Kobach: Texas Case Challenges Election Directly at Supreme Court

Discussion in 'Current Events' started by camp_steveo, Dec 8, 2020.

  1. camp_steveo

    camp_steveo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2008
    Messages:
    23,014
    Likes Received:
    6,601
    Trophy Points:
    113
    https://www.breitbart.com/politics/...hallenges-election-directly-at-supreme-court/

    States can bring a case directly to the SCOTUS and Texas has done so. The article explains that TX is suing GA, MI, WI, and PA, claiming the states violated the USC by changing election laws by means other than through the legislative bodies.

     
  2. Vote4Future

    Vote4Future Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2008
    Messages:
    6,988
    Likes Received:
    3,558
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Simple question or two. Isn't it too late? What happens if the Supreme Court upholds the complaint, say on December 20th? Again, isn't it too late?

    This is absolutely the strongest argument on our national election failures! There are localities in these states that did their own things passing changes outside of their state laws.
     
  3. camp_steveo

    camp_steveo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2008
    Messages:
    23,014
    Likes Received:
    6,601
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I don't believe the 'safe harbor' date means anything if there is a current legal challenge. The only Constitutional date is Jan 20th when Trump's 1st term officially ends.
     
  4. MissingMayor

    MissingMayor Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2018
    Messages:
    7,845
    Likes Received:
    5,495
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Texas has zero standing as an injured party. This is beyond stupid.
     
  5. LoneStarGal

    LoneStarGal Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2019
    Messages:
    15,050
    Likes Received:
    18,807
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Interesting. The Supreme Court definitely needs to step in and settle a few election issues on constitutional clarity, at minimum before any other major elections take place. Tons of lawsuits are being filed against this year's election. Some do and some don't have much to do with this "wasted" election, which is tainted with irregularities in select states.

    If the S.C. were to hear this suit, it not only clears up election legislation for future election standards, but it also seeks redress for the 2020 vote.

    Remedies requested in this particular suit:

    upload_2020-12-8_7-34-53.png
    upload_2020-12-8_7-37-0.png



    The suit concludes:


    upload_2020-12-8_7-40-2.png
    upload_2020-12-8_7-40-39.png

    https://www.scribd.com/document/487348469/TX-v-State-Motion-2020-12-07-FINAL#from_embed
     
  6. LoneStarGal

    LoneStarGal Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2019
    Messages:
    15,050
    Likes Received:
    18,807
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Did you read the filing? :)
     
  7. LoneStarGal

    LoneStarGal Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2019
    Messages:
    15,050
    Likes Received:
    18,807
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The suit addresses your questions. Everyone should skim through the actual filing.


    upload_2020-12-8_7-44-46.png
    upload_2020-12-8_7-45-13.png
     
  8. Yulee

    Yulee Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2016
    Messages:
    10,342
    Likes Received:
    6,383
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I did.

    It’s going to be tossed so fast your head will spin.
     
  9. Junkieturtle

    Junkieturtle Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2012
    Messages:
    16,044
    Likes Received:
    7,568
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Seems like the time to have sued over mail-in voting was before the vote took place. Absolutely dirty politics to wait until afterwards and only do it because the result of the election wasn't what you wanted.
     
    FreshAir, PARTIZAN1, Marcotic and 6 others like this.
  10. James California

    James California Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2019
    Messages:
    11,343
    Likes Received:
    11,478
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    ~ This sounds similar to Bush vs Gore in Florida. The Supreme Court got involved in that issue. Same thing is likely to happen again.
    As they say : " Don't mess with Texas ."
     
  11. StillBlue

    StillBlue Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2016
    Messages:
    13,304
    Likes Received:
    14,901
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No, it won't. It will not even get far enough to be tossed.
     
    fiddlerdave, TomFitz, bx4 and 4 others like this.
  12. Yulee

    Yulee Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2016
    Messages:
    10,342
    Likes Received:
    6,383
    Trophy Points:
    113
    That is highly probable too!
     
    Cubed, fiddlerdave, bx4 and 2 others like this.
  13. Daniel Light

    Daniel Light Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2015
    Messages:
    31,455
    Likes Received:
    34,888
    Trophy Points:
    113
    And the Court said, "Time to stop with the recounts and lawsuits and accept the results".
     
    fiddlerdave, TomFitz, bx4 and 4 others like this.
  14. LoneStarGal

    LoneStarGal Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2019
    Messages:
    15,050
    Likes Received:
    18,807
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Your crystal ball must work better than mine. Mine hasn't predicted the future since I was 8 or 10 years old. Even then, it was wrong most of the time.

    [​IMG]
     
  15. Egoboy

    Egoboy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2017
    Messages:
    44,763
    Likes Received:
    32,099
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    The Supreme Court technically has to get involved to refuse to consider this nonsense...
     
  16. LoneStarGal

    LoneStarGal Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2019
    Messages:
    15,050
    Likes Received:
    18,807
    Trophy Points:
    113
    This is not the only challenge. As I mentioned earlier, many complaints are asking the Court to clarify some of these issues for future elections, if not this one. Seems like people should be able to at least agree that the S.C. needs to clarify rules around our election laws, so we don't start a bad precedent with election integrity questions at every election.

    I thought that this thread was going to be about the Amicus Brief that Ted Cruz and several others filed yesterday on an existing S.C. election decision. Turns out, the Texas filing is separate and covers other issues.

    upload_2020-12-8_8-11-4.png

    Looking at the Supreme Court docket for Brnovich v. DNC, there have been multiple briefs filed from April 27 - December 7 by multiple parties. Cruz's and other Senators filing yesterday is just one of many asking the S.C. for clarification on the Voting Rights Act.

    Link provided. The list is much to long to screenshot here.

    upload_2020-12-8_8-9-27.png

    https://www.supremecourt.gov/docket/docketfiles/html/public/19-1257.html
     
    Last edited: Dec 8, 2020
  17. StillBlue

    StillBlue Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2016
    Messages:
    13,304
    Likes Received:
    14,901
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The only thing is has to do is acknowledge that it received the request. No requirement to give it a hearing.
     
  18. cd8ed

    cd8ed Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2011
    Messages:
    42,210
    Likes Received:
    33,142
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    So it seems the new argument isn’t that fraud occurred but that the people were allowed to vote incorrectly.

    At least y’all are getting to the point that the goal is to disenfranchise voters.
     
    Cubed, bigfella, TomFitz and 7 others like this.
  19. James California

    James California Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2019
    Messages:
    11,343
    Likes Received:
    11,478
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    ~ Only the ones who cheat - or are deceased .
     
  20. camp_steveo

    camp_steveo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2008
    Messages:
    23,014
    Likes Received:
    6,601
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yes it does.
     
  21. MissingMayor

    MissingMayor Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2018
    Messages:
    7,845
    Likes Received:
    5,495
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Wake us when you find a few actual votes from dead people. The only one I heard about was that guy who filled out his dead mother's ballot for Trump.
     
  22. Daniel Light

    Daniel Light Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2015
    Messages:
    31,455
    Likes Received:
    34,888
    Trophy Points:
    113
    That's not what these lawsuits are asking - they are asking to nullify millions of legal votes and shift the election to State Legislators.
     
    bx4, WalterSobchak and Derideo_Te like this.
  23. camp_steveo

    camp_steveo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2008
    Messages:
    23,014
    Likes Received:
    6,601
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The result of unconstitutionally changing laws is exactly that, but the voters in states that followed the Constitution are the ones being disenfranchised.
     
  24. Egoboy

    Egoboy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2017
    Messages:
    44,763
    Likes Received:
    32,099
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    No, of course not.... They have to receive the request and they have to deny a hearing, so as I said, the SCOTUS will get involved...

    I think the irony is that there are few states in the US where it's harder to vote than Texas, having them challenging states that made it easier to vote during a pandemic...

    Awesome!
     
    MissingMayor and Derideo_Te like this.
  25. camp_steveo

    camp_steveo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2008
    Messages:
    23,014
    Likes Received:
    6,601
    Trophy Points:
    113
    'legal' votes that prior to unconstitutional actions by the defendant states were not legal votes.
     

Share This Page