House GOP report details testimony that contradicted key Jan. 6 witness

LINK: House GOP report details testimony that contradicted key Jan. 6 witness (msn.com)

Its quite evident that the J6 Committee left out exculpatory evidence that they KNEW that they had. This just shows how politically motivated they were to push a narrative and shows that they didn't actually care about the facts.

Furthermore, it was the DHS that pushed to keep these transcripts out of the public eye. Further showing that the DHS has become weaponized against Trump.

What other facts are they trying to keep hidden? Does anyone on the left side of the aisle dare to go against the narrative and actually question their leaders?

 

He also confirmed Trump authorized 10k NGuard.

 

Yeah, I read about that but never got to make a thread on it. Got a link for it? I won't mind adding it to this thread as more evidence that the J6 committee never actually cared about the truth.

 

Cliff Notes:

Cassidy Hutchenson gave half a dozen interviews to the J6 Committee behind closed doors. During her last interview, she gave a story she allegedly heard from a Secret Service agent that Trump assaulted the driver of his vehicle, grabbing him by the neck and demanding to be taken by someone else on January 6th. The Committee interviewed the agent, who swore under oath that he never told her that story and had no idea how she came up with it. The first time he heard anything like it was when she told the story. They also interviewed the driver, who again swore under oath that he had no idea what she was talking about and said Trump never lunged at the front of the vehicle or grabbed him. That didn't matter; they put her on national television to tell the story and pretend it was true. Multiple people were interviewed who said her story was a lie, and they either didn't preserve the transcripts or didn't index them, apparently hoping they would never be found.

Interestingly, when they interviewed the agent, they never asked him to confirm their star witness's allegation, seemingly knowing it was a lie. But his attorney brought it up on his own because he wanted to make sure his client was on the record disputing her story and not part of her perjury. They didn't care and pushed her narrative, making her the face of hearing. She claims she didn't witness it, but the person she claims told her said she was lying. The people who were allegedly present when she was told have refuted her. The people in the vehicle with Trump when it allegedly occurred, including the driver himself, have all sworn under oath that she was lying.

There are literally 80 concise pages of this Committee's failures. This is only one of them.

Proof Cheney and the Committee knew she was lying:

 

The Jan 6th investigation was nothing but a biased political sham.

 

page 78
https://cha.house.gov/_cache/files/...AA2E4D00C62DE8F036EE90481BC8EE2.ornato-ti.pdf

https://cha.house.gov/2024/3/chairm...released-anthony-ornato-transcribed-interview
https://thefederalist.com/2024/03/0...g-evidence-of-trumps-push-for-national-guard/

 

Yes, but while the Thompson/Cheney Committee was suborning perjury, they were also meeting with state and federal prosecutors giving them their one-sided "evidence" to prosecute their political adversary during the election.

 

It has all been re-established by the people in the room at the time..
Meadows, Patel, Trump, Miller, and records show Milley was also involved in that conversation...
Miller went "two faced" in front of the J6 committee, and then backpedaled real quick the other way when he was confronted a second time by the same committee revealing his interview with Hannity... then he sung a different tune...

 

The J6 Committee was so corrupt that some of them may face criminal prosecution:

House May Refer Members of January 6 Committee for Prosecution.


Will be frog-marched?

'House Oversight Committee chairman Rep. Barry Loudermilk (R-Ga.) announced this week that the House may refer members of the partisan January 6 Committee to the Department of Justice for alleged misconduct involving document concealment and destruction.'

The corrupt 'Committee disposed of documents and records despite being warned by then-incoming Speaker of the House Rep. Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) to preserve all records. This news comes in the wake of a House report that found that the Democrat-led committee withheld exculpatory evidence about Trump from the public.'

“There's still documents that we need to get hold of. We still don't have passwords for the encrypted documents,”

Bring them in, order then to produce the passwords, and then hold them in the House Jail until they cough it up.