned

    Joined:
    May 6, 2012
    Messages:
    3,796
    Likes Received:
    34
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The only person "pwned" in this thread is you "pwning" yourself by going off on irrelevant tangents like this after losing the debate.
     
  18. mikemikev

    mikemikev Banned

    Joined:
    May 6, 2012
    Messages:
    3,796
    Likes Received:
    34
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Lose the debate. Check.
    Randomly and irrelevantly assert idaltu was "black" with no evidence as if that saves you from losing the debate. Check.
     
  19. 4Horsemen

    4Horsemen Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2010
    Messages:
    6,378
    Likes Received:
    81
    Trophy Points:
    0
    You're both wrong.

    White people come from the Albino gene of Esau. the progenitor of the White race. and let me correct myself and you all by not calling the white people "white" but "Red", which is their true color. It's written in the Bible.

    Genesis 25:25-28

    25 And the first came out red, all over like an hairy garment; and they called his name Esau.

    26 And after that came his brother out, and his hand took hold on Esau’s heel; and his name was called Jacob: and Isaac was threescore years old when she bare them.

    27 And the boys grew: and Esau was a cunning hunter, a man of the field; and Jacob was a plain man, dwelling in tents.

    28 And Isaac loved Esau, because he did eat of his venison: but Rebekah loved Jacob.
     
  20. 4Horsemen

    4Horsemen Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2010
    Messages:
    6,378
    Likes Received:
    81
    Trophy Points:
    0
  21. mikemikev

    mikemikev Banned

    Joined:
    May 6, 2012
    Messages:
    3,796
    Likes Received:
    34
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Don't be ridiculous. We don't even know what color they were. Nobody even cares except *******s. Only *******s go on and on about "skin color".
     
  22. 4Horsemen

    4Horsemen Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2010
    Messages:
    6,378
    Likes Received:
    81
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Truth don't lie. Red people didn't descend from Black people. no way, no how. they are of the albino gene of Esau.
     
  23. Libhater

    Libhater Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2010
    Messages:
    12,500
    Likes Received:
    2,486
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Correct me if I'm wrong horse, but methinks the red color that was prominent back in those daze was from the blood of the aftermath during the birthing routine. Some even had to wait to get dipped into the lake by John the Baptist before you could see their white skins. Check out the whining liberal baby in my avatar--even she looks to have a red glow to her and I don't think its because she has any Indian blood in her veins. Maybe its a snapshot of an earlier day in the life of Elizabeth Warren--you know, that horrid ex hippy femanazi reprobate that's running for senator from the state of Taxachusetts who claims to have Indian blood running through her veins.
     
  24. 4Horsemen

    4Horsemen Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2010
    Messages:
    6,378
    Likes Received:
    81
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The "red" petains to how Esau's blood could be seen through his skin. which is why people today call him the "White man" but he's actually Red. Also, hence the term "red necks" in the South. they WILL turn blood red if they stand in the sun too long.

    AND if you steal his Gillette Fusion for a month he'll look like a shag rug from head to toe..lol
     
  25. leftysergeant

    leftysergeant New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2012
    Messages:
    8,827
    Likes Received:
    60
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Horse feathers. You called H.idaltu white with no evidence. All indications are that whites originated in Europe with H. neanderthalensis. Everybody else in the paths by which H. idaltu could possibly have raidiated are some very dark color. Stop pulling stuff out of your butt and calling it the Holy Grail.

    The only white ape in Africa is the chimpanzee. The bonobo is black and is the only other critter that can copulate "in more homo," or "in more cano," or hanging from two different tree braches or whatever seems cool at the moment. Chimps can only do it "in more cano." Chimps are a dead end.
     

Share This Page