Kayleigh McEnany runs through voting allegations in 234 pages of affidavits

I will make a prediction.

Less than 1,000 votes will be affected and Biden WINS.

 

Looking at the existing vote margin and distribution I believe the recount will indicate Trump wins GA.

 

And I believe you are mistaken.... 250 votes either way...

 

So long as no one looks too hard.

 

And I predict it will make no difference anyway

 

Ga, Az gov's and election commissions are that incompetent to let the Dems in their state run the entire show?

They should not be in office if they are so incompetent.

 

Lolwut?

NO Chance. None.

The margin is too great.

 

Plenty of poll watchers and monitors are recruited and observed right in the work areas.

Officials from Republican Party as well as Dems are included in ALL of the counting and tabulating in every district.

The Trump-addled screamers are claiming that the Trumpies from these hordes (probably Qanon) protestors should be allowed to jam into with the voting officials (who are BOTH of parties, Republican and Democrat) already monitoring the process!

Are ALL of the Republican party leaders in EACH STATE were corrupted by the MSM? Which includes Fox News, Wall Street Journal, and dozens of other MSM sources?

These claims by Trump and his minons are insane!

 

So I did some digging through the data. First thing you should be aware of is the data is not from the USPS. This is from the the PA Department of the State. Which makes sense as how would USPS know anything about party registration of the applicant?

It is curious to note that quite a lot of the examples in your screenshots are returned either the day after application, or the same day of application. You cite these as an impossibility. However, checking the PA laws regarding returning of absentee mail ballots, they support both drop boxes and hand delivering as a return method: https://www.votespa.com/Voting-in-PA/Pages/Mail-and-Absentee-Ballot.aspx#return

Beyond that, PA also offered early in person voting (via filling out an absentee mail ballot in person) this election cycle: https://www.pa.gov/guides/voting-and-elections/#EarlyIn-personVoting

Digging through the data itself, of the 34,915 ballots coming up as being delivered the same day as mailed out, 15,837 were also the case where the application was approved the same day or the previous day. I suspect the most likely explanation for these is either early in person votes, or people with unusually quick mail using dropboxes / hand delivering.

Some interesting notes about the data set:

- A little over 9K entries with no date for when the ballot was mailed, but do have a return date. These may also point to early in person entries, but without knowing how data was entered, it is not possible to judge.
- There are 597 entries with an earlier application approval date than requested. At least one is an obvious input issue with an approval date of 02/13/2021, and return date of 02/13/2020. Overall these seem abnormal.



- There are some 23,305 entries with an earlier ballot return date than the mail date. Adding an additional filter to this query to also verify if any of these same ballots were marked as application approved after being returned yields only 6 results. My guess would be this likely points to delayed input for ballot mailed date - although it is impossible to truly know that from just staring at the data.
- Among the 6 aforementioned results, they each have matching application approval and return dates - just with a ballot return date specified 1 day prior. This seems more likely a data input issue.



Overall, the data definitely has some unusual entries. I suspect a lot of what you pointed out may be explained with early in person (by absentee mail ballot) votes, or dropboxes. But other cases where the application was marked as approved before the application was returned, or where the ballot was marked returned before it was mailed, probably do deserve a closer look.

 

234.... remember that number.... when all is said and done, subtract the wins and that is how many times Trump lost

 

I guess what these trump supporters believe, is the Republicans working the polls and count certifications are total incompetents.
The Republican people hired and voted to make the rules/laws/and governance of the entire State voting laws are also incompetents. If so many Republicans are so incompetent, why ever elect or hire someone who is that incompetent?

 

I need to find it again, but there's a Twitter feed that's going over the affidavits one by one. So far I haven't seen any from anyone who claims to have actually witnessed voter fraud.

Some of the affidavits from people who say that they just *felt* like too many of the volunteers were liberal or that they saw people wearing BLM shirts and masks.

 

But dont that go hand and hand with the GOP stupidity factor?....Remember the family values party?...Remember lock her up, and having the power of the house, senate, and white house? Benghazi?....They just lie and their fans believe!.....They are a joke, useless, spinless, and inept....Should be their new platform for 2024!

 

At this point in time, I can NOT argue with that.

According to tRUMP and supporters, Republicans elected to offices, people republicans hire to sit on election commissions and polling stations are total incompetents.

They are cutting their own throats with the incompetent republican claims. Because if there is that wide spread fraud, never ever proven, by them, then the people on the republican side failed horribly. And in some Republican controlled states like Ga, Az.

The Ga governor was the head of the election process 2 yrs ago, before he became gov. Did he allow a complete destruction of his processes and policies in just 2 yrs?

 

Allegations. Allegations. Hmm, what is the definition of that word? And did she run through any corroborating evidence? I mean, I can allege all sorts of things. Can I prove them? Nah. No one is worried. At least, not about Biden losing. I'm worried at how far from reality so many Trump supporters live, but that's not a new worry.