MAGA 2020 Memes <<MODERATOR'S WARNING>>

Oh, wow. Joking about rape. I guess you think rape is funny when it happens to people you don't like. Oh, and it looks like you got a few likes from some fellow progressives on this forum. Ladies and gents (no non-binaries), I give you the progressives. Progressive much like how cancer progresses.

 

I still can't get over how amazing this was:

 

Not joking about rape, but joking about jail bi men.

 

I personally find irony humorous. TFG was found liable in the Carroll case, so yes, rape in his case does have a certain amount of humor directly proportional to the number of p*****s he grabbed.

 

@Sallyally, were you joking about rape? @Imnotreallyhere appears to be suggesting that you were, and they found that funny, and you liked his post. But you said you weren't joking about rape. So, you were or weren't joking about the raping of political opponents? Or you were joking about the raping of political opponents? Or were you not joking about the raping of political opponents, but you like others enjoying a joke about the raping of political opponents?

Such twisted principles, it would appear.

Anyway, to something that is actually funny:

 

No.
Weren’t.
Werent.
Weren’t.
You introduced rape, not @Imnotreallyhere or I.
Yes, Trump has always been a joke.

 

You like this post:

You also asked where's Trump's "boyfriend, Bubba," which is in reference to rape against male prisoners.

But then when it is pointed out that you are joking about rape and liking posts in which rape is funny against people with whom you disagree politically, you seem to act stupid, as if you don't know what I am clearly pointing out.

 

You also asked where's Trump's "boyfriend, Bubba," which is in reference to rape against male prisoners.

“You also asked where's Trump's "boyfriend, Bubba," which is in reference to rape against male prisoners.” You inferred that meaning referred to rape.
did you miss where I mentioned jail bi men?
I enjoy irony. Unfortunate that Trump’s history of rape was linked with your understanding that same sex relationships in jail are rape.

 

You used the term "Bubba," which is a well-known reference to a prisoner who rapes other prisoners. In fact, in the book Encyclopedia of Rape and Sexual Violence, the author notes, "A number of films include depictions of prison rape. More often than not, however, popular culture trivializes prison rape. Films and television often reference cellmates named 'Bubba.'" That exactly describes what you were doing. You were trivializing prison rape, because, in this context, it would be rape against someone with whom you disagree politically. When you were called out on it, you pretended that you were referring to same-sex consensual partners, even though the term Bubba does not reference such relationships. Again, you specifically used that term, which has well-known connotations with rape. Furthermore, you have no evidence that Trump is bisexual, which is further evidence that such a relationship would not be consensual--i.e., rape. Lastly, you liked a post of a poster who thought the rape of Donald Trump would be funny. All this evidence lines up to you thinking the raping of people with whom you disagree is funny. The fact that you have other progressives who like these posts of yours, I think, says volumes about what progressivism is.

I know you're not going to admit that you were joking about people with whom you politically disagree getting rape, but I think anyone with half a brain reading this conversation through an unbiased, nonpartisan lens knows exactly what you were doing.

 

Since you mentioned me, I thought I'd throw two cents in here. TFG was held liable for sexual abuse, bragged about 'grabbing other women by their genitalia, and going into locker rooms full of naked underage teens. It would be ironic if something similar were to happen to him. Irony is a for of humor, but one that does not induce laughter..Bubba and TFG would not be humorous because of TFG's beliefs. It would be humorous because of his immoral,verging on the criminal, acts. Anyone with half a brain and a grasp of the context can see you're making a mighty mountain of outrage out of a molehill of a two-sentence appreciation of irony.

The Soviets used to accuse the West of being decadent. You appear to be doing the same thing, accusing a person and by your own admission people who agree with them politically of some kind of moral failing because of their sense of humor. I don't thin any of the great religions has a Comandment that says "Thou shalt not laugh", so proof is kind of thin on the ground. As you profess to dislike the Soviets while using their methods and maintaining their attitudes, I can only conclude you come from the opposite end of the political spectrum. That's where the Fascists live, in case you didn't know.

 

A side advantage to T**** in prison. With an SS presence required for him 24/7 the prison could save money on guards pay.

 

You, sir, must be unfamiliar with the workings of bureaucracy. Budgets go up, never down.

 

I appreciate your honesty in that you find humor in people with whom you disagree politically being raped, although I find your rationalization morally bankrupt. I was going to say that @Sallyally would like your post that goes into more detail about why you find your politically opponents being raped humorous, but she was too fast for me: she liked it before I could say anything. That's how much she agrees with your logic. Outstandingly sick.

 

Anyway, enough wasting time, back to the funny:

 

As I said before, it is not humorous because I disagree with his politics. It it humorous because of his actions, which are tantamount to rape. Poetic justice is ironic. Irony is a form of humor which is not really funny - at least no one I know laughs at it.

Further, humor is a matter of taste, not morals. I find your conflation of the two kinda dumb and brownshirty.

[quoteI was going to say that @Sallyally would like your post that goes into more detail about why you find your politically opponents being raped humorous, but she was too fast for me: she liked it before I could say anything. That's how much she agrees with your logic. Outstandingly sick.[/QUOTE]

And again, the humor is not in the politics, but in the poetic justice. Also and again,humor is a matter of taste, not morals, not politics. Not even mental health,as implied by your last sentence. I think you're being self righteous and vain in assuming your sense of humor is the only morally correct one and demanding everyone toe your line.

 

It would not be too much of a stretch for those who want to jail their political opponents and are actively taking steps to do so would also be in favor of wanting those political opponents to be raped. It follows logically, seeing as prison rape is real. Speaking of fascism, that is fascism: jailing your political opponents, which can lead to rape. Pure projection.

 

Didn't TFG supporters chant "lock her up," quite a bit in 2016 for essentially mishandling classified documents?

Jailing criminals for their crimes regardless of their political opinion is justice, not fascism. Dictating what art can be displayed or ,for example, what people can laugh at is totalitarianism.While you profess to despise totalitarians, your opinion of Sallyalley's joke, your conflation of morality and taste and you turning the matter into a political issue point to you being one. I do not say you're a bad person, I say you are confused about your political beliefs and mine. I say that you don't have a real idea of the differences between political belief, morality and taste. If you want to call others out on these things, you might want to get a little education.

 

Did Donald J. Trump lock her up? He had 4 years to lock her up, and he never did. I remember Democrats used to bitch and moan about Trump supporters saying lock her up. These are the same people cheering the Trump indictments. Actions speak louder than words. As for Biden and the rest of the Democrats, we're already on three indictments, and it's more than a year until Biden's first term is over. Furthermore, Trump is Biden's chief rival in the upcoming presidential election. If this were happening in some foreign country, we condemn it as undemocratic to try to imprison your chief political opponent before an election. I remember hearing so much about how Trump didn't respect democratic norms. So, excuse me if I find it rich that the same people who worried about maintaining democratic norms are trying to jail their chief political opponent and hope he gets raped in prison if convicted.

 

I guess TFG couldn't find a prosecutor to take the case. Speaking of whining, say "indictment" in far right GOP circles and listen to them moan in unison.

True, dat. Attempting to subvert the election process is a bad thing, a crime, even. It should be punished. TFG should welcome the opportunity to clear his name, but it seems he'd rather delay. Could it be he wants to remain a free man as long as possible? It should be remembered Hillary didn't invoke the 5th Amendment during her various tesimonies to Congress and Grand Juries,while TFG has done so repeatedly.

Biden hasn't been indicted. If you want to judge him based on the actions of his son, feel free. But you're not going to be able to jail him that way.
It looks like quite a few TFG administration goons committed crimes and they're willing turn state's evidence to escape punishment. TFG lost the popular vote in 2016. He lost the whole shebang in 2020. The GOP 'Red Wave' turned out to be more like a wet fart. What makes you think TFG can beat the Democrats this time? Or even that he will be the strongest GOP candidate come the primaries? They're still 8 months away, quite awhile in political terms.

He kinda proved that Jan. 6, 2020,didn't he? Also with the documents. I honestly think the Democrats would rather run against TFG than have to run Biden on his merits. So i have trouble believing this is a political hatchet job. a lot of what TFG was doing was illegal on its face and he knew it.

TFG is being prosecuted for CRIMES. Not his political standing or beliefs.

Sally ally said nothing about hoping TFG gets raped. That was taken for granted, which is funny in itself. TFG would still be entitled to Secret Service protection, and he is not likely to be put in general population. Both of which add a consensual dimension to TFG being the catcher. And what if he is the pitcher? Say what you like about never showing tendencies, prison changes a man.

 

Yes, America turning into a fascistic banana republic where you arrest your political opponents seems to rub people the wrong way. Go figure.

I mean, look at the optics.

Crimes? What crimes? Are these the supposed crimes that are brought to you by the people behind Russia collusion, quid pro quo, and Trump's supposed incitement of a riot? Prove to me that Trump colluded with the Russians. Prove to me that Trump told Ukraine that they would not get military aid if Biden was not investigated. Prove to me that Trump incited a riot.

For people who like to read between the lines, when it comes to defending the despicableness on your side of the aisle, it's only then that implication has no standing. She was asking where his boyfriend Bubba was; arguably, she was hoping that he was going to be raped, which is why she used the word "Bubba." Why else would she use the term "Bubba"?

 

First off, Biden was photoshopped into that background. It's not a real photograph, it's a cartoon. Cartoons do not depict reality, at best they convey propaganda.

Second, I don't care for Biden. The best thing I can say about him is that while the GOP has made all kinds of insinuations, even Comer admits they have no actual evidence.

Not even gonna try. If you don't believe TFG is being prosecuted for crimes, read the indictments. Each of them names the crimes he is accused of, not his political beliefs.

TFG is not going to trial over actions he took in Russia or Ukraine. I don't think he's been indicted for the Jan. 6 riot either. You're reaching for straws.

This is pretty much word salad. If I read it right, you're saying that because YOU could make her question have a meaning that YOU interpret as 'despicable', she and everyone who shares her political beliefs- not her sense of humor- is despicable as well.

At this point I would remind you that despicable is a moral judgement, not one about humor. I recall no Commandment saying 'Thou shalt not laugh.' If you know where such a precept is in any holy book, cite it and I'll leave this part of the argument alone. As it is, you are betraying your rigidity and the self-righteousness of those who apply moral standards to questions which are not moral in nature. Even if it's bad taste, bad taste is no sin.

 

Wait, hold on, you're telling me he didn't have a speech at night with a blood-red backdrop? That didn't happen?

I mean, there was apparent editing that did occur with that speech. For example, CNN appeared to have made the red backdrop pinker to improve optics.

Actual Speech


CNN's Apparent Touch-Up:


See what I did there? I backed up my claim. I stated that CNN appeared to have edited the background, and then I backed it up with evidence. You should try it sometime.

Essentially, those are the indictments--reaching for straws. The only one that really has any basis to it is the one in Florida. But it would be hypocrisy if Trump gets convicted, and yet Hillary never even got indicted for essentially the same thing. Democrats are the only side trying to jail their political opponents.

 

Not going to indulge whataboutism. a crime is a crime no matter who commits it In fact, I largely agree with you about Hillary. But this thread is about TFG and whether he will serve time in General population in a federal prison. OF COURSE NOT! They'll put him on a military base somewhere with some Marshals and a Secret Service crew.

As to the indictments, those were voted on by the jurors, not the prosecutors.

Isn't the GOP gathering evidence on the Bidens? That would be about putting them in jail.


See what I did there? Used your own words to show you lied.[/quote]

 

The prosecutors are Democrats? I didn't know that. It wouldn't surprise me. As to the jury, jurors cannot be Democrats? Wasn't each grand jury that voted for each indictment in a Democrat stronghold? Therefore, that would make a good case that they are mostly Democrats.

To show I lied about what? What are you talking about?

And the GOP is gathering evidence on Biden? Will they try to put Biden in jail? Well, that's a big if. The GOP in Congress like to talk a lot. But as far as action? I don't know. I don't see much evidence for trying to jail Biden.

But let's say that the GOP is trying to now jail the Bidens. They would simply be following precedent set by Democrats. Democrats seem to have a super passion to destroy our republic and republicanism.

 

But it puts a dent in your theory that the party is behind the indictments. Also, GA is a red state.

That the Republicans are not trying to imprison their political opponents.

No howls about Hunter's laptop? No trying to link Joe to hunter and his business partners? If you haven't heard it, you're just not listening. I don't think they'd gather evidence just to have it. If you do, you're admitting the GOP is just playing political games.

Trying someone for crimes when they've been accused and indicted is not a threat to the republic. Some of the crimes TFG has been accused of are existential threats to it.

By your reasoning, it is the GOP that seems determined to destroy the US, playing political games in a pathetic attempt to shield its leader from justice.