Mass Shooting at Texas Home

Lol it's nothing to do with ignorance of the law.

 

Uh-huh.

Guess what? Those claims you keep trying to make would do just as much good in a court of law if somebody else was crying "But I didn't know she was only 15".

 

You cannot prosecute someone just because they didn't know what a tattoo stood for

 

A tear drop tattoo, as you're well aware, indicates that you murdered someone for the gang.
You gonna tell me if someone has MS13 tattooed on their face you don't know what that means?

Someone without teeth is likely a meth head unless they are very aged. Again: This is basic **** man.
Are you honestly saying you don't know a tweaker when you see one?

 

They don't understand that it goes to a jury and if regular people think you're a jackass trying on the ostrich defense they're going to drop the hammer on you.

 

If the jury considers that common knowledge you should've known and you sold them a firearm? You sure as **** can.

 

I'll bet you are surprised to hear, but most gun owners are responsible and law abiding citizens, and would have no problem
completing sales at a dealer in order to ensure the buyer is good and legal. I know you don't care, but most folks do care.

 

I've never met one of these people in person. I attend gun shows monthly for two days straight. Not one person I ever met was pleased to do an FFL check. They'd do it, but they were not happy about doing it.

 

By the same logic that you can't be prosecuted after being caught in bed with a 14 year old, because you did not know she was only 14? Because that is the exact same logic you are attempting to use.

 

yeah but they also resent that they would have to do that if say they were on a hunting trip and wanted to loan their brother in law a rifle for that trip. And I really tire of your lies that "I don't care" is the same as questioning the use of your feel good schemes. I know damn well that the anti gun left loves passing laws that are designed to turn peaceful gun owners into "criminals" so the gun banners can use the legal process for additional harassment.

 

Well that's a load of rubbish. There is a law saying that it is illegal to sleep with someone below a specified age. There is no law saying you can't sell a gun to someone who has a tattoo

 

No, they don't. You clearly resent any effort to reduce the carnage, but vast majority of people do not.

 

that is dishonest because all the schemes I oppose are designed to harass lawful gun owners, not reduce violent crime

 

There is a clear law against selling a firearm to somebody that might not be allowed to own one.

And for some reason, you seem obsessed that you are in fact able to do that, and nothing can be done to you about it.

But here is the exact same logic you are using once again. There is no law against having sex with a female, therefore there is no law saying you can not have sex with a girl so long as she looks to be 18.

That is the exact same logic you are trying and failing to use.

Of course, all this is rather moot because even though there are laws in place and it is a felony, that law is almost never enforced. Just like the laws of those who lie on the purchase paperwork are almost never enforced. Or who do straw purchases. But the refusal to enforce none of those has not a thing to do with the fallacy of your claim. You could sell a fun to somebody after you watch them walk out of a state prison, and likely nobody would ever charge you for that.

 

Do you get paid to explain (misrepresent) what other people think and what motivates them?

How about you let people speak for themselves.

You oppose EVERYTHING, except arming the crazies.

 

your posts constantly misrepresent other peoples' positions while ignoring the fact that your feel good schemes are not going to do anything useful but can be used to deny and delay constitutional rights

 

That's fairly ironic coming from someone who makes a hobby out of misrepresenting others.