I cannot help but feel pity for this candidate. I spent some time watching the, woman's (?), face as she spoke. I am sorry but she just has the face that no matter how honest she tries to be and or is, it looks like she is fickle. Perhaps I am being rude, but I think she ought to come out of the transgender closet. I KNOW for a FACT I am not the only one who thinks this. She ought to seriously use that as an issue and speak out for the hundreds of thousands perhaps millions of transgenders, if she is. It shouldn't be an irrelevant issue. Transgenders face challenges, real actual challenges, even in the workplace and could use a political representation. Maybe it is still too soon for them. Instead all the GOP candidate attention is given to war, religion and opinions on the state America's politics. If she was going to be private about it, why didn't she dress plainly with no make up and not assume a gender at all? Dressing like a harlot will not get votes, isn't appealing and doesn't get what you say noticed and all that does get noticed is all the side effects in the skin that could be going on from medication along with the surgical alterations that can easily lead someone to assume transgender. She IS however a feminist. We do not need a feminist President. She talks too quick like she is on some kind of drug. Runs her mouth too hard about abortions. She wants any fight she can get, war on foreign soil, war against political parties, any conflict she can get. I think perhaps she has either alcoholic related dementia creeping up, or really some other neurological issue impacting her memory. She's been married twice. Is it early onset Alzheimer disease that she has? She has tried really hard to get seated somewhere political but has failed each time. SHe worked for fox for a little while, has done some charity, has tried to do some work with the cia and pentagon, in the cia just as a chairmen, the pentagon she was looking into staffing issues which could of been interior decoration. SHe hasn't the job history to sit in any political seat. On this radio show http://louderwithcrowder.com/carly-fiorina-uncensored-goes-full-honey-badger-on-sjw-feminists/ she mentions African Americans as without education, mentions men negatively, just watch it if you'd like and take a listen, if you can. She just ended her chances talking about how people such as men and blacks could lead good lives. She's pretty mentally ill sounding and looking, so paying attention is at your own discretion. I am disgusted, this radio show is an outrage.
I have no clue what you're talking about. I thought she handled herself very well. I also liked Governor Pataki. They'd be my two choices from the early debate. For the evening debate, my choices would be Carson, Christie, Rubio, Trump and Bush.
Based on what? Are you an FBI profiler? A woman that shows confidence is transgender? I'm a conservative, and viewpoints like yours hurt our cause. So a woman that wears makeup has no right to an opinion? Wearing makeup means one is dressing like a harlot? And for the rest I find it to be incoherent babble. Maybe you could expound on it? Feminism isn't what the hippies that haven't showered for a week (yes, I realize this is a broad generalization) portray it as. And in what way does she portray your idea of feminism? I'd be interested to read your credentials on the speech patterns of drug addicts.
I expected her to be more tech savvy, but the debate showed she did not know much about cyber security or the encryption debate going on, she just started rambling on like she knew... unfortunately.. that just proved beyond a doubt she did not .
lol. Did you even read the OP? Seventh post, you know. lol. I wouldn't bet money on it, but I'm pretty sure it's a joke. At any rate, it's damned funny. If the OP really feels that way, it's typical of a liberal, I guess. All hot air, no substance.
Jeez, that's an interesting possibility, and the first time I've heard it mentioned, if you meant it that way- Michelle for President.
The current immigration system is a function of the Progressive era: like eugenics, the welfare state, the draft, internment camps, etc. It's time for a return to the relatively free immigration the US enjoyed from its inception until 1921.
I think Fiorina talks about women too much. I think Obama talks about blacks too much. I think Megyn Kelly talks about women too much. In contrast, Cruz talked about what he would do, Dr. Carson talked about looking past skin color, Trump talked abut our sorry condition and sorry leaders.
[video=youtube;WbDqWZMOROE]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WbDqWZMOROE[/video] Watch her run roughshod over Matthews. He really couldn't fight back or look like he was beating up on the girl. We need to remember that for the General Election. [video=youtube;Z2ezdQyMsEE]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z2ezdQyMsEE[/video] And refusing to be bullied by reporters.
Fiorina has a handle on the issues and understands them well. We need to forget her gender and stop bringing it up. She took on Matthews because he is a liberal political hack who ignores the facts. Anyone who is current on issues can make Matthews look like a buffoon. Take away Matthews ideology and all you got left is an empty suit.
