This thread is about a thread and poll already posted which has illogical results. This long post is made necessary by the lack of accountability of posters here. http://www.politicalforum.com/opini...assure-info-vital-life-shared-understood.html That thread and poll are about a vital structure of social instinct and reason intrinsic to human survival and evolution. Essentially communication and its purpose. The social issue this thread is about is a covert infiltration into internet forums which uses cognitive distortion by deceptively modeling the distortions as functional within the exchanges of false, infiltrating social groups with a shared agenda. The larger group which is infiltrated, over time, experiences a dynamic escalation of; distraction, confusion and distortion, which induces it to give up on reasoning amongst themselves as the covert groups agenda begins to socially blend with it in seemingly consensually harmonious reason, which is not reason at all. This is shown in the thread here. http://www.politicalforum.com/opini...assure-info-vital-life-shared-understood.html That thread does not state that the purpose defined is the only purpose, it states it is the root purpose of free speech. There are of course infinite purposes, but the thread is not about that fact, it is about the relation of communication to survival. Nearly all posts ignore that fact and espouse other uses related to the root purpose. Basically applications of the root purpose. The infiltration has been at this level since 2008 in the political area and reasoning is now fairly rare between more than perhaps 4 people who are discussing issues the infiltration of the covert group is targeting with; distraction, thread dilution, ridicule and distortion in the creation of confusion. Emotional reasoning is a big tool. An entire area of cognitive distortion is exploited by cognitive infiltration to utilize the creation of attitude in the targeted group. (*)Attitudes control perceptions. (*) http://healthadmin.jbpub.com/borkowski/chapter3.pdf ATTITUDES What is an attitude? Allport (1935) defined an attitude as a mental or neural state of readiness, organized through experience, exerting a directive or dynamic influence on the individual’s response to all objects and situations to which it is related. A simpler definition of attitude is a mind set or a tendency to act in a particular way due to both an individual’s experience and temperament. This ability to create attitudes on the web is greatly enhanced by the fact we are using the written word because there are some facts about our intuitive and cognitive functions that pivot on whether information is spoken or written. (*)Here is a link to describe the scientific basis for this. http://truthasaur.tripod.com/twominds1.html What can be inferred from the link, is that words spoken or heard are always processed cognitively to some degree, whereas those read or written might not be. (*)I find it curious that a science fiction writer compiled that medical info of the link rather than psychology but DID NOT make the inference I've made, which is obvious. (*)There are other indicators that psychology is afraid to verify aspects of potentials of human mental performance. So, it is not surprising that this critical fact is not shared widely or . . . at all. What that fact of the left and right hemispheres major dedications does is makes cognitive distortions very difficult to sort out, particularly WHEN social factors are involved, in the medium of WRITING and reading. Here is a list of cognitive distortions that the infiltrators put to use. This list was created by cognitive therapists for use with individuals that inadvertently conduct these forms of thought, thusly sabotaging their perceptions and expectations. However the same effects, albeit mostly with less impact, can be induced by covertly imposing these forms of communication, once converted to social exchange, upon an unsuspecting group then pretending that they are clear concise, relevant expressions. COGNITIVE DISTORTIONS 1. All or nothing thinking: Things are placed in black or white categories. If things are less than perfect self is viewed as failure. 2. Over generalization: Single event is viewed as continuous failure. 3. Mental filter: Details in life (positive or negative) are amplified in importance while opposite is rejected. 4. Minimizing: Perceiving one or opposite experiences (positive or negative) as absolute and maintaining singularity of belief to one or the other. 5. Mind reading: One absolutely concludes that others are reacting positively or negatively without investigating reality. 6. Fortune Telling: Based on previous 5 distortions, anticipation of negative or positive outcome of situations is established 7. Catastrophizing: Exaggerated importance of self's failures and others successes. 8. Emotional reasoning: One feels as though emotional state IS reality of situation. 9. "Should" statements: Self imposed rules about behavior creating guilt at self inability to adhere and anger at others in their inability to conform to self's rules. 10. Labeling: Instead of understanding errors over generalization is applied. 11. Personalization: Thinking that the actions or statements of others are a reaction to you. 12. Entitlement: Believing that you deserve things you have not earned. Now, please understand that there is yet one more factor to consider. A dynamic campaign that began in about 1980 using semiotics, to surreptitiously integrate cognitive distortions into the American language practices. http://www.uvm.edu/~tstreete/semiotics_and_ads/terminology.html This was mostly done with television media. Accordingly if you were were born after 1980 and watched a lot of TV, you got a major dose of this through; sitcoms, soap operas, game shows, reality shows, dramas, action adventure etc. It was integrated nearly everywhere, sometimes just as a matter of mimicry. Humans are incessant mimics, logically, cognitive infiltration is most effective if it can induce mimicry. If you are someone that has been posting on forums and getting social without a deeply cognitive focus, it is very likely you may have unconsciously assimilated perceptual patterns promoted by cognitive infiltration. The infiltrating group makes false agreements about the expressed distortion as if they were actually real, clear coherent relevant terms, but they are not. By using this method in specific topical design, an unsuspecting group that is infiltrated can be made to change their attitudes, then beliefs and expectations in surprisingly radical ways. That is what has happened in politics over 14 years, since 911 when the infiltrations ramped up in all areas of activism, but particularly since BO to office. Accordingly, a simple instinctual agreement such as the purpose of free speech; being that information vital to survival be shared and understood; cannot be understood and accepted. Now, there could be other causes for the poll responses here. http://www.politicalforum.com/opini...assure-info-vital-life-shared-understood.html The people responding to the poll might not be the ones posting in the thread. No one posting explains a deeper, more fundamental purpose for free speech, because it is not possible that there is one. Sure there are an infinite number of purposes, uses, dedications etc. But none matter if survival is not secured. So they all come later. Another possibility is that the people responding and posting are so overtaken with cognitive distortion, that they cannot actually accept the straight forward definitions of purpose I've provided redundantly in response to comments. A final possibility is that there is a software malfunction. Not likely, but possible. This entire premise of free speech originates with an ancient Indigenous American doctrine about "The Greater Meaning Of Free Speech". Now the thread enters into philosophy, but properly so because law came from philosophy. The Constitution for the united states of America is based on philosophical understandings that came after the Magna Carta and those learned from the Six Nations Iroquois Confederacy from about 1742 onwards. Chief Canastanago impressed Franklin rightly in 1744, and Franklins influence spurred Jefferson and Washington to work towards something stronger and more finite than the Articles of Confederation. The Greater Meaning Of Free Speech has been removed from written history, but you will see that it is obviously a missing 70% that merges with the 30% of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness of the the Declaration of Independence from 1776. The Greater Meaning Of Free Speech is created from an understanding in the hearts and minds of people who practice it. From that understanding can come; forgiveness, tolerance, acceptance, respect, trust, friendship and love, protecting life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. These principles are of the human psyche, human beings are the ones that benefit from this instinctually consistent natural law. So the meaning inspires cooperation and organization towards survival and discourages conflict, which is for the most part is a waste of energy. My focus is to revise the 1st Amendment to include The Greater Meaning Of Free Speech, because they enable human beings to preserve the principles of the constitution with all of their rights and freedoms and thereby end the abridging of fee speech completely. If you want to criticize this plan, I have a requirement before I will accept such. You must show me- Which mother or father in this nation will ignore or pass up the real opportunity to assure their child will grow into a nation that holds high and honors understanding that can create; forgiveness, tolerance, acceptance, respect, trust, friendship and love, protecting their life, their liberty and their pursuit of happiness? This issue of communication is an absolute that breaks down to biology, after the veracity of social psychology. Accordingly, there is NO WAY the poll response of that thread is real. Heads up people, try critical thinking - we are looking at 80% cognitive infiltration where it matters most, exactly where it would be expected by the NWO IF it did matter that much. AND it does. Accordingly, when a concept counters the NWO agenda, cognitive infiltrators must oppose it. In the cases of discussion about the root purpose of free speech to human beings as natural law, opposing it can BACKFIRE. So logically infiltrators try to find some other information from a poster that can be used to marginalize their social status. Here is an example of exactly that. http://www.politicalforum.com/showthread.php?t=370271&page=5&p=1064196573#post1064196573 It is very unlikely that a cognitive infiltrator will bring any information of a real threat to the NWO agenda, usurpation of the constitution, into discussion unless it is complaint based sensation that is not intrinsic to the agenda of systemic tyranny. Critical thinking applied to understanding the agenda and modus operandi limits of the cognitive infiltration is actually not difficult. It does require some use of absolutes which the over all psyops on America has made obscure. Basically if strategy that can effectively oppose the agenda is presented, the infiltration must oppose it. They must oppose to the point of losing credibility even. These are not ordinary individuals and that sacrifice is a planned level of operation. However, they, up to a point, cannot compromise the covert infiltration by becoming too obvious over a number of infiltrators where they might be observed. One method that avoids that compromise is for the group pretending they do not understand, in the hopes that the sincere viewers will somehow mimic the position as an assumption. Here is an unusual example where an infiltrator refuses to accept that I agree with them. http://www.politicalforum.com/showthread.php?t=357763&page=5&p=1064166102#post1064166102 Again. reasoning could be so fouled that the poster could be sincere but mimicking cognitive infiltrators. This is WHY agreement on the root purpose of free speech is so important. Cognitive infiltrators cannot participate in unity. It is absolutely against their agenda. If sincere Americans simply use common reasoning, and accept assurance of survival of a group that needs to organize and coordinate for survival is the ultimate purpose of the mutually respected right to free speech. Or, when someone claims with reasonable evidence and substance that survival of the group is an issue, that their speech be given priority until the threat is dismissed or overcome by effective group action. Speech is free and a right, but that doesn't mean that any speech is allowed over that which preserves the lives of those recognizing the right. The right of free speech is there for a specific purpose, it of course has many other purposes which come after the prime purpose. Just because we have not seen conditions in our recent past where such a situation manifests as this type of cognitive infiltration, does not mean it cannot or is not manifesting.
IOW, welcome to the world of Fox News and MSNBC. Of Limbaugh and Sharpton and the infinite number of talking heads speaking to specific agendas. I believe that frank luntz (a genius I happen to admire) has done far more than goebels in advancing the art of political propaganda and opinion shaping of the masses. And roger ailes (a genius I happen to despise) has shown everyone how it is done.
Agreed, but this thread is not about the media icons of manipulation that assail us daily, its about a minute by minute exchange. It is about the tens of thousands of cognitive infiltrators that populate the web in covert gropis that everyone thinks are sincere Americans but are the perfect opposite. The thread is about a strategy to separate ourselves as sincere Americans using constitutional intent which the insincere cannot accept because it defeats their, the NWO agenda by enabling the unity of Americans needed to preserve their constitution. It explain how the sincere got to the pint where they almost cannot know the difference between the unconscious sense of their republic they gained from their parents and what makes sense of the millions of soldiers that sacrificed themselves to preserve something that they did not quite understand with comprehensive perspective but loved deeply because they knew the human species depended on the purity of the principles therein.
This forum didn't have enough activity to keep me busy and present a challenge so I went looking for a forum with some greater traffic. In the back of my mind I thought this thread might be a good place to document some actual cognitive infiltration worked up in a busier forum. I should note for users and admins that cognitive infiltrators (coginfils) are so numerous that they can literally make a forum appear busy. They do this because the public likes active forums. So, the coginfils actually create traffic, which they then proceed to mislead with their collective manipulation. In this forum I started 5 threads. I did this because I saw definite signs of collusive covert social groups working to block prime constitutional intent from being understood. Two threads have been locked I can tell the forum admins are aware of the infiltration and allow it, and there is good evidence they are working with the infiltrators to limit any compromises to the overall agenda someone like myself might cause. I can see that going on with two posts in two widely separated threads. The first was a post in the first thread I was posting in. The thread was called, "is there such a thing as a practical anarchy". The post was an answer to a challenge to produce evidence showing England took over the American government after the civil war. I found a lot of circumstantial evidence that encircled the fact and posted it. The other posts were a series about the missing book from 1962, the "Hundtedth a Monkey". Someone posted that they had a copy in .pdf form. A 1974 book by the same name covers the earlier book in history. That is how important the 1962 book was to get rid of. The 1974 book marginalized the science of the 1962 book. My position in the first thread I posted in was that the lawful and peaceful Revolution I know is empowered by Article V also could power the transition of America into a truly practical anarchy. Such is fully lawful and possible IF Americans deem that the constitution intended for them to use the republic to better themselves to the point where they were completely independent and fully constitutional in every way WITHOUT any government regulation. Government became a redundant, anachronism that was a waste of time and energy. Such is actually possible if we REALLY have our act together. We are currently a long, long ways from anything like that today. When I found anarchists resisting that possibility I knew I found pretenders, covert agents pretending to be edgy anarchists. Keep in mind there are one or two posting in opposition to the purpose of free speech that might not be a part of the covert group knowingly, but rather are simply going along with false social group to fit in. It is also possible that central figures are MKultra victims riding a wave of post hypnotic conditional instructions acting as crude tools for others who know what they are doing. Basically handlers for the controlled coginfils. I'm going to break the link so admins there cannot follow it back here and perhaps spare this forum a rash of coginfils. My intent here is to educate not create a series of Internet forum skirmishes. Copy and paste the the broken URL into a text document and add http:// to the beginning and take out the 2 periods before .com. Then paste it into a browser to go to a thread where things are getting quite interesting. forum.grasscity...com/politics/1331108-sensation-vs-solution-what-does-nwo-want.html/page-23#entry20913111 There are a few sincere posters that drop in occasionally to offer some support, so it's not like they cannot see the covert agenda unrolling. However, it's not likely they know how to handle themselves fully in the battle so it's just enough to let me know they see what is happening and make the coginfils very nervous about actually getting very well exposed. Any here who understand how the purpose of free speech is indeed constitutional intent are fully welcome to join in and support that. You can do so and ignore the coginfils, I will interact with you. I recommend joining and posting a half dozen times in odd threads to be incognito, more effective that way. It is a forum about marijuana located in the Netherlands, so the admins have no reason to protect American interests
A new article about covert agents cognitively infiltrating for purposes of manipulating users on the internet came out in January, within some months Glen Greenwald wrote this article. https://firstlook.org/theintercept/2014/02/24/jtrig-manipulation/ Here are some of the screenshots from the power point presentation that was part of Snowdens disclosure. A basic program description. List of operations. This chart has some techniques that covert agents are trained to use. Mirroring was one I recognized back in 2006 as being obviously manipulative and insincere. This chart identifies repetition as a tactic. This one identifies tactics of fracturing social cohesion. The logo for the jtrig program. An insect. Insects have colonies, the queen is the ruler. Uk intelligence headquarters is responsible gchq.gov
