Judge Gives Trump Final Warning: Jail Is Next

He was found liable for millions of dollars both for cause and damages. He's never been convicted of a crime, but that could be changing.

 

Twelve jurors all agreed he was guilty. I am not OK with a president that treats women with blatant disrespect, like they’re some kind of sex toy.

 

How is it a kangaroo court to give the defendant the same right that prosecutors enjoy? If anything and we hadn’t thought of it until now the defendant is unfairly burdened with defending themselves with not a lot of options.

If the prosecution can undermine the reputation of the defendant then the defendant should also be able to undermine the reputation of the prosecution. Fair is fair

 

Yeah. They think there is a 50.1% chance he did it. He was not found guilty. Guilt is not an outcome of a civil trial.

 

Give me some citations establishing that the Prosecutor has disparaged Humpty****.

 

It is accurate though to say he is an adjudicated rapist

 

Yes, at a minimum, they thought 50.1%. For all you know, it truly may have been 100%, zero doubt.

 

The exact same charge could be leveled at MAGA fans. Because the justice system is, in this case, acting against "your side", you see it as corrupt. (Mind you, MAGAts could hardly complain about the very friendly favors being afforded The Stain by people like Cannon, the judge in Georgia and the USSC at the moment...no complaints of corruption there...? And even the multiple warnings given out by this judge re the gag order are waaaaay more generous than if you or I were on trial...)

So, the only alternative seems to me to allow the system to play out. You may not be happy with the result, but that happens for one "side" or the other in most court cases...there are winners and losers most times. And the system allows you an out if you're still not satisfied...there are appeal courts that can review the decision/s.

 

Is it "fair" for witnesses to be intimidated or coerced...? How about jurors...?

 

Nonsense. One of the alleged violations was a post saying Pecker, a witness was a nice guy. Several posts said nothing and merely duplicated posts from others, One he stated most all of the jurors are democrats. None of them "menacing" in any way.

 

You mean like Cohen being threatened with prosecutions for more serious crimes if he doesnt agree to plead guilty to lesser crimes and agree to testify against Trump? Yeah, that sucks. Injustice disguised as justice.

How are they intimidated or coerced by Trump pointing out they are most all democrats?

 

Ok instead of takin Faux News word for it how about you actually quote some facts

 

Wasn’t that under the Trump administration???

 

???? You havent yet read all the posts and statements claimed to be a violation? Such strong opinions regarding matters you know nothing about.

 

Now try some truth…what would have happened to you or me, or any other defendant, if we’d directed the comments and gesticulations towards jury members that he has…? Would we have survived 10 separate warnings before being thrown in a cell…?

 

Yes it was.

 

Absolutely nothing.
"That jury was picked so fast -- 95 percent Democrats,"

 

With your 50.1% claim, you are equating that to ‘beyond reasonable doubt”. Correct? I’m sure some of the jurors were much more certain than that - maybe even 100%. New York civil trials require that 5/6 of the jurors must be in agreement for a verdict, however CNN reported that this trial required a unanimous verdict.

 

Oh, that’s all he said and did…?? 10 times over…??

 

Meh. That wasn’t determined either.

 

Well yes. It’s a civil trial after all and that’s all it takes to lose. They just have to believe there was a 50.1% chance he did it.

 

NOT SO. But that is an example of the mindset issue for the left- invert the logic and blame the people you are attacking for objecting to being attacked.
If you can't see past the snow job and see what they are doing- Sorry for you, because in time you too will be the victim of that gullibility. These people have no morals, there rules are- whatever we can get by with. They are setting precedents and will try to make this shenanigan something tolerated by the people. Weak people will allow that, and we have a growing percentage of weak people who can't think for themselves.

The law is only a just instrument when those who administrate it are just people. When they are not, it becomes a weapon- against anyone they choose to use it on.

 

Then, you will not be OK with most of the presidents in history, of any nation. Leadership and being a milktoast nice guy are not mutually compatible characteristics. Leaders are power people, and powerful people attract women- and not just good ones. Goes with the territory.

 

I’m “OK” with Biden in this regard.

 

The whole point is that Trump hasn't been convicted of a crime. At last you agree.