JFK was attempting to duplicate Lincoln policy that had saved taxpayers $4 billion

Are you claiming the Fed didn't "process" the bonuses along with the bailout monies?

 

show me where the federal reserves processed any bonuses

 

Here it is in an abstract, overview, kind of way;

It should be self-evident that if our federal Congress "processed" a bailout that included multimillion dollar bonuses, the Fed must have followed through with monetary policy to "process" the same.

 

do you think everyone is as stupid as you are?

there's nothing in that link showing that the federal reserve processed any bonuses

 

What part of this is so difficult to understand?

 

people embarrass and humiliate themselves when ignoring reality that the bankers wanted kennedy out of the way because of his printing of united states notes.Ignoring facts that Johnson stopped the printing of them one day after his assassination.

why they like to be sore losers and too arrogant to admit when they have lost is whats sad about it all.

this is where they fail miserably everytime.this link cant be debunked.they show they they cant accept defeat everytime they try and get around it.

http://www.michaeljournal.org/lincolnkennedy.htm

 

What was the price of silver during that time frame?

 

you really have to be a crazy idiot to think that means the federal reserve is responsible for banks paying multimillion dollar bonuses

here's the fed's policy again

“Compensation practices at some banking organizations have led to misaligned incentives and excessive risk-taking, contributing to bank losses and financial instability.” — Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke, October 22, 2009

http://research.stlouisfed.org/pageone-economics/uploads/newsletter/2010/201002.pdf


The Federal Reserve Board under Chairman Ben S. Bernanke is taking steps to ensure that the incentive compensation policies of banks and bank holding companies do not undermine the safety and soundness of those institutions. We also welcome the Fed's solicitation of additional recommendations on enhancing transparency beyond the proposal.

http://www.federalreserve.gov/SECRS/2009/December/20091214/OP-1374/OP-1374_112509_25301_531488789799_1.pdf[/QUOTE]

the fact is that your conspiracy bs has been debunked many times

Kennedy wrote executive order 11110 to phase out silver certificate currency, not to issue more of it. Records show Kennedy and the Federal Reserve were almost always in agreement on policy matters. He even signed legislation to give the Fed more authority to issue currency.

http://hidhist.wordpress.com/banksters/debunking-the-federal-reserve-conspiracy-theories-and-other-financial-myths


E.O. 11110 delegated to the Secretary of the Treasury the President's authority to issue silver certificates under the Thomas Amendment of the Agricultural Adjustment Act, as amended by the Gold Reserve Act. The order allowed the Secretary to issue silver certificates, if any were needed, during the transition period under President Kennedy's plan to eliminate silver certificates.

E.O. 11110 was not reversed by President Lyndon B. Johnson and the section added to E.O. 10289 remained on the books until President Ronald Reagan issued Executive Order 12608 on September 9, 1987…

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Executive_Order_11110

 

Have you considered that it may be a simple reading comprehension issue on your part; or do you believe multimillion dollar bonuses are not part of the money supply?

 

either show me where the federal reserve paid multimillion dollar bonuses

or admit you're a liar

 

It should be self-evident that the bonuses, as part of the money supply, must have been processed by the Fed along with bailout monies.

Are you now making a wild claim that the bonuses were not part of the money supply in our economy?

 

of course you couldn't show me where the federal reserve paid any multimillion dollar bonuses, they didn't pay any

that's pure stupidity

stop being such an idiot

you remind me of those nut case birthers



no wonder nobody with a brain takes you idiots seriously

 

Did you know that non sequiturs are usually considered fallacies?

 

stop trying obfuscate the lies you've been posting and tell the truth

the federal reserve didn't pay any multimillion dollar bonuses

 

As a mostly autonomous organ of the executive branch, the Fed must have "processed" that "increase in the money supply" to comply with a Congressional directive regarding fiscal policy for the United States.

 

we've already been through this before

you couldn't show me where the federal reserve processed any multimillion dollar bonuses

your argument has been 100% refuted

 

You can't show the Fed didn't process the bonuses along with bailout when "controlling our money supply"; and we know some of those bailed out CEOs got multimillion dollars bonuses. Are you claiming they got their bonuses in some manner external to the money supply of the United States?

 

stop being looney, the burden of proof is all yours

not from the federal reserve

what a completely looney question, are you in a mental hospital or something?

 

Are you claiming they got their bonuses in some manner external to the money supply of the United States? If not, then my assertion must be correct because the monetary authority must have been controlling the supply of money according to laws enacted as fiscal policy by our federal Congress.

It is only your lack of understanding between public Firms and private Firms that, apparently, leads you to your red herring line of reasoning.

 

oh please nut case, i have an advanced degree in economics

it's you who has little understanding of how the fed works and what it does

you keep making claims, but then can't back those claims up with any valid evidence

you're either a dumb kid with little education, a nut case that has little to no grip on reality or maybe both

 

non sequiturs are usually considered fallacies (for your Cause).

Are you claiming they got their bonuses in some manner external to the money supply of the United States? If not, then my assertion must be correct because the monetary authority must have been controlling the supply of money according to laws enacted as fiscal policy by our federal Congress.

 

with all the nut case malarkey you guys post

it's no wonder you guys are such miserable losers

 

fallacies are worse.

 

i haven't post any fallacies

and your lies are reprehensible

 

non sequiturs are usually considered fallacies.

Are you claiming they got their bonuses in some manner external to the money supply of the United States? If not, then my assertion must be correct because the monetary authority must have been controlling the supply of money according to laws enacted as fiscal policy by our federal Congress.

There is a difference between macroeconomics and microeconomics.