Liberals use political correctness as de facto censorship.

Planned Parenthood Founder and Feminist Icon Margaret Sanger also attended a KKK rally.

 

On the internet I have not found any confirmation that Professor J. Philippe Rushton ever attended KKK meatings.

In his book Race Evolution and Behavior, which I review here,

http://politicalforum.com/index.php...avior-by-professor-j-philippe-rushton.611548/

Professor Rushton acknowledged that East Asians tend to be more intelligent than whites, and that they have lower rates of crime and illegitimacy.

 

But Professor J. Philippe Rushton never did.

 

Talk about Crazy, there are people who want Asians removed from being classified as minorities when in 2011 only 5% of the United states population were Asians while black people comprised 12.6% of the population and Latinos 17.8% of the population.

I guess I'm confused.

what exactly is the definition of a minority???

 

the splc states he is the president of a hate group? You support this man, really?

White supremacy is still popular in USA?

It's really fringe in UK, borderline non existent.


Rushton had spoken on eugenics several times at conferences of the American Renaissance magazine, a monthly white supremacist magazine, in which he had also published a number of general articles.[84]

 

Sanger spoke to a group connected to the KKK — called the Women of the Ku Klux Klan, which she described it in her 1938 autobiography as a willingness to talk to anyone in order to advocate for birth control.
Yet another reason why the right should love her.

 

You said "He attended kkk meetings". You going to just walk away from that claim. And SPLC has become a tool of the left.

As defined by CRT? It is everywhere. As defined by the KKK? Almost absent except in the mind of some racist individuals.

 

"Max Horkheimer first defined critical theory (German: Kritische Theorie) in his 1937 essay "Traditional and Critical Theory", as a social theory oriented toward critiquing and changing society as a whole, in contrast to traditional theory oriented only toward understanding or explaining it. "

Their theories have nothing to do with an honest examination of reality and instead seek to change that reality.

 

It seems you would need an honest examination of society in order to critique it.

 

They need a dishonest examination to bring about the changes to society they seek to achieve. Everything has to be perceived as the oppressor verses the oppressed. And the only solution is government power to eliminate that oppression.

"Marcuse also analyzes the integration of the industrial working class into capitalist society and new forms of capitalist stabilization, thus questioning the Marxian postulates of the revolutionary proletariat and the inevitability of capitalist crisis. In contrast to orthodox Marxism,
Marcuse champions non-integrated forces of minorities, outsiders, and radical intelligentsia, attempting to nourish oppositional thought and behavior through promoting radical thinking and opposition. "
One-Dimensional Man - Wikipedia

The intelligentsia is a status class composed of the university-educated people of a society who engage in the complex mental labours by which they critique, shape, and lead in the politics, policies, and culture of their society;[1]
Intelligentsia - Wikipedia

Thus their need to be able to look you dead in the eye, swear to you that it is raining, as they pee on your leg.

 

So a dishonest examination would result in an error filled critique which leads to suggestions of social changes that will not work in reality. All according to plan? Okay.

 

So you're just going to ignore his intimate association with known white supremacist organisations?

You're really playing the white privilege card on me?

 

It will if perfect racial equity is the goal and you have a government willing to mandate such equity.

 

First it was that he was an "avowed white supremacist", then is was that he attended KKK meetings, and now its "his intimate association with known white supremacist organisations".
Ive asked for evience for any of these things. I'll take a look at whatever evidence you have for ANY of these things. Seems the problem with Rushton is the same as the problem with Charles Murray. They point out very real racial differences and the left has a big problem with that. Same as their problem with pointing out very real differences between men and women. Critical theory assumes that we are all equal SOOOOO any race or sexual disparity can only be the result of racism or sexism. Really stupid assumption to begin with.

 

What very real race difference has this well known white supremacist pointed out exactly? We are all intrigued to know what it is you believe in.

 

Racial differences in IQ test results seems to upset the left the most. I believe in them. You can use a standardized math test made up of nothing other than mathematical equations to solve and find the same racial disparity.

 

You believe that is due to melanin content rather than education?

 

White supremacist organizations are not responsible for high rates of black poverty and incarceration. They do not force most blacks to perform poorly in school and to have many illegitimate children that whites are expected to support on welfare. They do not force many blacks to commit crimes.

 

Yes they are. It's called the police force and government, the largest white supremacist organisations in USA.

It works both ways. I'll state that the black community and white community are at fault for the black community predicament.

But you insist it's no fault of white supremacy and racism as if unarmed black males can be murdered with impunity by the government overseers

 

You can find the same racial disparity within a single school providing the same education to all of its students regardless of color. And no, I see no causal link between melanin content and IQ. That seems to be a purely geographical evolutionary adaptation.

 

So therefore you agree there is no correlation between race and iq.

Thanks for clarifying that.

No more to see here.

 

Actually the police murder with impunity more white people than black. And then there is the statistics that show blacks are more likely to be involved in violent crime and so are more likely to be involved in violent police interactions.

 

That's because there are way more white ppl.

 

What you perceive in your post modernist world as clarity, is in fact your confusion as to the difference between causation and correlation.

 

So you agree there is no correlation between race and iq?