If You Really Believe Diversity Is A Strength...

...why don't you endorse it for all the countries that don't tolerate it?

You know... China, Japan, Korea, India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Nigeria, Liberia, Ethiopia, Somalia, Ghana, Uganda, Kenya, Ivory Coast, Sierra Leone, Guinea-Bassau, Congo, Namibia, Cameroon... infact, just about every single other non-White nation on the planet?

Why don't you liberals criticize those racists for not embracing the wonders of multi-culturalism?

Come to think of it, I wonder why they don't embrace multi-culturalism? Maybe it's because multi-culturalism is as unnatural as buffalo wanting to live near lions and tigers.

 

The prime minister of England came out at said that multiculturalism is a failure. Of course the lefty scum howled him down for it though. It stupid to think all races can live together happily, its just not how we humans are. Leave the blacks and their crime away from me....

 

That's what freedom, law and justice is all about.


Endorse it everywhere.

 

I think diversity in race and culture is something to be tolerated if it's already there, although not explicitly encouraged.

I wouldn't go as far as to say that it's a "strength". It's actually been more of a weakness most of the time.

 

Well it has to start from somewhere. Let's force it on them like we had it forced on us even though they don't want it, yes? That seems like fun.

I'm glad you admitted the part I highlighted. You seem to be one of the more reasonable anti-racists on this site.

 

I'm anti-bigotry.

 

Fair enough.

I'm anti-violence, anti-murder, anti-rape, anti-crime, anti-uncivilized behavior, anti-ignorance and anti-drugs personally. Kind of explains why I'm a racist really.

 

I'm sorry to tell you this, but black people do not have a monopoly on those things, and neither do Hispanics. "They" have a crime problem today, that is true. But one only has to look at the hundreds of years of bloody wars and genocides committed by white people to see how ridiculous it is to think that Hispanics and blacks are the only "savages". I'm sorry if I'm "anti-white" for noticing.

 

The most diverse country in the world is also the most powerful country in the history of the world.

How could you not say that our diversity isn't a strength?

 

Of course blacks don't have a monopoly on all those things, but they certainly top the charts on all those things DESPITE being a minority of only 13%.

THAT I find unacceptable and I refuse to tolerate it.

As for Whites waging bloody wars and committing genocides. Yes, you're anti-White for pointing that out. What you fail to realize is that black Africans wage new bloody wars and genocides practically every month. What makes Whites so special?

We're not talking about bloody wars or genocides anyway, I'm against stuff like that as much as the next man. Probably even moreso. We certainly wouldn't be indulging in any of that unnecessary evil under a White-Nationalist government. What we're talking about here is creating as close to a civilized society as humanly possible... and that means without blacks. Blacks are not needed, nor wanted and they can certainly survive on their own back in Africa where they truly belong. There's no reason for them to continue their genocide against the human populations of America.

 

Are you saying that Black people aren't humans?

 

Within ten minutes drive of where I now sit there are several Christian churches, one mosque, seven or eight Sikh temples, a Hindu temple and a huge synagogue. In my building there are many whites, two Iranians, four Chinese, one black and a Pollock, me.

The non white population of this city is around 40%. The people who supply me with materials are Chinese, the people who fix my equipment are Japanese, half of my customers are Asian and the guy who drove me home tonight is a Sikh complete with long beard and turban. I speak Mandarin and Cantonese and know how to swear in French, Polish and Spanish.

I am proud to be a part of a quiet example and proof that mutli-culturalism does work.

There has never been a race riot in Canada, we riot over hockey.

And for the record, buffalo do not chose to live near lions, lions chose to go where the food is.

 

Yes, actually, I am.

http://erectuswalksamongst.us/

 

Are you really this dumb?

Blacks can interbreed with white people with no complications. Hell, there's entire continents full of black/white offspring which are extremely fertile and have explosive population growth rates. That means that they're the same species. If blacks were a modern form of Homo Erectus (i.e. a different species) that wouldn't be possible.

 

Utter drivel.

 

I live in a very multi-cultural place at the moment. Here we have literally every nationality on the planet. As such I am surrounded by these people every single day and get to observe all their different characteristics and quirks. It's funny, but practically every nationality you mentioned are the ones I have grown to consider nice, decent, civilized human beings too. Sikhs, Pols, Chinese, Japanese, the ones I've met have been lovely people. I'm not against lovely people.

Try meeting some Somalians, Nigerians, Zimbabweans, Ghanians, Jamaicans, or even some Pakistanis... and I don't mean one or two either. Try meeting thousands like I have. We'll see if you're still singing the multi-cultural tune then.

I've heard Canadian anti-racists argue against racism before and they all sound like you. No offense, but I don't think Canada has experienced real multi-culturalism yet. I've never heard of a no-go zone for Whites in an all-black ghetto in Canada like there is in real multi-cultural countries.

Yeah, that was kind of my point there...

 

Are YOU really this dumb?

Read the book and then get back to me. Otherwise you're ignorant having only heard one side of the story.

The neanderthal gene has been found in all human species except blacks.

Same as above.

 

Except science backs up the fact that two seperate species cannot consistently produce viable offspring. That renders that entire book void.

Neanderthals were homo sapiens.

 

How does it follow from that "They aren't humans"? There are obviously genetic differences between races created from evolution but it seems to me to be a pretty big leap to claim that they "aren't human". How is it possible for them to breed with other races then if they aren't the same species?

 

No it doesn't. There's always exceptions to the rule.

And blacks are homo erectus.

 

Racial, ethnic and other differences are fine. However, the political ideology of multi-culturalism is divisive and has significantly weakened the sense of shared consciousness and identity necessary for the American people to be successful.

 

Well on your last point I will disagree staunchly. We don't have white 'no go zones" BECAUSE multi-culteralism works here.

As to sounding like other Canadians, well, that proves we're all on the same page. I don't know about them, but I have traveled a good deal of this globe, including 44 states. And yes I have lived and visited in areas where whites are the minority and, yes, there have been times when I felt threatened. But that is in that country, never here.

Frankly, there some white areas in the US I consider "no go zones', and I have experienced intense hatred for Canadians just south of me. At the same time I am embarrassed by the anti-American sentiment in this country, especially since I am one.

So it goes.

 

Please, provide an example of two seperate species creating a viable, fertile population numbering in the hundreds of millions. Again, there's entire continents full of mulattos, and they have higher population growth rates than almost every other group on the planet.

 

Like freedom of religion? A multiculturalistic idea that has allowed the U.S. to avoid the religious conflicts that have engulfed Europe repeatedly in the same time span?

 

No.

"...The term ‘multiculturalism’ emerged in the 1960s in Anglophone countries in relation to the cultural needs of non-European migrants. It now means the political accommodation by the state and/or a dominant group of all minority cultures defined first and foremost by reference to race or ethnicity; and more controversially, by reference to nationality, aboriginality, or religion, the latter being groups that tend to make larger claims and so tend to resist having their claims reduced to those of immigrants.

The ethnic assertiveness associated with multiculturalism has been part of a wider current of ‘identity’ politics which has transformed the idea of equality as sameness to equality as difference. Black power, feminist, and gay pride movements challenged the ideal of equality as assimilation and contended that a positive self-definition of group difference was more liberatory. The rejection of the idea that political concepts such as equality and citizenship can be colour-blind and culture-neutral, the argument that ethnicity and culture cannot be confined to some so-called private sphere but shape political and opportunity structures in all societies, is one of the most fundamental claims made by multiculturalism and the politics of difference. It is the basis for the conclusion that allegedly ‘neutral’ liberal democracies are part of hegemonic cultures that systematically de-ethnicize or marginalize minorities. Hence, the claim that minority cultures, norms, and symbols have as much right as their hegemonic counterparts to state provision and to be in the public space, to be ‘recognized’ as groups and not just as culturally neutered individuals..."

Read more: http://www.answers.com/topic/multiculturalism#ixzz1adG95ban


Edit: What is the greatest, largest and oldest continuous racial/identity group in human history? Han Chinese. Do you know why?