Is it something of concern?

I
believe
ZPG
is
what
she
was
referring
to
!!!!!!!

ZPG is the METHOD of reducing population. To me, THAT IS WHAT SHE SAID/MEANT.

DEAL WITH IT!

And if you come back now with “zero point gravity” again, I’ll just end this by ignoring you hereafter.

 

Bullshit!

When she says

How is it that she uses 3 different things to make it a better place by adding AND REDUCED THE POPULATION?
WTF DOES THE LATTER HAVE TO DO WITH ENERGY?
IT DOESN'T.

IF YOU PUT ME ON IGNORE, IT'S BECAUSE YOU'RE AVOIDING THE FACT AND DON'T WANT TO FACE IT.

 

You’re moving the goalposts now.

And in the first place, I’ve never seen a video of her saying this in context. What are you hiding?

 

No, I haven't. Never have.

I told you straight up from the beginning when I posted that video of KH's speel and how she mentioned very clearly that population reduction was on the cards. And that it was NOT part of clean energy bullshit. It was its own goal to be achieved. If there were any smoke and mirrors or that the goalposts have been moved, it's you had created it or moved them.

If it's in regarding the last statement about ignoring, that is a fact, not a goalpost.

 

Read the rest of my last post and attempt a reply.

 

That’s right. It doesn’t. She saw “pollution” and mistakenly said “population”. So you’re right: what she SAID (“reduce population”) has nothing to do with energy policy. She goofed and you’re insisting on lynching her for it instead of searching it out like I did. https://www.factcheck.org/2023/07/social-media-posts-misrepresent-kamala-harris-error/

 

We know she's dumb as dogshit, but don't make excuses for her. She said what she said, and meant it. Fact-checking, yeah and of course, they too are covering for her. Everyone that thinks the latter, needs to admit, she said what she said and meant it, there's no denying it. Pollution, yeah right. You know that when people are under a lot of mental strain (just her taking a breath is) and pressure, the subconscious mind mixes with the conscious. Things are said and or done that are supposed to be locked up in the subconscious mind, but surfaces from time to time. This is called a Freudian Slip.

So is saying population a mistake of saying pollution? No, but fact-checking will tell you otherwise to cover up her word salad. It wasn't a misinterpretation, as she doesn't skip a beat and she doesn't behave as if she made a boo-boo. It was fluent and articulated.

 

What context is needed? She prattles on about...

"Think about the impact on public health, when we invest in clean energy and electric vehicles and reduce population more of our children can breathe cleaner air and drink clean water." [verbatum]

So when she puts public health first, then energy and the reduction of the population!!! Hmm, Public health + population reduction.

 

As expected, this opportunity to lynch her is just too good for you to face corrections and to get over it. Nobody but righties said it was a “Freudian slip”. It ws a case of READING too quickly and superficially as she sped along.

 

She's a stupid frightened scared shitless idiot. She cannot put a coherent sentence together without creating word salad, and she's going to take over the reins once Biden is off the perch? Good luck with that.
It is but a mere observation of the obvious, not an attack.

"Reading too quickly"?! At what point in the video do you see her look down at any notes to read from? She was speaking off the cuff.

As it was also pointed out, this is a subject the leftists talk about whether overtly or inadvertently. Which one did she choose to use?

 

@Kode
WTF is she on?????

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/DXyvqCRq4CY

I have no clue what that means, other than she is an idiot who is a master of tossing word salad. "Think about what that means."

 

More absurdity...

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/kmSS7zG1Bx8

 

This off-topic swill has become quite the hate-fest.

 

It seems someone who thinks it is, gives it that sentiment. Funny how the truth does care about feelings.

Hmm, I wonder who began the hating?

Strange don't you think how this is in the 'political issues' section?

How is it hate speech, when she demonstrates what is observed and noted?

 

Yeah, it’s true. Republicans and righties don’t understand what’s hate speech and what’s not. Thanks for the reminder.

 

The inventors of it, the left. So anyone that points out the obvious or questions their morality and ethics it's classed as racial and uses hate speech. Yeah, I know how it works.