Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Sees Apollo Landing Sites

Then when you link to something you want people to watch, you should probably link somewhere they can watch it FOR FREE. Not somewhere they have to buy it...

What's that supposed to mean? You feel obligated to flog conspiracy DVD's at Amazon?

 

Even calling those disjointed rantings a "theory" is giving them far too much credit.

 

What evidence?? People who so much as entertain the notion of those missions having been faked are obviously unaware of the overwhelming amount of evidence for the authenticiy of the missions (and of the absurdity of the entire notion to begin with).

I mean, good grief! We're to believe that the smart, honest engineers at NASA who work hard and proudly to send hardware into space and carry out scientific research there are actually busy photoshopping thousands of photographs, which they would have to be doing to provide us with LRO imagery of the Apollo landing sites, and that they're contently maintaining a 40-year-old lie that was never even possible to tell and get away with in the first place?

Get a grip on reality! Hoax believers and those who even consider the claims are not living in reality, and they are basing their beliefs much more on ignorance + emotion than they are on facts.

 

Ok ok. Calm down... I didn't say it was faked, I said it is at least possible they faked it.



(it's like blowing on an ant hill)

 

And I say it isn't possible, based on information that I feel you must either be lacking or ignoring. Faking it all would have been a LOT harder than simply going, and probably downright impossible, because of all the people and R&D involved, not to mention that people were able to pick up transmissions between the Apollo crews and Houston by directing their dishes and antennae at the moon...

 

Ok fine... calm down. sheesh.

 

I can be as calm as you need me to be. It's only text, after all

 

He wants you to be calm and ignore the fact he cannot respond to your refutation of his claims. :Lol:

 

The moon landings have been shown to be hoaxes.The radiation in the van Allen belts would have been fatal.Solar flares couldn't be planned for since they are not predicatable.The Apollo Guidance Computer was far too primitive to guide the LM to the surface of the moon.The photographs and videos have fatal anomalies.

 

No,No and no...


We went to the moon.

End of story.

 

It must be nice living in such a simplistic world..... Funny how you think the Apollo guidance computer wasn't good enough. I am a programmer by trade, and I've looked into the Apollo guidance computer. It was more than capable of the calculations needed. Are you some kind of computer expert where you can make that claim? Or are you completely ignorant of what it would take and are just hoping and praying nobody calls you on your ignorance?

 

The proof that the missions were faked is so clear that the only thing you pro-Apollo people can do to actually sway the viewers is try to bury it deep in the thread to keep them from seeing it.
http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showpost.php?p=4001964&postcount=1

We can thwart you by reposting it from time to time.

 

Keep up those fantasies, Scott. The proof your bull(*)(*)(*)(*) is anything BUT clear is the FACT you can't seem to convince a single person that you are actually correct. How do you explain your complete and total failure? Oh right. You lie your ass off and hope nobody notices. Thanks for the laughs, Scott.

 

http://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/

^ The Apollo Lunar Surface Journal. Zounds of photographs, video clips and loads of other data are freely available there for browsing.

 

...and it was all filmed in a studio.

 

Naw. I don't think so.