How Holyweird primes and poisons Americans.

Don't be.

I provide a valuable social service, hoovering up the Kosher lies, and confronting them with truth.

It's not about being 'the one', of course not.

One of many.

Remember, published opinion is not real public opinion.

 

Here's an extremely interesting related piece for those interested:

http://www.globalresearch.ca/oscar-...are-the-pentagon-and-the-israel-lobby/5324333

 

This might be the most moonbatty OP evar...

 

By providing what their customers want.

I seem to recall a thread that was started about how the food industry isn't poisoning their customers or cheating them because they are giving them what they want. Funny how the same people who say the food industry isn't doing anything wrong, attack Hollywood for doing the exact same thing.

Things that make you scratch your head, and wonder where sanity has gone.

 

I worked in the advertising industry for 15yrs.

Television and print media.

Your assumption is flawed.

Fatally flawed.

 

Marketing to give people what they think they want is just as effective as giving them what they want. How can that be flawed since selling a product/idea is the entire purpose of propaganda (AKA advertising)?

 

Because I can create a need, and a want.

Which is not the same as a real demand.

 

If people want something, doesn't that create a demand, by default?

 

True but the premise is to sell, and either way they, the customer, buys.

 

Yes it does, but it is manipulative and a false demand.

If I flood a city with opium, and use films to make it seem exciting, I am creating a false demand, and a corrosive one.

 

Yes that is true, but it is what they are buying into, and it's wider implications that are damaging.

It's hard to explain, as I am trying to explain it from what was an inside position, it is a psychology, a science.

 

Politics usually is, and that is all that marketing is. Trying to sway people either into believing something they wouldn't ordinarily, or believe something that otherwise doesn't make any sense.

 

Politics has become advertising, and psychology is in there too.

I had to study NLP as part of my training, and that gave me an incredible insight into it, that changed my view forever, as well as working in the industry.

I read a book a week, the best one I have read in recent times was Gustave Le Bon's 'Study of a popular mind'.

What you are seeing in Holywood is little more than hate propaganda, of that I assure you, 100%.

 

This Cohen is is simply a good example of it.

And focus on what I said in my OP.

**

To the same end, imagine if you will, if several films were released globally, by a gentile owned Holywood, and among the titles and themes a few short years, were the 'comical' look at (let me think), oh, yes, would they laugh and like it if the theme of the comedy was centered around allegations against Jews kidnapping Christian children? Would they like the 'witty' impression that would leave, on the watcher?

Perhaps we could have a blockbuster, that a three hour epic of all the massacres that Jews have carried out, since invading their stolen landspace, and the lies of their religous claims.

How would that sit? Or rather than another attack on the Church, such as in V, how about a film in which the central charachter is a paedo Rabbi instead? How would that sound? How would it the be if such films were shown to a wordwide audience, over and over and over?

Nice? Good? Hate disguised as cinema?

The latter? Do not be a hypocrite then.

 

Of course it is. It's psychological programming , just like the evening news, especially the entertainment news sources. The difference is not all movies and TV shows are, but everything on the news is designed to manipulate and sway the public. EVERYTHING!

 

Well there you go, it is a psy op to programme what you think, and how you react, in essence, right?

And a bit more on top..

[video=youtube;mWwidH1Et6s]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mWwidH1Et6s&list=WLB71F37C497E5CC42&feature=player_detailpage[/video]

 

Well people are social animals and they will do just about anything to be accepted by the pack, even when it isn't in their best interest to do so. It is a sad scenario, but reality at its finest.

 

Ah, but who herds the pack you see...

And a pack are cattle, are they not?

See?

[video=youtube;TYIh4MkcfJA]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TYIh4MkcfJA&feature=player_detailpage[/video]

 

Whenever I want the best movie reviews, I always check with the Iranian government first.

They're really hip and cutting-edge.

 

Came in here expecting something about how Hollywood is trying to brainwash people but instead found the standard "Jews are bad" shlock.

Perhaps this thread belongs in the conspiracy section.

 

Argo snubbed the Canadianism and the British but it mentioned (*)(*)(*)(*) that was done to Iran didn't seem to involve Israelis

and only the guy who actually went to Iran rely looked good as in the story every one else backs out of the mission

 

I usually stray away from new movies strictly beeecause 95% of them suck and hhhhaise my blood pressure, but today I made an exception to the rule. Of course, it had to be some cheese, this one called "Flight" with Denzel Washington. Now, I may not have understood the politics of this flick, but I definitely understood some of its physics. For starters, a big heavy carrier like this with no lift (or with a downward lift present instead) on the wings, would not stay upside down for more than 5 seconds, before going nose down into the ground, no matter how skilled the pilot, and here the ordeal lasted for at least a whopping minute. But for the sake of heroism, and we do need heroes, let's assume this was one of those magical planes which would compensate for any limitations the pilot may have had. Even then, the way the plane crashed into the ground at the angle and speed that was shown, the fuselage would go tumbling sideways round and round and round. So then you would have 200 casualties and only 6 survivors rather than the other way around. But even if this was the case, in hindsight it could have been all 206 casualties if not for the skill of the pilot. So the question is, should saving those 6 lives get the pilot off the hook despite tests coming back showing he was drunk when flying? The answer is, yes, if it carried mostly the NASCAR organizers, or if it was a D.C. to Chicago or a D.C. to Crawford, Texas flight. And since there is little genuine humour packed into the Hollywood productions these days, my jokes equally suffer.

 

I don't know why people laugh at Sasha's movies. I felt embarrassed when Borat came along, like America was really doing a disservice to Kazakhstan. I felt like we owed them an apology, or at least Sasha did. Also, what he did was also similar in a way to what Fargo did by marginalising and making fun of Minnesota.

I don't think either of these films, nor their makers, are part of any conspiracy, however. I see them as clueless Hollyweird grass f*ckers making fun of the rest of the world, including people in their own nation, who are obviously all beneath them.